The Minimum Effective Concentration (MEC95) of different volumes of ropivacaine for ultrasound-guided caudal epidural block: a dose-finding study

被引:2
|
作者
Ma, Dongmei [1 ]
Chen, Yan [2 ]
Chen, Ping [1 ]
Xu, Jianhong [1 ]
Guo, Jian [1 ]
Peng, Lijia [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 4, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Xinjiang Med Univ, Clin Med Coll 6, Dept Anesthesiol, Urumqi, Xinjiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Caudal epidural block; Ultrasound; Dixon up-and-down method; ANESTHESIA; BUPIVACAINE; GUIDANCE; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1186/s12871-023-02026-y
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BackgroundCaudal epidural block (CEB) may be beneficial in anorectal surgery because its use may extend postoperative analgesia. This dose-finding study aimed to estimate the minimum effective anesthetic concentrations for 95% patients(MEC95) of 20 ml or 25 ml of ropivacaine in with CEB.Patients and methodsIn this double-blind, prospective study, the concentration of ropivacaine administered in 20 ml and 25 ml for ultrasound-guided CEB were determined using the sample up-and-down sequential allocation study design of binary response variables. The first participant was given 0.5% ropivacaine. Depending on whether a block was successful or unsuccessful, the concentration of local anesthesia was decreased or increased by 0.025% in the next patient. Every five minutes for 30 min, the sensory blockade using a pin-prick sensation at S3 dermatome compared to at T6 dermatome were evaluated every 5 min within 30 min. An effective CEB was defined as a a reduction of sensation at S3 dermatome and the existence of flaccid anal sphincter. Anesthesia was considered successful if the surgeon could perform the surgery without additional anesthesia. We determined the MEC50 using the Dixon and Massey up-and-down method and estimated the MEC95 using probit regression.ResultsThe concentration of ropivacaine administered in 20 ml for CEB ranged from 0.2% to 0.5%. Probit regression with a bias-corrected Morris 95% CI derived by bootstrapping showed an MEC50 and MEC 50 of ropivacaine for anorectal surgical anesthesia were 0.27% (95% CI, 0.24 to 0.31) and 0.36%(95% CI, 0.32 to 0.61). The concentration of ropivacaine administered in 25 ml for CEB ranged from 0.175 to 0.5. Probit regression with a bias-corrected Morris 95% CI derived by bootstrapping showed an MEC50 and MEC95 for CEB were 0.24% (95% CI, 0.19 to 0.27) and 0.32% (95% CI, 0.28 to 0.54).ConclusionWith ultrasound-guided CEB, the MEC95 of 0.36% ropivacaine at 20 ml and 0.32% ropivacaine at 25 ml provide adequate surgical anesthesia/analgesia 95% of patients undergoing anorectoal surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [31] Median Effective Analgesic Concentration of Ropivacaine in Ultrasound-Guided Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block as a Postoperative Analgesia for Proximal Humerus Fracture: A Prospective Double-Blind Up-Down Concentration-Finding Study
    Liu, Yang
    Xu, Cheng
    Wang, Chengyu
    Gu, Fei
    Chen, Rui
    Lu, Jie
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [32] Minimum effective anaesthetic volume of 0.5% ropivacaine for ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block in patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery: determination of ED50 and ED95
    Jeong, J. S.
    Shim, J. C.
    Jeong, M. A.
    Lee, B. C.
    Sung, I. H.
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2015, 43 (01) : 92 - 97
  • [33] What is the minimum effective anesthetic volume (MEAV90) of 0.2% ropivacaine required for ultrasound-guided popliteal-sciatic nerve block?
    David, Sandeep N.
    Varghese, Davies C.
    Valiaveedan, Sebastian
    JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 37 (03) : 402 - 405
  • [34] The Median Effective Analgesic Concentration of Ropivacaine in Sciatic Nerve Block Guided by Ultrasound After Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Double-Blind Up-Down Concentration-Finding Study
    Xu, Cheng
    Gu, Fei
    Wang, Chengyu
    Liu, Yang
    Chen, Rui
    Zhou, Quanhong
    Lu, Jie
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [35] Determination of the minimum effective volume of bupivacaine for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block: a prospective, observer-blind, controlled study
    Baskan, Semih
    Vural, Cagil
    Erdogmus, Necati Alper
    Aytac, Ismail
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 72 (02): : 280 - 285
  • [36] A randomized double-blinded study assessing the effect of different doses of transnasal dexmedetomidine on the median effective concentration of ropivacaine for a caudal block
    Wang, Fu
    Qu, Shijie
    Chen, Yinglu
    Liao, Bo
    Ao, Li
    Zhang, Hui
    Zhou, Hongyan
    Zhang, Liang
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 11
  • [37] Comparison of the incidence of intravascular injection using the Tuohy and Quincke needles during ultrasound-guided caudal epidural block: a prospective randomized controlled study
    Kim, Ji Yeong
    Lee, Jong Seok
    Kim, Ji Young
    Baek, Ji Won
    Kim, Hye Su
    Kim, Do-Hyeong
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2024, 49 (01) : 17 - 22
  • [38] Effect of Local Anesthetic Concentration (0.2% vs 0.1% Ropivacaine) on Pulmonary Function, and Analgesia After Ultrasound-Guided Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block: A Randomized Controlled Study
    Wong, Andrew K.
    Keeney, Lauren Georgiades
    Chen, Liting
    Williams, Rebekah
    Liu, Jiabin
    Elkassabany, Nabil M.
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2016, 17 (12) : 2397 - 2403
  • [39] RETRACTED: Study on the Effect of Different Doses of Hydromorphone on the Time Response and Postoperative Analgesia of Ropivacaine in Ultrasound-Guided Suprailiac Fascia Inguinal Block (Retracted Article)
    Wang, Baiyun
    Hu, Bingbing
    Zhong, Huanhui
    Zhao, Chengda
    EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 2021
  • [40] Respiratory effects and analgesic efficacy of different local anesthetic volumes in ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block for shoulder arthroscopy: Prospective randomized study
    Ahmed, A.
    Lotfyy, M. A.
    Bduallah, M. A. A.
    Lbadry, A. A. A.
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA BELGICA, 2024, 75 (02) : 81 - 90