Improving communication and patient information recall via a question prompt list: randomized clinical trial

被引:5
作者
Ey, Jesse D. [1 ]
Herath, Matheesha B. [1 ]
Reid, Jessica L. [1 ]
Bradshaw, Emma L. [1 ]
Ting, Ying Yang [1 ]
Treloar, Ellie C. [1 ]
Maddern, Guy J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Queen Elizabeth Hosp, Dept Surg, 28 Woodville Rd, Woodville, SA 5011, Australia
关键词
ADVANCED CANCER-PATIENTS; DIRECTED INTERVENTION; SURGICAL-PATIENTS; DECISION-MAKING; PARTICIPATION; CARE; CONSULTATION; SHEET; KNOWLEDGE; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1093/bjs/znad303
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Patient-surgeon communication is an important component of the success of a consultation and is known to impact patient outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a document called a question prompt list, containing suggested questions that a patient may like to ask their doctor, improved communication.Methods A prospective RCT was conducted from October 2021 to October 2022 at The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, Australia. Patients 16 years or older, seeing a general surgeon for a pre-surgical consultation, not requiring a translator, were randomized to receive a question prompt list (intervention) or standard care without a question prompt list (control). The primary outcomes were number of questions asked, talk time, and mutual eye gaze. Secondary outcomes were patient recall of information, anxiety, and consultation duration. Randomization was achieved using a computer program, with allocation concealment by opaque sequentially numbered envelopes. Patients were blinded to study group; surgeons were aware of study group, but blinded to outcomes.Results Patients (59) were randomly allocated to receive the question prompt list (31) or to the control group (28). A patient from the intervention group withdrew before consultation, resulting in 58 patients being included in the analysis. In the question prompt list consultations, 24 per cent more questions were asked (incidence rate ratio = 1.25, 95 per cent c.i. 1.10 to 1.42; P = 0.001). The intervention group recalled 9 per cent more items than the control group (incidence rate ratio = 1.09, 95 per cent c.i. 1.02 to 1.17; P = 0.012). The control group were 26 per cent less likely to correctly recall information about surgical treatment (OR = 0.26, 95 per cent c.i. 0.10 to 0.68; P = 0.006). No statistically significant differences between study arms for talk time, mutual eye gaze, anxiety, or consultation duration were demonstrated.Conclusion The question prompt list was associated with increased question asking and greater patient recall of medical information. It did not increase patient anxiety or consultation duration.Registration number ACTRN12623000089639 (http://www.ANZCTR.org.au). This RCT demonstrated that the provision of a question prompt list to surgical patients resulted in more questions being asked and in more information being recalled. The question prompt list did not significantly increase consultation duration and had no impact on patient anxiety.
引用
收藏
页码:1793 / 1799
页数:7
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Supporting doctor-patient communication: Providing a question prompt list and audio recording of the consultation as communication aids to outpatients in a cancer clinic [J].
Amundsen, Anita ;
Bergvik, Svein ;
Butow, Phyllis ;
Tattersall, Martin H. N. ;
Sorlie, Tore ;
Nordoy, Tone .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2018, 101 (09) :1594-1600
[2]   PATIENT INFORMATION RECALL IN A RHEUMATOLOGY CLINIC [J].
ANDERSON, JL ;
DODMAN, S ;
KOPELMAN, M ;
FLEMING, A .
RHEUMATOLOGY AND REHABILITATION, 1979, 18 (01) :18-22
[3]   Perception of Helpfulness of a Question Prompt Sheet Among Cancer Patients Attending Outpatient Palliative Care [J].
Arthur, Joseph ;
Yennu, Sriram ;
Zapata, Kresnier Perez ;
Cantu, Hilda ;
Wu, Jimin ;
Liu, Diane ;
Bruera, Eduardo .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2017, 53 (01) :124-U163
[4]  
Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2021, SNAPSH AUSTR
[5]  
Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2022, SNAPSH S AUSTR
[6]   A Question Prompt List for Advanced Cancer Patients Promoting Advance Care Planning: A French Randomized Trial [J].
Bouleuc, Carole ;
Savignoni, Alexia ;
Chevrier, Marion ;
Renault-Tessier, Evelyne ;
Burnod, Alexis ;
Chvetzoff, Gisele ;
Poulain, Phillipe ;
Copel, Laure ;
Cottu, Paul ;
Pierga, Jean-Yves ;
Bredart, Anne ;
Dolbeault, Sylvie .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2021, 61 (02) :331-+
[7]   Promoting patient participation in the cancer consultation: evaluation of a prompt sheet and coaching in question asking [J].
Brown, R ;
Butow, PN ;
Boyer, MJ ;
Tattersall, MHN .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1999, 80 (1-2) :242-248
[8]   Promoting patient participation and shortening cancer consultations: a randomised trial [J].
Brown, RF ;
Butow, P ;
Dunn, SM ;
Tattersall, MHN .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2001, 85 (09) :1273-1279
[9]   PATIENT PARTICIPATION IN THE CANCER CONSULTATION - EVALUATION OF A QUESTION PROMPT SHEET [J].
BUTOW, PN ;
DUNN, SM ;
TATTERSALL, MHN ;
JONES, QJ .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1994, 5 (03) :199-204
[10]   The effect of a Web-based, patient-directed intervention on knowledge, discussion, and completion of a health care proxy [J].
Cintron, Alexie ;
Phillips, Russell ;
Hamel, Mary Beth .
JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2006, 9 (06) :1320-1328