Three-dimensional comparison of tooth-borne and tooth-bone-borne RME appliances: a randomized controlled trial with 5-year follow-up

被引:5
作者
Bazargani, Farhan [1 ,2 ]
Knode, Vanessa
Plaksin, Alexander
Magnuson, Anders [3 ]
Ludwig, Bjoern [4 ]
机构
[1] Postgrad Dent Educ Ctr, Dept Orthodont, POB 1126, SE-70111 Orebro, Sweden
[2] Orebro Univ, Fac Med & Hlth, Sch Med Sci, SE-70182 Orebro, Sweden
[3] Orebro Univ, Fac Med & Hlth, Sch Med Sci, Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Orebro, Sweden
[4] Univ Saarland, Dept Orthodont, Homburg, Germany
关键词
RAPID MAXILLARY EXPANSION; SUPERIMPOSITION; MODELS;
D O I
10.1093/ejo/cjad024
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives To compare the long-term skeletal effects of tooth-borne (TB) and tooth-bone-borne (TBB) rapid maxillary expansion in growing children, using 3D imaging. Materials and methods In total, 52 consecutive patients who met the eligibility criteria were recruited and allocated to either the TB group, mean age 9.3 years (SD 1.3), or the TBB group, mean age 9.5 years (SD 1.2). Cone-beam computed tomography records and plaster models were taken before (T-0), directly after (T-1), 1 year after (T-2), and 5 years after expansion (T-3). Randomization Participants were randomly allocated in blocks of different sizes, using the concealed allocation principle in a 1:1 ratio. The randomization list was also stratified by sex to ensure homogeneity between groups. Blinding Due to clinical limitations, only the outcome assessors were blinded to the groups to which the patients were allocated. Results At T-1, the midpalatal suture at its anterior part showed a statistically significant difference between the groups with a mean of 0.6 mm (CI 0.2-1.1) more expansion in the TBB group (P < 0.01). This difference was also more evident in boys at T-1 with a mean of 0.8 mm (CI 0.2-1.4) (P < 0.01). These differences, however, blotted out at T-2 and T-3. The nasal width also showed similar differences between the groups, with a significantly larger expansion in the TBB group by a mean of 0.7 mm (CI 0.1-1.4) (P = 0.03). This group difference in favour of the TBB group was maintained at T-2 (1.6 mm) and T-3 (2.1 mm) (P < 0.01 T-2 and T-3, respectively). Conclusions Skeletal expansion in the midpalatal suture was significantly higher in the TBB group; however, the magnitude of this expansion was around 0.6 mm more and may not be clinically significant. Skeletal expansion at the level of the nasal cavity was significantly higher in the TBB group. There were no differences between boys and girls with regard to skeletal expansion.
引用
收藏
页码:690 / 702
页数:13
相关论文
共 23 条
[11]   Skeletal effects to the maxilla after rapid maxillary expansion assessed with cone-beam computed tomography [J].
Garrett, Brett J. ;
Caruso, Joseph M. ;
Rungcharassaeng, Kitichai ;
Farrage, James R. ;
Kim, Jay S. ;
Taylor, Guy D. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2008, 134 (01) :8.e1-8.e11
[12]   Skeletally-anchored rapid maxillary expansion using the Dresden Distractor [J].
Hansen, Lars ;
Tausche, Eve ;
Hietschold, Volker ;
Hotan, Thorsten ;
Lagravere, Manuel ;
Harzer, Winfried .
JOURNAL OF OROFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS-FORTSCHRITTE DER KIEFERORTHOPADIE, 2007, 68 (02) :148-158
[13]   Effect and stability of miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Huang, Xinyi ;
Han, Yu ;
Yang, Shuangyan .
KOREAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2022, 52 (05) :334-344
[14]   Tooth-borne versus bone-borne rapid maxillary expansion for transverse maxillary deficiency: A systematic review [J].
Khosravi, Mandieh ;
Ugolini, Alessandro ;
Miresmaeili, Amirfarhang ;
Mirzaei, Hamed ;
Shahidi-Zandi, Vahid ;
Soheilifar, Sepideh ;
Karami, Manoochehr ;
Mahmoudzadeh, Majid .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHODONTICS, 2019, 17 (03) :425-436
[15]   Tomographic evaluation of the maturation stage of the midpalatal suture in postadolescents [J].
Ladewig, Victor de Miranda ;
Capelozza-Filho, Leopoldino ;
Almeida-Pedrin, Renata Rodrigues ;
Guedes, Fabio Pinto ;
Cardoso, Mauricio de Almeida ;
de Castro Ferreira Conti, Ana Caudia .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2018, 153 (06) :818-824
[16]  
Lagravere MO, 2005, ANGLE ORTHOD, V75, P1046
[17]   Tooth-borne vs bone-borne rapid maxillary expanders in late adolescence [J].
Lin, Lu ;
Ahn, Hyo-Won ;
Kim, Su-Jung ;
Moon, Sung-Chul ;
Kim, Seong-Hun ;
Nelson, Gerald .
ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2015, 85 (02) :253-262
[18]   Three-dimensional assessment of palatal area changes after posterior crossbite correction with tooth-borne and tooth bone-borne rapid maxillary expansion: A randomized controlled trial with 5-year follow-up [J].
Malmvind, Damir ;
Golez, Aljaz ;
Magnuson, Anders ;
Ovsenik, Maja ;
Bazargani, Farhan .
ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2022, 92 (05) :589-597
[19]  
Martos-Cobo Eva, 2022, J Clin Exp Dent, V14, pe769, DOI 10.4317/jced.59750
[20]   Comparison of transverse changes during maxillary expansion with 4-point bone-borne and tooth-borne maxillary expanders [J].
Mosleh, Mennatallah Ihab ;
Kaddah, Mohamed Amgad ;
Abd ElSayed, Fatma Abdou ;
ElSayed, Hend Salah .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2015, 148 (04) :599-607