Seismic fragility analysis of containment structure subjected to near fault ground motions

被引:5
作者
Jin, Song [1 ]
Wang, Dongmei [2 ]
Jiang, Di [2 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Univ Technol, Sch Civil Engn & Architecture, Maanshan 243002, Anhui, Peoples R China
[2] China Nucl Power Engn Co Ltd, Beijing 100840, Peoples R China
关键词
Containment structure; Fragility analysis; Energy-based global damage index; Bootstrap resampling procedure; FLING-STEP; MODEL; UNCERTAINTY; VARIABILITY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.pnucene.2023.104734
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
This study presents seismic fragility analysis of the containment structure subjected to near fault ground motion. Prior to perform seismic fragility analysis, 20 near fault ground motion records with pulse characteristics are selected PEER database. Nonlinear dynamic analysis of the containment structure is performed automatically using Matlab scripts and Batch files. To quantify the global damage behavior of the containment structure subjected to near fault ground motion, energy-based global damage index is proposed. The evolution of global damage behavior and tensile damage of the containment structure are analyzed in depth. Goodness of fit for two widely used fragility fitting methods is compared. To quantify the uncertainty in fragility function parameters, Bootstrap resampling procedure and analytical statistical inference method are adopted to estimate the confidence interval of the fragility function parameters. Results indicated that the bottom of containment structure suffered from severe tensile damage and it is most vulnerable location of the containment structure. With the increase of peak ground motion intensity level, tensile damage increases rapidly and extends to higher elevations of the containment structure. The relative error for fragility function parameter (x) over tilde (m) is not more than 4%, and the error of fragility function parameter (beta) over tilde (R) is more than 12%. In general, analytical statistical method provides good estimation for the confidence interval of fragility function parameter (x) over tilde (m), while overestimate the confidence interval of fragility function parameter (beta) over tilde (R).
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Seismic overturning fragility analysis for freestanding building contents subjected to horizontal bidirectional floor motions
    Liu, Pei
    Xue, Wen
    Pang, Hui
    Zhang, Yuan-Ming
    Chen, Hao-Tian
    Yang, Wei-Guo
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2022, 161
  • [42] Fragility analysis and probabilistic performance evaluation of nuclear containment structure subjected to internal pressure
    Jin, Song
    Gong, Jinxin
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2021, 208
  • [43] Assessment of various seismic fragility analysis approaches for structures excited by non-stationary stochastic ground motions
    Cao, Xu-Yang
    Feng, De-Cheng
    Li, Yue
    MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2023, 186
  • [44] Inelastic dynamic response and fragility analysis of arched hydraulic tunnels under as-recorded far-fault and near-fault ground motions
    Sun, Benbo
    Zhang, Sherong
    Deng, Minjiang
    Wang, Chao
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2020, 132
  • [45] Seismic performance evaluation of high CFRD slopes subjected to near-fault ground motions based on generalized probability density evolution method
    Pang, Rui
    Xu, Bin
    Kong, Xianjing
    Zhou, Yang
    Zou, Degao
    ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2018, 246 : 391 - 401
  • [46] Equivalent linear analysis of high-speed railway seismic-isolated bridge subjected to forward rupture directivity type near-fault ground motions
    Chen, L. -K.
    Zhang, N.
    Jia, Q. Y.
    BRIDGE MAINTENANCE, SAFETY, MANAGEMENT AND LIFE EXTENSION, 2014, : 1588 - 1595
  • [47] Seismic Response of Triple Friction Pendulum Bearing under Near-Fault Ground Motions
    Amiri, Gholamreza Ghodrati
    Namiranian, Pejman
    Amiri, Mohamad Shamekhi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL STABILITY AND DYNAMICS, 2016, 16 (06)
  • [48] Seismic fragility analysis based on artificial ground motions and surrogate modeling of validated structural simulators
    Abbiati, Giuseppe
    Broccardo, Marco
    Abdallah, Imad
    Marelli, Stefano
    Paolacci, Fabrizio
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2021, 50 (09) : 2314 - 2333
  • [49] Seismic fragility analysis of a typical Indian PHWR containment: Comparison of fragility models
    Mandal, Tushar K.
    Ghosh, Siddhartha
    Pujari, Nikil N.
    STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2016, 58 : 11 - 19
  • [50] Seismic response of mega buckling-restrained braces subjected to fling-step and forward-directivity near-fault ground motions
    Vafaei, Davoud
    Eskandari, Reyhaneh
    STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF TALL AND SPECIAL BUILDINGS, 2015, 24 (09) : 672 - 686