Resource Scarcity and Humanitarian Social Innovation: Observations from Hunger Relief in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic

被引:20
作者
Shaheen, Iana [1 ]
Azadegan, Arash [2 ]
Davis, Donna F. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
[2] Rutgers State Univ, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
[3] Univ S Florida, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
关键词
Resource scarcity; Social innovation; Social enterprise; Bricolage; COVID-19; pandemic; SUPPLY-CHAIN; PERFORMANCE; CONSTRAINTS; FIRMS; ENTREPRENEURSHIP; CAPABILITIES; PARTNERSHIPS; MANAGEMENT; LOGISTICS; CRISIS;
D O I
10.1007/s10551-021-05014-9
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Humanitarian social enterprises (HSEs) are facing mounting pressure to incorporate social innovation into their practice. This study thus identifies how HSEs leverage organizational capabilities toward developing social innovation. Specifically, it considers how resource scarcity and operating circumstances affect the capabilities used by HSEs for developing social innovation, using a longitudinal case study approach with qualitative data from 12 hunger-relief HSEs operating in the United States. Based on 59 interviews with 31 managers and directors and related documents, several propositions are posited. The findings suggest that resource availability (i.e., scarcity vs. abundance) leads some HSEs to focus on developing social innovation using their collaborative capabilities, while others leverage their absorptive capacity. Further, HSEs adjust their approach to developing social innovation based on whether they are operating in ordinary circumstances (i.e., before the COVID pandemic) or extraordinary ones (i.e., during the COVID pandemic). Interestingly, the findings suggest that the organizational capabilities used by HSEs are adjusted as these enterprises become more familiar with extraordinary operating circumstances. For example, at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, resource-scarce HSEs focused on parallel bricolage to develop social innovation. Subsequently, they focused on selective bricolage. The findings offer novel insights by relating the social innovation of social enterprises to crisis management.
引用
收藏
页码:597 / 617
页数:21
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Humanitarian Innovation: The State of the Art
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2022, United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs - occupied Palestinian territory | Data on casualties
[3]   An Examination of the Relationship between Intellectual Capital and Supply Chain Integration in Humanitarian Aid Organizations: A Survey-Based Investigation of Food Banks [J].
Ataseven, Cigdem ;
Nair, Anand ;
Ferguson, Mark .
DECISION SCIENCES, 2018, 49 (05) :827-862
[4]   Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? [J].
Austin, J ;
Stevenson, H ;
Wei-Skillern, J .
ENTREPRENEURSHIP THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2006, 30 (01) :1-22
[5]   BENEFITING FROM SUPPLIER OPERATIONAL INNOVATIVENESS: THE INFLUENCE OF SUPPLIER EVALUATIONS AND ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY [J].
Azadegan, Arash .
JOURNAL OF SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 2011, 47 (02) :49-64
[6]   Supplier innovativeness, organizational learning styles and manufacturer performance: An empirical assessment [J].
Azadegan, Arash ;
Dooley, Kevin J. .
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2010, 28 (06) :488-505
[7]   Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage [J].
Baker, T ;
Nelson, RE .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2005, 50 (03) :329-366
[8]   Growth, innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities [J].
Bettencourt, Luis M. A. ;
Lobo, Jose ;
Helbing, Dirk ;
Kuehnert, Christian ;
West, Geoffrey B. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2007, 104 (17) :7301-7306
[9]   Social Entrepreneurship in Non-munificent Institutional Environments and Implications for Institutional Work: Insights from China [J].
Bhatt, Babita ;
Qureshi, Israr ;
Riaz, Suhaib .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2019, 154 (03) :605-630
[10]   How social capital is leveraged in social innovations under resource constraints? [J].
Bhatt, Punita ;
Altinay, Levent .
MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2013, 51 (09) :1772-1792