When structural reforms of labor markets harm productivity. Evidence from the German IAB panel

被引:3
作者
Hoxha, Sergei [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Kleinknecht, Alfred [2 ,7 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Gouwestr 17, NL-3522 CH Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Pk Klinkenberg 53, NL-2361 WZ Warmond, Netherlands
[3] Hans Bockler Stiftung, Dusseldorf, Germany
[4] Erasmus Univ, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[5] Univ Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
[6] European Cent Bank, Eurotower, Kaiserstr 17, D-60311 Frankfurt, Germany
[7] Delft Univ Technol, Delft, Netherlands
[8] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[9] Kwansei Gakuin Univ, Sch Econ, Nishinomiya, Japan
关键词
EMPLOYMENT PROTECTION; FIRM-LEVEL; TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT; INNOVATION EVIDENCE; FLEXIBLE LABOR; FLEXIBILITY; IMPACT; WAGES; UNEMPLOYMENT; RIGIDITIES;
D O I
10.1093/icc/dtad060
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We find firm-level evidence that removing labor market rigidities can harm productivity growth. This holds, in particular, in industries with a high 'cumulativeness' of knowledge, i.e., when accumulation of worker-embodied (and often 'tacit') knowledge from experience is important for innovative competencies. We conclude that there is a trade-off between the efficient allocation of scarce resources in a static neoclassical perspective and dynamic Schumpeterian efficiency, the latter requiring rigidities in labor markets that are valuable for innovation.
引用
收藏
页码:541 / 554
页数:14
相关论文
共 48 条