Challenges with the current methodology for conducting Endangered Species Act risk assessments for pesticides in the United States

被引:2
作者
Teed, R. Scott [1 ]
Moore, Dwayne R. J. [2 ]
Vukov, Oliver [1 ]
Brain, Richard A. [3 ]
Overmyer, Jay P. [3 ]
机构
[1] Intrinsik Corp, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] Intrinsik Ltd, New Gloucester, ME USA
[3] Syngenta Crop Protect, Greensboro, NC USA
关键词
Endangered species; pesticide regulation; risk assessment; risk models; SALT-MARSH; TOXICITY; INVERTEBRATES; THIAMETHOXAM; BIODIVERSITY; COMMUNITIES; INSECTICIDE; MALATHION; ECOLOGY; WEIGHT;
D O I
10.1002/ieam.4713
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA or the Agency) is responsible for administering the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). The Agency is also required to assess the potential risks of pesticides undergoing registration or re-registration to threatened and endangered (i.e., listed) species to ensure compliance with the Endangered Species Act. To assess potential risks to listed species, a screening-level risk assessment in the form of a biological evaluation (BE) is undertaken by the Agency for each pesticide. Given the large number of registration actions handled by the USEPA annually, efficient tools for conducting BEs are desirable. However, the "Revised Method" that is the basis for the USEPA's BE process has been ineffective at filtering out listed species and critical habitats that are at de minimis risk to pesticides. In the USEPA's BEs, the Magnitude of Effect Tool (MAGtool) has been used to determine potential risks to listed species that potentially co-occur with pesticide footprints. The MAGtool is a highly prescriptive, high-throughput compilation of existing FIFRA screening-level models with a geospatial interface. The tool has been a significant contributor to risk inflation and ultimately process inefficiency. The ineffectiveness of the tool stems from compounding conservatism, unrealistic and unreasonable assumptions regarding usage, limited application of species-specific data, lack of consideration of multiple lines of evidence, and inability to integrate higher-tier data. Here, we briefly describe the MAGtool and the critical deficiencies that impair its effectiveness, thus undermining its intention. Case studies are presented to highlight the deficiencies and solutions are recommended for improving listed species assessments in the future. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2022;00:1-13. (c) 2022 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).
引用
收藏
页码:817 / 829
页数:13
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
Anderson P., 2004, ECOLOGY PUBLICATION, V04
[2]  
Anderson P., 2007, ECOLOGY PUBLICATION, V07
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1970, WILDLIFE MONOGR
[4]  
BEISSINGER SR, 1988, HDB N AM BIRDS, V4, P148
[5]  
Bias MA, 1999, SOUTHWEST NAT, V44, P348
[6]   Introduction to SWAT plus , A Completely Restructured Version of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool [J].
Bieger, Katrin ;
Arnold, Jeffrey G. ;
Rathjens, Hendrik ;
White, Michael J. ;
Bosch, David D. ;
Allen, Peter M. ;
Volk, Martin ;
Srinivasan, Raghavan .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2017, 53 (01) :115-130
[7]   The agro-enabled urban revolution, pesticides, politics, and popular culture: a case study of land use, birds, and insecticides in the USA [J].
Brain, Richard A. ;
Anderson, Julie C. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2019, 26 (21) :21717-21735
[8]   Risk Assessment Considerations With Regard to the Potential Impacts of Pesticides on Endangered Species [J].
Brain, Richard A. ;
Teed, R. Scott ;
Bang, JiSu ;
Thorbek, Pernille ;
Perine, Jeff ;
Peranginangin, Natalia ;
Kim, Myoungwoo ;
Valenti, Ted ;
Chen, Wenlin ;
Breton, Roger L. ;
Rodney, Sara I. ;
Moore, Dwayne R. J. .
INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 11 (01) :102-117
[9]   Submerged Macrophytes Mitigate Direct and Indirect Insecticide Effects in Freshwater Communities [J].
Brogan, William R., III ;
Relyea, Rick A. .
PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (05)
[10]  
Brylski P., 1999, DEER MOUSE