Translation and validation of the System Usability Scale to a Dutch version: D-SUS

被引:19
作者
Ensink, Carmen J. [1 ,2 ]
Keijsers, Noel L. W. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Groen, Brenda E. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sint Maartensklin, Dept Res, Hengstdal 3, NL-6574 NA Ubbergen, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Donders Inst Brain Cognit & Behav, Dept Sensorimotor Neurosci, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Donders Inst Brain Cognit & Behav, Dept Rehabil, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
Usability; System Usability Scale; rehabilitation technology; Dutch translation; QUEST;
D O I
10.1080/09638288.2022.2160837
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
PurposeThe System Usability Scale (SUS) is the most commonly used questionnaire to assess usability of healthcare innovations but is not available in Dutch (D-SUS). This study aims to translate the SUS to Dutch and to determine its internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity in healthcare innovations focused on rehabilitation technologies.MethodsTranslation of the SUS was performed according to the WHO recommendations. Fifty-four participants filled out the D-SUS and Dutch Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (D-QUEST) twice. Internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach's alpha. Test-retest reliability was evaluated by Gwet's agreement coefficient (Gwet's AC2) on item scale, and Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) for the overall D-SUS scores. Construct validity was assessed with the PCC between the D-SUS and D-QUEST overall scores (Netherlands Trial Register, ID: NL9169).ResultsAfter translation, Cronbach's alpha was 0.74. Gwet's AC2 was 0.68 and the PCC between the first and second overall D-SUS scores was 0.75. No significant difference in D-SUS score between the two measurements was found. Repeatability coefficient was 18.4. The PCC between the D-SUS and D-QUEST overall scores was 0.49.ConclusionsThe D-SUS is a valid and reliable tool for usability assessment of healthcare innovations, specifically rehabilitation technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 400
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   User's guide to correlation coefficients [J].
Akoglu, Haldun .
TURKISH JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 18 (03) :91-93
[2]   Towards a Standard Arabic System Usability Scale: Psychometric Evaluation using Communication Disorder App [J].
AlGhannam, Bareeq A. ;
Albustan, Sana A. ;
Al-Hassan, Abeer A. ;
Albustan, Lamees A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2018, 34 (09) :799-804
[3]   Design Thinking in Health Care [J].
Altman, Myra ;
Huang, Terry T. K. ;
Breland, Jessica Y. .
PREVENTING CHRONIC DISEASE, 2018, 15
[4]   An empirical evaluation of the System Usability Scale [J].
Bangor, Aaron ;
Kortum, Philip T. ;
Miller, James T. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2008, 24 (06) :574-594
[5]   Pre-testing of Polish Translation of System Usability Scale (SUS) [J].
Borkowska, Anna ;
Jach, Katarzyna .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE AND TECHNOLOGY - ISAT 2016 - PT I, 2017, 521 :143-153
[6]  
Brooke J., 1996, Usability Evaluation in Industry, P189
[7]  
Brooke J, 2013, J USABILITY STUD, V8, P29
[8]  
Demers L., 2000, Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology QUEST 2.0, DOI DOI 10.1037/T35218-000
[9]  
Gliem JA, 2003, MIDW RES TO PRACT C, V1, P82, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-444-88933-1.50023-4
[10]  
Hak T., 2008, Survey Research Methods, V2, P143, DOI DOI 10.18148/SRM/2008.V2I3.1669