What drives more for macroeconomic instability-carbon inequality or income inequality? Panel evidence from emerging economies

被引:2
作者
Sahu, Anjan Kumar [1 ]
Mahalik, Mantu Kumar [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Kharagpur, Dept Humanities & Social Sci, Kharagpur 721302, West Bengal, India
关键词
Macroeconomic volatility; Carbon disparity; Economic inequality; Autoregressive distributed lag; Feasible generalized least squares; GOVERNMENT SIZE; GROWTH; VOLATILITY; CRISES;
D O I
10.1007/s10668-023-04455-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Macroeconomic instability poses a significant risk that casts a shadow over the economy, environment, and society. Climate change and environmental degradation are risks to society subject to macroeconomic instability. Nevertheless, few studies have investigated the connection between macroeconomic volatility and ecological degradation, but the impact of inequality in emissions and income on macroeconomic instability remains untouched, especially in emerging economies. This study utilizes a balanced panel data of 22 emerging economies from 1996 to 2019 to unveil the effect of carbon and income inequality on macroeconomic instability. As control variables, we incorporate government expenditure, bank credit, and governance into the macroeconomic instability function. The outcomes of the baseline PMG-ARDL model imply that both carbon inequality and income inequality instigate macroeconomic instability. However, income inequality impedes macroeconomic stability more than carbon inequality. In addition, the results demonstrate that government expenditure reduces macroeconomic instability, whereas bank credit intensifies it. The results of FGLS estimation are also robust to the baseline model. These findings encourage policymakers in emerging economies to use various fiscal instruments to improve economic and environmental resilience and reduce carbon emissions and income inequality.
引用
收藏
页码:12653 / 12676
页数:24
相关论文
共 68 条
[21]   Inequality and growth: Why differential fertility matters [J].
de la Croix, D ;
Doepke, M .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2003, 93 (04) :1091-1113
[22]   Monetary policy efficiency and macroeconomic stability: Do financial openness and economic globalization matter? [J].
de Mendonca, Helder Ferreira ;
Nascimento, Natalia Cunha .
NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2020, 51
[23]   Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels [J].
Dumitrescu, Elena-Ivona ;
Hurlin, Christophe .
ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2012, 29 (04) :1450-1460
[24]  
Easterly W, 2000, ANN WB CONF DEV ECON, P191
[25]   Government size and automatic stabilizers:: international and intranational evidence [J].
Fatás, A ;
Mihov, I .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 55 (01) :3-28
[26]   A reassessment of the relationship between inequality and growth [J].
Forbes, KJ .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2000, 90 (04) :869-887
[28]   GOVERNMENT SIZE AND MACROECONOMIC STABILITY [J].
GALI, J .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1994, 38 (01) :117-132
[29]   INCOME-DISTRIBUTION AND MACROECONOMICS [J].
GALOR, O ;
ZEIRA, J .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1993, 60 (01) :35-52
[30]   The injustice of inequality [J].
Glaeser, E ;
Scheinkman, J ;
Shleifer, A .
JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, 2003, 50 (01) :199-222