FAVORITISM IN RUSSIAN ORGANIZATIONS: ANTECEDENTS AND CONSEQUENCES

被引:0
作者
Balabanova, E. S. [1 ]
Portnyagina, A. A. [2 ]
机构
[1] HSE Univ, Moscow, Russia
[2] Carat Russ Media, Moscow, Russia
来源
SOTSIOLOGICHESKIE ISSLEDOVANIYA | 2023年 / 02期
关键词
favoritism; in-group; out-group; leader-member exchange; meritocracy; power in organization; MERITOCRACY; FAVOURITISM; LEADERSHIP;
D O I
10.31857/S013216250022843-0
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
The paper analyzes the phenomenon of managerial favoritism defined as managers' preferences for some of their subordinates, giving them the most favorable treatment at the expense of others. The study is based on two surveys of 1,116 managers and 364 employees. We reveal that the presence of favoritism is positively related to "clannish" type of social organization, with "closed" social network channels of hiring and employee socio-economic dependency from their managers. In organizations with favoritism, the importance of personal sympathies and subjective evaluations of managers is high, and a successful career requires compliance, discipline, and personal loyalty. In contrast, companies without favoritism are characterized by meritocratic type of social organization. They have open hiring channels, performance-based rewards and promotions, and a focus on continually updating the employees' skills. Employees who reported favoritism in their organizations have lower job satisfaction, higher levels of role uncertainty, stress, and intentions to leave. Conversely, the most satisfied, engaged, and happy are those respondents who reported close and trusting relationships with their supervisors and at the same time their equal, not "exclusive", treatment of all subordinates.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 27
页数:12
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Balabanova E. S, 2022, Organizational Behavior, DOI [10.12737/1048688, DOI 10.12737/1048688]
[2]  
[Балабанова Евгения Сергеевна Balabanova Eugene], 2016, [Журнал социологии и социальной антропологии, The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial'noi antropologii], VXIX, P60
[3]   The Paradox of Meritocracy in Organizations [J].
Castilla, Emilio J. ;
Benard, Stephen .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2010, 55 (04) :543-576
[4]   Professionals' supervisor-subordinate relationships, autonomy and commitment in Australia: a leader-member exchange theory perspective [J].
Farr-Wharton, Rod ;
Brunetto, Yvonne ;
Shacklock, Kate .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 2011, 22 (17) :3496-3512
[5]  
Florovskiy S.Yu., VESTNIK UDMURTSKOGO, V28, P228
[6]  
Florovskiy S.Yu, 2012, PSYCHOL MANAGEMENT M, P46
[7]   RELATIONSHIP-BASED APPROACH TO LEADERSHIP - DEVELOPMENT OF LEADER-MEMBER EXCHANGE (LMX) THEORY OF LEADERSHIP OVER 25 YEARS - APPLYING A MULTILEVEL MULTIDOMAIN PERSPECTIVE [J].
GRAEN, GB ;
UHLBIEN, M .
LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 1995, 6 (02) :219-247
[8]   CULTURAL-DIFFERENCES IN TEACHING AND LEARNING [J].
HOFSTEDE, G .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTERCULTURAL RELATIONS, 1986, 10 (03) :301-320
[9]   Coping with Favoritism in Recruitment and Selection: A Communal Perspective [J].
Hotho, Jasper ;
Minbaeva, Dana ;
Muratbekova-Touron, Maral ;
Rabbiosi, Larissa .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2020, 165 (04) :659-679
[10]   Ethnicity and low wage traps: favouritism, homosocial reproduction and economic marginalization [J].
Hudson, Maria ;
Netto, Gina ;
Noon, Mike ;
Sosenko, Filip ;
de Lima, Philomena ;
Kamenou-Aigbekaen, Nicolina .
WORK EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIETY, 2017, 31 (06) :992-1009