Quantitative Imaging Analysis Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Validation for Clinical HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer

被引:2
作者
Wilcock, Diane M. [1 ]
Moore, Kristina H. [1 ]
Rowe, Leslie [1 ]
Mahlow, Jonathan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Jedrzkiewicz, Jolanta [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cleary, Allison S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lomo, Lesley [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ruano, Ana L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gering, Maarika [1 ]
Bradshaw, Derek [1 ]
Maughan, Meghan [1 ]
Tran, Phuong [1 ]
Burlingame, Jesse [1 ]
Davis, Richard
Affolter, Kajsa [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Albertson, Daniel J. [1 ,3 ]
Adelhardt, Parisa [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kim, Jong Take [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Coleman, Joshua F. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Deftereos, Georgios [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gulbahce, Evin H. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sirohi, Deepika [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Inst Expt Pathol, ARUP Labs, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[2] Univ Utah, Dept Pathol, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[3] ARUP Labs, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Pathol, San Francisco, CA USA
[5] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Pathol, 2340 Sutter St, Room N146, San Francisco, CA 94115 USA
关键词
AMERICAN-SOCIETY; RECOMMENDATIONS; AMPLIFICATION;
D O I
10.5858/arpa.2022-0372-OA
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
center dot Context.-Quantitative imaging is a promising tool that is gaining wide use across several areas of pathology. Although there has been increasing adoption of morphologic and immunohistochemical analysis, the adoption of evaluation of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue has been limited because of complexity and lack of practice guidelines. Objective.-To perform human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) FISH validation in breast carcinoma in accordance with the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) 2018 guideline. Design.-Clinical validation of HER2 FISH was performed using the US Food and Drug Administration- California) with digital scanning performed on a PathFusystem. Validation parameters evaluated included z-stacking, classifier, accuracy, precision, software, and hardware settings. Finally, we evaluated the performance of digital enumeration on clinical samples in a real-world setting. Results.-The accuracy samples showed a final concor-dance of 95.3% to 100% across HER2 groups 1 to 5. During clinical implementation for HER2 groups 2, 3, and 4, we achieved a final concordance of 76% (95 of 125). Of these cases, only 8% (10 of 125) had discordances with clinical impact that could be identified algorithmically and triaged for manual review. Conclusions.-Digital FISH enumeration is a useful tool to improve the efficacy of HER2 FISH enumeration and capture genetic heterogeneity across HER2 signals. Ex-cluding cases with high background or poor image quality and manual review of cases with ASCO/CAP group discordances can further improve the efficiency of digital HER2 FISH enumeration.
引用
收藏
页码:1402 / 1412
页数:11
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] 2000 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast and colorectal cancer: Clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
    Bast, RC
    Ravdin, P
    Hayes, DF
    Bates, S
    Fritsche, H
    Jessup, JM
    Kemeny, N
    Locker, GY
    Mennel, RG
    Somerfield, MR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (06) : 1865 - 1878
  • [2] Quantitative Image Analysis of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Immunohistochemistry for Breast Cancer
    Bui, Marilyn M.
    Riben, Michael W.
    Allison, Kimberly H.
    Chlipala, Elizabeth
    Colasacco, Carol
    Kahn, Andrea G.
    Lacchetti, Christina
    Madabhushi, Anant
    Pantanowitz, Liron
    Salama, Mohamed E.
    Stewart, Rachel L.
    Thomas, Nicole E.
    Tomaszewski, John E.
    Hammond, M. Elizabeth
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2019, 143 (10) : 1180 - 1195
  • [3] Validating Whole Slide Imaging Systems for Diagnostic Purposes in Pathology Guideline Update From the College of American Pathologists in Collaboration With the American Society for Clinical Pathology and the Association for Pathology Informatics
    Evans, Andrew J.
    Brown, Richard W.
    Bui, Marilyn M.
    Chlipala, Elizabeth A.
    Lacchetti, Christina
    Milner, Danny A., Jr.
    Pantanowitz, Liron
    Parwani, Anil, V
    Reid, Kearin
    Riben, Michael W.
    Reuter, Victor E.
    Stephens, Lisa
    Stewart, Rachel L.
    Thomas, Nicole E.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2022, 146 (04) : 440 - 450
  • [4] Validation of a new classifier for the automated analysis of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) gene amplification in breast cancer specimens
    Furrer, Daniela
    Jacob, Simon
    Caron, Chantal
    Sanschagrin, Franois
    Provencher, Louise
    Diorio, Caroline
    [J]. DIAGNOSTIC PATHOLOGY, 2013, 8
  • [5] Automated density-based counting of FISH amplification signals for HER2 status assessment
    Hoefener, Henning
    Homeyer, Andre
    Foerster, Mareike
    Drieschner, Norbert
    Schildhaus, Hans-Ulrich
    Hahn, Horst K.
    [J]. COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2019, 173 : 77 - 85
  • [6] Lin L, 2019, AM J CLIN PATHOL, V152, P479, DOI [10.1093/AJCP/AQZ061, 10.1093/ajcp/aqz061]
  • [7] Comparison of automated and manual FISH for evaluation of HER2 gene status on breast carcinoma core biopsies
    Oehlschlegel, Christian
    Kradolfer, Doris
    Hell, Margreth
    Jochum, Wolfram
    [J]. BMC CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2013, 13
  • [8] HER2 in situ hybridization test in breast cancer: quantifying margins of error and genetic heterogeneity
    Polonia, Antonio
    Caramelo, Ana
    [J]. MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2021, 34 (08) : 1478 - 1486
  • [9] Breast cancer evaluation by fluorescent dot detection using combined mathematical morphology and multifractal techniques
    Reljin, Branimir
    Paskas, Milorad
    Reljin, Irini
    Konstanty, Korski
    [J]. DIAGNOSTIC PATHOLOGY, 2011, 6
  • [10] Schunck C, 2011, METHODS MOL BIOL, V724, P91, DOI 10.1007/978-1-61779-055-3_6