RANS-Based Modelling of Turbulent Flow in Submarine Pipe Bends: Effect of Computational Mesh and Turbulence Modelling

被引:1
|
作者
Yang, Qi [1 ,2 ]
Dong, Jie [3 ,4 ]
Xing, Tongju [3 ,4 ]
Zhang, Yi [5 ]
Guan, Yong [3 ,4 ]
Liu, Xiaoli [6 ]
Tian, Ye [3 ,4 ]
Yu, Peng [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, State Key Lab Hydrosci & Engn, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] Politecn Milan, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[3] Minist Nat Resources, Key Lab Geol Safety Coastal Urban Underground Spac, Qingdao 266100, Peoples R China
[4] Qingdao Geol Explorat Dev Bur, Qingdao Geoengn Surveying Inst, Qingdao 266100, Peoples R China
[5] Qingdao Prod Qual Testing Res Inst, Qingdao Prod Qual Testing Technol Inst, Qingdao 266000, Peoples R China
[6] Ocean Univ China, Coll Environm Sci & Engn, Qingdao 266100, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
turbulent flow; 90 degrees curved submarine pipes; CFD modelling; mesh configuration; turbulence modelling; boundary layer resolution; STREAM-LINE MOTION; REYNOLDS-NUMBER; FLUID; CFD;
D O I
10.3390/jmse11020336
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
Pipe bend is a critical integral component, widely used in slurry pipeline systems involving various engineering applications, including natural gas hydrate production. The aim of this study is to assess the capability of RANS-based CFD models to capture the main features of the turbulent single-phase flow in pipe bends, in view of the future investigation of the hydrate slurry flow in the same geometry. This is different from the available literature in which only a few accounted for the effects of a combination of computational mesh, turbulence model, and near-wall treatment approach. In this study, three types of mesh configuration were adopted to carry out the computations, namely unstructured mesh and two structured meshes with a uniform and nonuniform inflation layer, respectively. To explore the influence of the turbulence model, standard k-epsilon, low-Reynolds k-epsilon, and nonlinear eddy viscosity turbulence model were selected to close RANS equations. Pressure coefficient, mean axial velocity, turbulence intensity, secondary flow velocity, and magnitude of secondary flow were regarded as the critical variables to make a comprehensive sensitivity analysis. Predicted results suggest that turbulent kinetic energy is the most sensitive variable to the computational mesh while others tend to stabilize. The largest difference of turbulence kinetic energy was around 26% between unstructured mesh and structured mesh with a nonuniform inflation layer. Additionally, a fully resolved boundary layer can reduce the sensitivity of mesh on turbulent kinetic energy, especially for a nonlinear turbulence model. However, the large gradient and peak value of turbulence intensity near the inner wall of the bend was not captured by the case with a fully resolved boundary layer, compared with that of the wall function used. Furthermore, it has been confirmed that the same rule was detected also for different curvature ratios, Reynolds numbers, and dimensionless wall distance y+.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Turbulence modelling and numerical flow simulation of turbulent flows
    Wagner, Claus
    WIND ENERGY, 2007, : 65 - 71
  • [12] Flap Side-Edge Noise Simulation Using RANS-based Source Modelling
    Kolb, Alexander
    Mancini, Simone
    Rossignol, Karl-Stephane
    Ewert, Roland
    AIAA AVIATION 2020 FORUM, 2020,
  • [13] Turbulence modelling and turbulent-flow computation in aeronautics
    Leschziner, MA
    Drikakis, D
    AERONAUTICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 106 (1061): : 349 - 384
  • [14] ON TURBULENCE MODELLING AND THE TRANSITION FROM LAMINAR TO TURBULENT FLOW
    Forbes, Lawrence K.
    ANZIAM JOURNAL, 2014, 56 (01): : 28 - 47
  • [15] RANS modelling and LES of particle deposition in a turbulent square duct flow
    Adams, J.
    Fairweather, M.
    Yao, J.
    TURBULENCE, HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER 6, 2009, : 761 - 764
  • [16] Fly ash deposition modelling: Requirements for accurate predictions of particle impaction on tubes using RANS-based computational fluid dynamics
    Weber, Roman
    Schaffel-Mancini, Natalia
    Mancini, Marco
    Kupka, Tomasz
    FUEL, 2013, 108 : 586 - 596
  • [17] Experimental Techniques against RANS Method in a Fully Developed Turbulent Pipe Flow: Evolution of Experimental and Computational Methods for the Study of Turbulence
    Lopez-Santana, Gabriela
    Kennaugh, Andrew
    Keshmiri, Amir
    FLUIDS, 2022, 7 (02)
  • [18] A comparison of RANS-based turbulence modeling and PIV experiments for flow over a simplified road vehicle
    Aksoy, Muharrem Hilmi
    Okbaz, Abdulkerim
    Yagmur, Sercan
    Dogan, Sercan
    JOURNAL OF THE FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE OF GAZI UNIVERSITY, 2023, 38 (03): : 1481 - 1492
  • [19] A grid and flow adaptive wall-function method for RANS turbulence modelling
    Knopp, Tobias
    Alrutz, Thomas
    Schwamborn, Dieter
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2006, 220 (01) : 19 - 40
  • [20] Modelling turbulent flow past a circular cylinder by RANS, URANS, LES and DES
    Benim, A. C.
    Pasqualotto, E.
    Suh, S. H.
    PROGRESS IN COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS, 2008, 8 (05): : 299 - 307