Smoking Inequality Trends by Disability and Income in Australia, 2001 to 2020

被引:2
作者
Disney, George [1 ,4 ]
Petrie, Dennis [2 ]
Yang, Yi [1 ]
Aitken, Zoe [1 ]
Gurrin, Lyle [3 ]
Kavanagh, Anne [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Hlth Equ, Melbourne Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Melbourne, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Ctr Hlth Econ, Melbourne, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Epidemiol & Biostat, Melbourne Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Melbourne, Australia
[4] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Bayesian; Disability; Inequalities; Smoking; Socioeconomic status; Uncertainty; SOCIAL DETERMINANTS; HEALTH; TOBACCO; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1097/EDE.0000000000001582
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background:While policies to reduce smoking in many countries have been successful, disadvantaged groups (such as low-income groups) have only seen minor gains. People with disability are one such disadvantaged group and are more likely to smoke. However, evidence is limited on trends and inequalities in smoking for disabled people and on whether those also on low incomes are more likely to smoke. Methods:We use annual data from 2001 to 2020 of the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia survey. We use a Bayesian model to estimate smoking prevalence trends and inequalities for people with disability (2020, n = 1,370) and without disability (2020, n = 6,229) across the whole population and within income tertiles. To avoid reverse causation (smoking causing disability), we focus on younger people (15-44 years). Results:Absolute reductions (per 100 people, [95% credible intervals]) in smoking were similar for people with (-13 [-16, -11]) and without disability (-15 [-16, -14]), with stable absolute but increasing relative inequalities. In the low-income group, absolute reductions in smoking prevalence for people with disability (-10 [-14, -6]) were smaller than in people without disability (-14 [-15, -12]), resulting in moderate evidence for increasing absolute inequalities (4 [0, 8]) and strong evidence for increasing relative inequalities. In high-income groups, disability-related absolute inequalities narrowed (-6 [-10, -3]), and relative inequalities were stable. Conclusions:Disabled people in Australia, especially those on low incomes, show signs of being left behind in efforts to reduce smoking.
引用
收藏
页码:302 / 309
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2002, COMMON LANGUAGE FUNC
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2012, World Health Report
  • [3] Working class matters: Socioeconomic disadvantage, race/ethnicity, gender, and smoking in NHIS 2000
    Barbeau, EM
    Krieger, N
    Soobader, MJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2004, 94 (02) : 269 - 278
  • [4] Tobacco taxes have mixed effects on socioeconomic disparities
    Blakely, Tony
    Gartner, Coral
    [J]. LANCET PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 4 (12) : E595 - E596
  • [5] Blakely T, 2017, EPIDEMIOLOGY, V28, P594, DOI [10.1097/EDE.0000000000000671, 10.1097/ede.0000000000000671]
  • [6] Tobacco taxes as a tobacco control strategy
    Chaloupka, Frank J.
    Yurekli, Ayda
    Fong, Geoffrey T.
    [J]. TOBACCO CONTROL, 2012, 21 (02) : 172 - 180
  • [7] Effectiveness of tax and price policies in tobacco control
    Chaloupka, Frank J.
    Straif, Kurt
    Leon, Maria E.
    [J]. TOBACCO CONTROL, 2011, 20 (03) : 235 - 238
  • [8] Disparities in Current Cigarette Smoking Prevalence by Type of Disability, 2009-2011
    Courtney-Long, Elizabeth
    Stevens, Alissa
    Caraballo, Ralph
    Ramon, Ismaila
    Armour, Brian S.
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTS, 2014, 129 (03) : 252 - 260
  • [9] Hierarchical Models for International Comparisons Smoking, Disability, and Social Inequality in 21 European Countries
    Disney, George
    Gurrin, Lyle
    Aitken, Zoe
    Emerson, Eric
    Milner, Allison
    Kavanagh, Anne
    Petrie, Dennis
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2020, 31 (02) : 282 - 289
  • [10] The health of disabled people and the social determinants of health
    Emerson, E.
    Madden, R.
    Graham, H.
    Llewellyn, G.
    Hatton, C.
    Robertson, J.
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH, 2011, 125 (03) : 145 - 147