Dose-response relationship between alcohol consumption and workplace absenteeism in Australia

被引:3
作者
Marzan, Melvin Barrientos [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Callinan, Sarah [1 ]
Livingston, Michael [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Jiang, Heng [1 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] La Trobe Univ, Ctr Alcohol Policy Res, Melbourne, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Med Sch, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Melbourne, Australia
[3] Murdoch Childrens Res Inst, Reprod Epidemiol Grp, Melbourne, Australia
[4] Curtin Univ, Natl Drug Res Inst, Perth, Australia
[5] Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Neurosci, Stockholm, Sweden
[6] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Hlth Equ, Melbourne Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Melbourne, Australia
[7] LA Trobe Univ, Sch Psychol & Publ Hlth, Melbourne, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
absenteeism; alcohol consumption; Australia; employee; workplace; SICKNESS ABSENCE; YOUNG EMPLOYEES; SOCIAL ROLES; DRINKING; ASSOCIATION; PREDICTORS; GENDER; IMPACT; SEX;
D O I
10.1111/dar.13726
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Workplace absenteeism is a burden in Australia. The estimated productivity losses due to alcohol were around $4.0 billion in 2017, with absenteeism driving 90% of these costs. We aim to determine the dose-response relationship between average daily alcohol consumption and heavy episodic drinking (HED) frequency and workplace absenteeism amongst Australian workers.Methods: We used the 2019 National Drug Strategy Household Survey of Australian employed workers aged =20 years to 69 years old. Respondents' average daily alcohol consumption was categorised into four: abstainers, light to moderate (1-20 g of alcohol/day), risky (>20-40 g of alcohol/day) and high-risk (>40 g of alcohol/day). HED was classified into four frequency measures (never, less than monthly, monthly, weekly). The outcome variables came from dichotomised measures of: (i) absence due to alcohol consumption; and (ii) broader sickness absence-absence due to illness or injury in the previous 3 months.Results: Risky (adjusted odds ratio 4.74 [95% CI 2.93-7.64]) and high-risk drinking (adjusted odds ratio 6.61 [95% CI 4.10-10.68]) were linked to increased odds of alcohol-related absence. Higher HED frequency was significantly associated with alcohol-related and broader sickness absenteeism. No significant associations exist between regular alcohol consumption and broader sickness absence in fully adjusted models.Discussion and Conclusions: Findings suggest that only HED is linked to broader sickness absence. However, there is a strong dose-response association between alcohol consumption and alcohol-related absences for both consumption measures amongst Australian workers. Population-level policies that reduce alcohol consumption to moderate level and less frequent HED might address workplace absenteeism.
引用
收藏
页码:1773 / 1784
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The influence of alcohol consumption on sickness presenteeism and impaired daily activities. The WIRUS screening study
    Aas, Randi Wago
    Haveraaen, Lise
    Sagvaag, Hildegunn
    Thorrisen, Mikkel Magnus
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (10):
  • [2] Angus C., 2016, Minimum Unit Pricing and taxation policies in Scotland
  • [3] Askgaard G., 2020, SOCIOECONOMIC INEQUA
  • [4] Australian Council on Trade Unions A, 2006, ALCOHOL OTHER DRUGS
  • [5] Australian Institute of Health Welfare, 2017, NAT DRUG STRAT HOUS
  • [6] Australian Institute of Health Welfare A, 2019, NATL DRUG STRATEGY H, V2020, P2020
  • [7] Deconstructing the Alcohol Harm Paradox: A Population Based Survey of Adults in England
    Beard, Emma
    Brown, Jamie
    West, Robert
    Angus, Colin
    Brennan, Alan
    Holmes, John
    Kaner, Eileen
    Meier, Petra
    Michie, Susan
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (09):
  • [8] Bloomfield K, 2020, LANCET PUBLIC HEALTH, V5, pE300, DOI 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30119-5
  • [9] ALCOHOL-CONSUMPTION AND WORK PERFORMANCE
    BLUM, TC
    ROMAN, PM
    MARTIN, JK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STUDIES ON ALCOHOL, 1993, 54 (01): : 61 - 70
  • [10] Standardization of alcohol calculations in research
    Brick, John
    [J]. ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2006, 30 (08) : 1276 - 1287