Self-assessment of well-being and individual attitudes towards inequality

被引:0
作者
Nikolskaya, Anastasia [1 ]
Butorina, Galina [2 ]
Gareev, Roman [3 ]
Podbiralina, Galina [3 ]
Mrochkovsky, Nikolay [3 ]
机构
[1] Moscow State Univ Design & Technol, Psychol, Moscow, Russia
[2] Northern Trans Ural State Agr Univ, Econ, Moscow, Russia
[3] Plekhanov Russian Univ Econ, Econ, Moscow, Russia
来源
AMAZONIA INVESTIGA | 2023年 / 12卷 / 65期
关键词
economic inequality; meritocratic and non-meritocratic factors of economic success; income distribution; subjective well-being; INCOME-DISTRIBUTION; LIFE SATISFACTION; HAPPINESS; CONSEQUENCES; PREFERENCES;
D O I
10.34069/AI/2023.65.05.12
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The problem of social inequality is a relevant subject of research, since in many ways all kinds of protest movements arise in the society when its different segments and groups feel and experience social injustice. The individual's disadvantaged position in the society at present and his/her willingness to change it against the inability to do it is an important indicator of social instability. However, people's perception of social injustice and inequality is different. The purpose of the present study is to explore the causes of economic inequality in Russia, as viewed by the population, as well as the attitudes to fairness of economic inequality and subjective assessment of one's own chances of material success. The paper identifies the factors that influence subjective assessment of a person's own chances. In the opinion of the population, it is non-meritocratic forms that are predominant in the Russian society. It was found that dissatisfaction with inequality is lower among the people who are poor today but contemplate to become rich in the future than among those who apprehend of becoming poor both now and in the future. It is shown that the individual's subjective rank in income distribution is more important for one's subjective well-being than the relative wage level.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 130
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Towards a Benefits Theory of Leisure Well-Being [J].
M. Joseph Sirgy ;
Muzaffer Uysal ;
Stefan Kruger .
Applied Research in Quality of Life, 2017, 12 :205-228
[32]   Individual Subjective Well-Being during the COVID-19 Pandemic [J].
Long, Trinh Q. .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (14)
[33]   Moving Towards Positive Well-Being in the Face of Adversity: What Explains Individual Variations in Well-Being Following Job Loss? [J].
Synard, Jacqueline ;
Gazzola, Nicola .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COUNSELLING, 2019, 41 (03) :415-435
[34]   Collective and Individual Self-Esteem Mediate the Effect of Self-Construals on Subjective Well-Being of Undergraduate Students in China [J].
Yu, Xiaobo ;
Zhou, Ziheng ;
Fan, Guanhua ;
Yu, Yangyang ;
Peng, Jiaxi .
APPLIED RESEARCH IN QUALITY OF LIFE, 2016, 11 (01) :209-219
[35]   Income inequality and subjective well-being: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Ngamaba, Kayonda Hubert ;
Panagioti, Maria ;
Armitage, Christopher J. .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2018, 27 (03) :577-596
[36]   Subjective Well-Being Analysis of Income Inequality: Evidence for the Industrialized and Emerging Economies [J].
Beja, Edsel L., Jr. .
APPLIED RESEARCH IN QUALITY OF LIFE, 2014, 9 (02) :139-156
[37]   Income inequality and subjective well-being: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Kayonda Hubert Ngamaba ;
Maria Panagioti ;
Christopher J. Armitage .
Quality of Life Research, 2018, 27 :577-596
[38]   Subjective well-being and attitudes toward outgroup members [J].
Prati, Gabriele .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTERCULTURAL RELATIONS, 2024, 103
[39]   Immigration Attitudes and Subjective Well-Being: A Matter of Identity? [J].
Heinz Welsch ;
Philipp Bierman ;
Jan Kühling .
Journal of Happiness Studies, 2021, 22 :1563-1581
[40]   Well-being balance and lived experiences assessment: a valid, comprehensive measure of positive well-being [J].
McDermott, Ashley F. ;
Brydges, Christopher R. ;
Norris, Troy W. .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 15