Before and after AlphaFold2: An overview of protein structure prediction

被引:112
作者
Bertoline, Leticia M. F. [1 ]
Lima, Angelica N. [1 ]
Krieger, Jose E. [1 ]
Teixeira, Samantha K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Med Sch, Heart Inst, Lab Genet & Mol Cardiol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
来源
FRONTIERS IN BIOINFORMATICS | 2023年 / 3卷
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
protein structure prediction; AlphaFold; template-based modeling; free modeling; protein language model; FOLD RECOGNITION;
D O I
10.3389/fbinf.2023.1120370
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Three-dimensional protein structure is directly correlated with its function and its determination is critical to understanding biological processes and addressing human health and life science problems in general. Although new protein structures are experimentally obtained over time, there is still a large difference between the number of protein sequences placed in Uniprot and those with resolved tertiary structure. In this context, studies have emerged to predict protein structures by methods based on a template or free modeling. In the last years, different methods have been combined to overcome their individual limitations, until the emergence of AlphaFold2, which demonstrated that predicting protein structure with high accuracy at unprecedented scale is possible. Despite its current impact in the field, AlphaFold2 has limitations. Recently, new methods based on protein language models have promised to revolutionize the protein structural biology allowing the discovery of protein structure and function only from evolutionary patterns present on protein sequence. Even though these methods do not reach AlphaFold2 accuracy, they already covered some of its limitations, being able to predict with high accuracy more than 200 million proteins from metagenomic databases. In this mini-review, we provide an overview of the breakthroughs in protein structure prediction before and after AlphaFold2 emergence.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
Agnihotry S., 2021, BIOINFORMATICS, P177, DOI [10.1016/b978-0-323-89775-4.00023-7, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-323-89775-4.00023-7]
[2]   The Epigenetic Dimension of Protein Structure Is an Intrinsic Weakness of the AlphaFold Program [J].
Azzaz, Fodil ;
Yahi, Nouara ;
Chahinian, Henri ;
Fantini, Jacques .
BIOMOLECULES, 2022, 12 (10)
[3]   Learning the protein language: Evolution, structure, and function [J].
Bepler, Tristan ;
Berger, Bonnie .
CELL SYSTEMS, 2021, 12 (06) :654-+
[4]  
Blackwell S, 2021, bioRxiv, DOI DOI 10.1101/2021.10.04.463034
[5]   Different methods, techniques and their limitations in protein structure prediction: A review [J].
Bongirwar, Vrushali ;
Mokhade, A. S. .
PROGRESS IN BIOPHYSICS & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2022, 173 :72-82
[6]   Protein structure prediction by AlphaFold2: are attention and symmetries all you need? [J].
Bouatta, Nazim ;
Sorger, Peter ;
AlQuraishi, Mohammed .
ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA SECTION D-STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2021, 77 :982-991
[7]   Improved prediction of protein-protein interactions using AlphaFold2 [J].
Bryant, P. ;
Pozzati, G. ;
Elofsson, A. .
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 13 (01)
[8]   Can AlphaFold2 predict the impact of missense mutations on structure? [J].
Buel, Gwen R. ;
Walters, Kylie J. .
NATURE STRUCTURAL & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2022, 29 (01) :1-2
[9]   WHAT'S NEXT FOR ALPHAFOLD AND THE AI PROTEIN-FOLDING REVOLUTION [J].
Callaway, Ewen .
NATURE, 2022, 604 (7905) :234-238
[10]   The protein folding problem: when will it be solved? [J].
Dill, Ken A. ;
Ozkan, S. Banu ;
Weikl, Thomas R. ;
Chodera, John D. ;
Voelz, Vincent A. .
CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2007, 17 (03) :342-346