Theory in Action: Public Health and Community Power Building for Health Equity

被引:17
作者
Heller, Jonathan C. [1 ]
Little, Olivia M. [1 ]
Faust, Victoria [1 ]
Tran, Paula [1 ]
Givens, Marjory L. [1 ]
Ayers, Jeanne [2 ]
Farhang, Lili [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Populat Hlth Inst, 610 Walnut St, 575 WARF, Madison, WI 53726 USA
[2] Hlth Democracy Hlth People, St Paul, MN USA
[3] Human Impact Partners, Oakland, CA USA
关键词
community power building; health equity; public health practice; social determinants of health;
D O I
10.1097/PHH.0000000000001681
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Context:Within the field of public health, there is growing awareness of how complex social conditions shape health outcomes and the role that power plays in driving health inequities. Despite public health frameworks lifting up the need to tackle power imbalances to advance equity, there is little guidance on how to accomplish this as an integral part of health promotion. Objective:This article addresses the need for public health professionals to better understand power and identifies opportunities for shifting power to achieve more equitable outcomes. First, it defines power and community power building. Next, it reviews a pragmatic theoretical framework that organizes power into 3 faces: (1) exercising influence in formal decision-making processes; (2) organizing the decision-making environment; and (3) shaping worldviews about social issues. Finally, it connects each face of power to community power-building practices using concrete examples. Implementation:This article highlights real-world case examples to demonstrate how theory translates to action by describing how public health practitioners in government, academic, and nonprofit settings incorporate the 3 faces of power into their work. The case examples illustrate how public health organizations and practitioners can partner with those most impacted by inequities to help shape decision making, agenda setting, and worldviews to influence policy and practice toward more equitable outcomes. Discussion:The public health field can learn from and build on these innovative examples to establish new practices, scale up promising approaches, and evaluate what works to shift power for the greater good.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 38
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], Community organizing and community building for health and welfare, DOI DOI 10.36019/9780813553146-019
[2]  
Christens B.D., 2016, Handbook of methodological approaches to community‐based research: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods, P243
[3]   Public Health 3.0: A Call to Action for Public Health to Meet the Challenges of the 21st Century [J].
DeSalvo, Karen B. ;
Wang, Y. Claire ;
Harris, Andrea ;
Auerbach, John ;
Koo, Denise ;
O'Carroll, Patrick .
PREVENTING CHRONIC DISEASE, 2017, 14
[4]   Power-building Partnerships for Health: Lessons From Santa Barbara About Building Power to Protect Farmworker Health and Advance Health Equity [J].
Gaydos, Megan ;
Van Do-Reynoso ;
Williams, Marley ;
Davalos, Hazel ;
Lopez, Arcenio J. .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT AND PRACTICE, 2022, 28 (04) :S166-S170
[5]   A glossary of theories for understanding power and policy for health equity [J].
Harris, Patrick ;
Baum, Fran ;
Friel, Sharon ;
Mackean, Tamara ;
Schram, Ashley ;
Townsend, Bel .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2020, 74 (06) :548-552
[6]  
Healey R., 3 FACEPOWER
[7]  
Human Impact Partners, DEV TRANSF CRIM JUST
[8]  
Human Impact Partners, POW BUILD PARTN HLTH
[9]  
Human Impact Partners, HLTH IMP GUAR PAID S
[10]  
Institute of Medicine (US) Committee for the Study of the Future of Public Health, 1988, FUT PUBL HLTH