Using Instrumental Variables to Measure Causation over Time in Cross-Lagged Panel Models

被引:0
|
作者
Singh, Madhurbain [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Verhulst, Brad [4 ]
Vinh, Philip [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Yi [2 ,5 ]
Castro-de-Araujo, Luis F. S. [2 ]
Hottenga, Jouke-Jan [3 ,6 ]
Pool, Rene [3 ,6 ]
de Geus, Eco J. C. [3 ,6 ]
Vink, Jacqueline M. [7 ]
Boomsma, Dorret I. [3 ,6 ]
Maes, Hermine H. M. [1 ,2 ]
Dolan, Conor V. [3 ,6 ]
Neale, Michael C. [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Human & Mol Genet, Richmond, VA USA
[2] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Virginia Inst Psychiat & Behav Genet, Richmond, VA 23284 USA
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Biol Psychol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, College Stn, TX USA
[5] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Psychiat, Richmond, VA USA
[6] Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[7] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Behav Sci Inst, Nijmege, Netherlands
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Causal inference; instrumental variables; CLPM; lagged effects; TOBACCO CO-USE; MENDELIAN RANDOMIZATION; USE DISORDERS; ALCOHOL; SMOKING; INCREASES; SYMPTOMS; ADULTS; IMPACT; RISK;
D O I
10.1080/00273171.2023.2283634
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Cross-lagged panel models (CLPMs) are commonly used to estimate causal influences between two variables with repeated assessments. The lagged effects in a CLPM depend on the time interval between assessments, eventually becoming undetectable at longer intervals. To address this limitation, we incorporate instrumental variables (IVs) into the CLPM with two study waves and two variables. Doing so enables estimation of both the lagged (i.e., "distal") effects and the bidirectional cross-sectional (i.e., "proximal") effects at each wave. The distal effects reflect Granger-causal influences across time, which decay with increasing time intervals. The proximal effects capture causal influences that accrue over time and can help infer causality when the distal effects become undetectable at longer intervals. Significant proximal effects, with a negligible distal effect, would imply that the time interval is too long to estimate a lagged effect at that time interval using the standard CLPM. Through simulations and an empirical application, we demonstrate the impact of time intervals on causal inference in the CLPM and present modeling strategies to detect causal influences regardless of the time interval in a study. Furthermore, to motivate empirical applications of the proposed model, we highlight the utility and limitations of using genetic variables as IVs in large-scale panel studies.
引用
收藏
页码:342 / 370
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Critique of the Cross-Lagged Panel Model
    Hamaker, Ellen L.
    Kuiper, Rebecca M.
    Grasman, Raoul P. P. P.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2015, 20 (01) : 102 - 116
  • [2] Joint Effects in Cross-Lagged Panel Research Using Structural Nested Mean Models
    Mulder, Jeroen D.
    Usami, Satoshi
    Hamaker, Ellen L.
    STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2025, 32 (02) : 339 - 355
  • [3] Fear of Falling Carries Over into Overprotection in Old Age: A Cross-Lagged Panel Analysis
    Steckhan, Greta M.
    Fleig, Lena
    Wurm, Susanne
    Wolff, Julia K.
    Schwarzer, Ralf
    Warner, Lisa M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGING & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 98 (04) : 436 - 451
  • [4] Drinking Motives and Drinking Behavior Over Time: A Full Cross-Lagged Panel Study Among Adults
    Crutzen, Rik
    Kuntsche, Emmanuel
    Schelleman-Offermans, Karen
    PSYCHOLOGY OF ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2013, 27 (01) : 197 - 201
  • [5] Detecting spurious effects in cross-lagged panel models: Triangulation is not a valid test
    Lucas, Richard E.
    Weidmann, Rebekka
    Brandt, Mark J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2024,
  • [6] Cross-Lagged Mendelian Randomization: Extending Causal Inference in Observational Studies by Integrating Genetic Instrumental Variables with Repeated-Measures Designs
    Singh, Madhurbain
    Verhulst, Brad
    Vinh, Philip
    Zhou, Yi
    Castro-de-Araujo, Luis F. S.
    Dolan, Conor V.
    Neale, Michael C.
    BEHAVIOR GENETICS, 2022, 52 (06) : 391 - 391
  • [7] Sensation seeking versus alcohol use: Evaluating temporal precedence using cross-lagged panel models
    Lac, Andrew
    Donaldson, Candice D.
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2021, 219
  • [8] Equivalent Approaches to Dealing With Unobserved Heterogeneity in Cross-Lagged Panel Models? Investigating the Benefits and Drawbacks of the Latent Curve Model With Structured Residuals and the Random Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Model
    Andersen, Henrik Kenneth
    PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2022, 27 (05) : 730 - 751
  • [9] Comparing findings from the random-intercept cross-lagged panel model and the monozygotic twin difference cross-lagged panel model: Maladaptive parenting and offspring emotional and behavioural problems
    Kullberg, Marie-Louise J.
    Van Schie, Charlotte C.
    Allegrini, Andrea G.
    Ahmadzadeh, Yasmin
    Wechsler, Daniel L.
    Elzinga, Bernet M.
    McAdams, Tom A.
    JCPP ADVANCES, 2024, 4 (01):
  • [10] Long-Run Effects in Dynamic Systems: New Tools for Cross-Lagged Panel Models
    Shamsollahi, Ali
    Zyphur, Michael J.
    Ozkok, Ozlem
    ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2022, 25 (03) : 435 - 458