Why may patients with spinal cord injury be overlooked for obesity screening in the Veterans Health Administration? Qualitative research of the perspectives of patients and healthcare providers

被引:1
作者
Nevedal, Andrea L. [1 ,7 ]
Wu, Justina [2 ]
LaVela, Sherri L. [3 ,4 ]
Harris, Alex H. S. [2 ,5 ]
Frayne, Susan M. [2 ,6 ]
Arnow, Katherine D. [5 ]
Barreto, Nicolas B. [5 ]
Davis, Kristen [5 ]
Eisenberg, Dan [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] VA Ann Arbor Healthcare Syst, VA Ctr Clin Management Res, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[2] VA Palo Alto Hlth Care Syst, Ctr Innovat Implementat, Palo Alto, CA USA
[3] VA Edward Hines Jr, Ctr Innovat Complex Chron Healthcare, Hines, IL USA
[4] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Chicago, IL USA
[5] Stanford Univ, Stanford Surg Policy Improvement Res & Educ Ctr, Sch Med, Stanford, CA USA
[6] Stanford Univ, Dept Med, Sch Med, Stanford, CA USA
[7] VA Ann Arbor Healthcare Syst Ctr Clin Management R, 2215 Fuller Rd, Ann Arbor, MI 48105 USA
关键词
Spinal cord injuries; obesity; veterans; body mass index; content analyses; rapid qualitative analysis; healthcare providers; prevention; BODY-MASS INDEX; WAIST CIRCUMFERENCE; PREVENTIVE SERVICES; DISEASE RISK; MANAGEMENT; INDIVIDUALS; WEIGHT; HEIGHT;
D O I
10.1080/09638288.2022.2159074
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
PurposeWe sought to describe factors influencing reduced rates of obesity screening for patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) in the United States Veterans Health Administration (VA) and to foster potential solutions.Materials and MethodsSemi-structured interviews with healthcare providers and patients with SCI who were recruited nationally from diverse VAs. We performed rapid qualitative analysis using content analysis of interview data.ResultsThere were 36 providers and 37 patients. We identified provider, patient, and system level barriers to obesity screening for individuals with SCI. Overarching barriers involved provider and patient perceptions that obesity screening is a low priority compared to other health conditions, and body mass index is of low utility. Other obesity screening barriers were related to measuring weight (i.e., insufficient equipment, unknown wheelchair weight, staffing shortages, measurement errors, reduced access to annual screening, insufficient time, patient preference not to be weighed) and measuring height (i.e., insufficient guidance and equipment to this population, measurement errors).ConclusionsBarriers to obesity screenings exist for patients with SCI receiving care in VA. Healthcare provider and patient interviews suggest possible solutions, including standardizing height and weight measurement processes, ensuring equipment availability in clinics, clarifying guidelines, and offering support to providers and patients.
引用
收藏
页码:270 / 281
页数:12
相关论文
共 61 条
[31]   Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power [J].
Malterud, Kirsti ;
Siersma, Volkert Dirk ;
Guassora, Ann Dorrit .
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2016, 26 (13) :1753-1760
[32]   A comparison of measured versus self-reported anthropometrics for assessing obesity in adults: a literature review [J].
Maukonen, Mirkka ;
Mannisto, Satu ;
Tolonen, Hanna .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 46 (05) :565-579
[33]   Practical application of opt-out recruitment methods in two health services research studies [J].
Miller, Christopher J. ;
Burgess, James F., Jr. ;
Fischer, Ellen P. ;
Hodges, Deborah J. ;
Belanger, Lindsay K. ;
Lipschitz, Jessica M. ;
Easley, Siena R. ;
Koenig, Christopher J. ;
Stanley, Regina L. ;
Pyne, Jeffrey M. .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2017, 17
[34]   Critical Analysis of Strategies for Determining Rigor in Qualitative Inquiry [J].
Morse, Janice M. .
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2015, 25 (09) :1212-1222
[35]   Screening for and Management of Obesity in Adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement [J].
Moyer, Virginia A. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 157 (05) :373-U126
[36]   Method for estimating body weight in persons with lower-limb amputation and its implication for their nutritional assessment [J].
Mozumdar, A ;
Roy, SK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2004, 80 (04) :868-875
[37]   Evaluating Bang for the Buck: A Cost-Effectiveness Comparison Between Individual Interviews and Focus Groups Based on Thematic Saturation Levels [J].
Namey, Emily ;
Guest, Greg ;
McKenna, Kevin ;
Chen, Mario .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EVALUATION, 2016, 37 (03) :425-440
[38]   Identification and Management of Cardiometabolic Risk after Spinal Cord Injury: Clinical Practice Guideline for Health Care Providers [J].
Nash, Mark S. ;
Groah, Suzanne L. ;
Gater, David R., Jr. ;
Dyson-Hudson, Trevor A. ;
Lieberman, Jesse A. ;
Myers, Jonathan ;
Sabharwal, Sunil ;
Taylor, Allen J. .
TOPICS IN SPINAL CORD INJURY REHABILITATION, 2018, 24 (04) :379-423
[39]   Rapid versus traditional qualitative analysis using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) [J].
Nevedal, Andrea L. ;
Reardon, Caitlin M. ;
Opra Widerquist, Marilla A. ;
Jackson, George L. ;
Cutrona, Sarah L. ;
White, Brandolyn S. ;
Damschroder, Laura J. .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2021, 16 (01)
[40]   The impact of obesity in rehabilitation: a mismatch between staff perception and hospital outcomes [J].
Oakley, Lisa ;
Soh, Sze-Ee ;
Kimmel, Lara ;
Mulvey, Nina ;
Curtis, Heather ;
Holland, Anne E. .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2022, 44 (03) :363-369