A survey on awareness, knowledge and preferences toward genetic testing among the United States general public

被引:2
作者
Fahim, Shahariar Mohammed [1 ]
Westrick, Salisa C. [2 ]
Qian, Jingjing [2 ]
Ngorsuraches, Surachat [2 ]
Alexander, Courtney S. Watts [3 ]
Lloyd, Kimberly Braxton [3 ]
Hohmann, Natalie S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Inst Clin & Econ Review ICER, Boston, MA 02108 USA
[2] Auburn Univ, Harrison Coll Pharm, Dept Hlth Outcomes Res & Policy, Auburn, AL 36830 USA
[3] Auburn Univ, Harrison Coll Pharm, Dept Pharm Practice, Auburn, AL 36830 USA
关键词
awareness; genetic testing; knowledge; preference; survey; HEALTH-CARE; IMPLEMENTATION; ATTITUDES; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.2217/pme-2023-0106
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Aim: To understand awareness, knowledge and preferences regarding genetic testing among the USA general public. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey using a Qualtrics Panel. Results: Among 1600 respondents, 545 (34%) were White, 411 (26%) Black, 412 (26%) Hispanic or Latin(x) and 232 (15%) Asian. Most had heard of ancestry testing (87%) and genetic health risk testing (69%), but a third thought inherited genes were only a little or not at all responsible for obesity (36%) and mental health (33%). The majority preferred pre-emptive pharmacogenetic testing (n = 74%) compared with reactive testing. Statistically significant differences between racial/ethnic groups and rural-urban respondents were observed. Conclusion: Most preferred pre-emptive pharmacogenetic testing; however, about one-quarter preferred reactive testing. Preferences should be discussed during patient-clinician interactions. What is this study about? This study presents a large online survey among the USA general public to understand their awareness, knowledge and preferences about genetic testing and how this may vary by racial/ethnic group and rural/urban status.What were the results? Most survey respondents had heard of ancestry testing (87%) and genetic health risk testing (69%). However, over a third of respondents thought that inherited genes may be only a little or not at all responsible for obesity (36%) and mental health (33%). When asked about preferences for pre-emptive compared with reactive pharmacogenetic testing, the majority preferred pre-emptive testing (n = 74%). Statistically significant differences between racial/ethnic groups as well as rural-urban respondents were seen.What do the results mean? The US general public may have a different understanding of genetic testing for different diseases, and have different preferences when it comes to the timing of testing. Appropriate educational content targeting the link between genetics and specific diseases should be prepared, and preferences for pre-emptive or reactive testing should be discussed during visits with healthcare providers.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 129
页数:13
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Public perception of predictive cancer genetic testing and research in Oregon [J].
Alvord, Teala W. ;
Marriott, Lisa K. ;
Nguyen, Phuc T. ;
Shafer, Autumn ;
Brown, Kim ;
Stoller, Wesley ;
Volpi, Jennifer L. ;
Vandehey-Guerrero, Jill ;
Ferrara, Laura K. ;
Blakesley, Steven ;
Solomon, Erin ;
Kuehl, Hannah ;
Palma, Amy J. ;
Farris, Paige E. ;
Hamman, Kelly J. ;
Cotter, Madisen ;
Shannon, Jackilen .
JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2020, 29 (02) :259-281
[2]   Trends and Gaps in Awareness of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Tests From 2007 to 2014 [J].
Apathy, Nate C. ;
Menser, Terri ;
Keeran, Lindsay M. ;
Ford, Eric W. ;
Harle, Christopher A. ;
Huerta, Timothy R. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 54 (06) :806-813
[3]  
ASoH Genetics, ASHG Opposes H.R.1313, the Preserving Employee Wellness Programs Act
[4]  
Barlett JE., 2001, Inform. Technol. Learn. Perform. J, V19, P19
[5]   Improving health care by understanding patient preferences: The role of computer technology [J].
Brennan, PF ;
Strombom, I .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 1998, 5 (03) :257-262
[6]   Racial and ethnic differences in knowledge and attitudes about genetic testing in the US: Systematic review [J].
Canedo, Juan R. ;
Miller, Stephania T. ;
Myers, Hector F. ;
Sanderson, Maureen .
JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2019, 28 (03) :587-601
[7]   Validation of screening questions for limited health literacy in a large VA outpatient population [J].
Chew, Lisa D. ;
Griffin, Joan M. ;
Partin, Melissa R. ;
Noorbaloochi, Siamak ;
Grill, Joseph P. ;
Snyder, Annamay ;
Bradley, Katharine A. ;
Nugent, Sean M. ;
Baines, Alisha D. ;
VanRyn, Michelle .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2008, 23 (05) :561-566
[8]   Engaging rural communities in genetic research: challenges and opportunities [J].
Dean C. ;
Fogleman A.J. ;
Zahnd W.E. ;
Lipka A.E. ;
Malhi R.S. ;
Delfino K.R. ;
Jenkins W.D. .
Journal of Community Genetics, 2017, 8 (3) :209-219
[9]   Current published evidence on barriers and proposed strategies for genetic testing implementation in health care settings: A scoping review [J].
Fahim, Shahariar Mohammed ;
Alexander, Courtney S. Watts ;
Qian, Jingjing ;
Ngorsuraches, Surachat ;
Hohmann, Natalie S. ;
Lloyd, Kimberly Braxton ;
Reagan, Adrianna ;
Hart, Lauren ;
McCormick, Nicholas ;
Westrick, Salisa C. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION, 2023, 63 (04) :998-1016
[10]   The role of race and ethnicity in views toward and participation in genetic studies and precision medicine research in the United States: A systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies [J].
Fisher, Elena R. ;
Pratt, Rebekah ;
Esch, Riley ;
Kocher, Megan ;
Wilson, Katie ;
Lee, Whiwon ;
Zierhut, Heather A. .
MOLECULAR GENETICS & GENOMIC MEDICINE, 2020, 8 (02)