Research on Government Green Subsidy Strategy of Heterogeneous Agricultural Product Supply Chain

被引:2
|
作者
Wu, Rong [1 ]
Chen, Yanqi [1 ]
Jiang, Man [1 ]
Zhang, Jian [1 ]
机构
[1] Harbin Univ Commerce, Sch Management, Harbin 150028, Peoples R China
关键词
WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; INNOVATION SUBSIDY; QUALITY; SCHEME; CHOICE; FOOD; COMPETITION; POLICIES; MARKET;
D O I
10.1155/2023/8040707
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
To promote dual carbon targets, this study builds a heterogeneous agricultural product supply chain comprised of a green agricultural product producer, an ordinary agricultural products producer, and a retailer. This study constructs four strategic government green subsidy models, wherein the nongovernment subsidy, government subsidy for green agricultural producers, subsidy for green consumers, and dual subsidies. Based on Stackelberg's game theory, this study analyzes the impact of differentiated green subsidies on heterogeneous agricultural product supply chain decision-making. The results show that the government will provide green subsidies only when the input cost coefficient of green quality is within a certain threshold. Consumers' preference for green agricultural products will improve the level of green quality. The dual subsidy strategy of the government has the highest social welfare and can stimulate the motivation of green production. When considering the subsidy expenditure, the green consumer subsidy strategy can achieve a higher level of green quality and promote the consumption of green agricultural products. The government should combine different subsidy target effects and subsidy effects to provide appropriate green subsidy strategies. According to the corresponding subsidy strategy, the producers and retailers of heterogeneous agricultural products carry out green investment, reasonable pricing, and precision marketing.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A coordination contract for green agricultural product supply chain with stochastic output
    Lan C.
    Journal Europeen des Systemes Automatises, 2019, 52 (04): : 347 - 354
  • [32] Comparative Analysis of Government Subsidy Policies in a Dynamic Green Supply Chain Considering Consumers Preference
    Lu, Chao
    Huang, Weilai
    Cheng, Haifang
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (21)
  • [33] Correction to: Impact of demand forecast information sharingon the decision of a green supply chain with government subsidy
    Wenbin Wang
    Wanying Lin
    Jianhu Cai
    Mengxue Chen
    Annals of Operations Research, 2023, 329 : 1425 - 1425
  • [34] Impact of Altruistic Preference and Government Subsidy on the Multinational Green Supply Chain under Dynamic Tariff
    Rong, Luqing
    Xu, Maozeng
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 24 (02) : 1928 - 1958
  • [35] Impact of Altruistic Preference and Government Subsidy on the Multinational Green Supply Chain under Dynamic Tariff
    Luqing Rong
    Maozeng Xu
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2022, 24 : 1928 - 1958
  • [36] Research on Government Subsidy Policy of Grain Supply Chain Considering the Efforts of Loss Reduction
    Liu, Pan
    Li, Mengjuan
    Liu, Qian
    ENGINEERING LETTERS, 2024, 32 (07) : 1476 - 1485
  • [37] Green Technology Investment with Data-Driven Marketing and Government Subsidy in a Platform Supply Chain
    Li, Ke
    Dai, Gengxin
    Xia, Yanfei
    Mu, Zongyu
    Zhang, Guitao
    Shi, Yangyan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (07)
  • [38] Comparative Study on Low-Carbon Strategy and Government Subsidy Model of Pharmaceutical Supply Chain
    Wen, Yan
    Liu, Lu
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (10)
  • [39] Innovation effort strategy of green supply chain considering government subsidies
    Xing P.
    Zhou C.
    Li C.
    Jisuanji Jicheng Zhizao Xitong/Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, CIMS, 2024, 30 (05): : 1889 - 1907
  • [40] The Analysis and Strategy Research on Green Degree of Enterprise in Green Supply Chain
    Liu, Lijin
    LTLGB 2012: PROCEEDINGS OF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LOW-CARBON TRANSPORTATION AND LOGISTICS, AND GREEN BUILDINGS. VOL 1, 2013, : 503 - 509