Diagnostic Performance of a Tablet Computer-Based Cognitive Screening Test for Identification of Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment

被引:4
作者
Na, Seunghee [1 ]
Lee, Eek-Sung [2 ]
Lee, Tae-Kyeong [2 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Incheon St Marys Hosp, Dept Neurol, Incheon, South Korea
[2] Soonchunhyang Univ, Bucheon Hosp, Dept Neurol, 170 Jomaru Ro, Bucheon 14584, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Neurocognitive Test; Computerized Cognitive Test; Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment; Alzheimer Disease; DISEASE; MEMORY; DEMENTIA; MCI;
D O I
10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e131
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Early and appropriate diagnosis of amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) is clinically important because aMCI is considered the prodromal stage of dementia caused by Alzheimer's disease (AD). aMCI is assessed using the comprehensive neuropsychological (NP) battery, but it is rater-dependent and does not provide quick results. Thus, we investigated the performance of the computerized cognitive screening test (Inbrain Cognitive Screening Test; Inbrain CST) in the diagnosis of aMCI and compared its performance to that of the Korean version of the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD) test (CERAD-K), a comprehensive and pencil-and-paper NP test.Methods: A total of 166 participants were included in this cross-sectional study. The participants were recruited as part of a prospective, community-based cohort study for MCI (PREcision medicine platform for mild cognitive impairment on multi-omics, imaging, evidence-based R & BD; PREMIER). All participants were assessed using the CERAD-K and the Inbrain CST. The Inbrain CST comprised seven subtests that assessed the following five cognitive domains: attention, language, visuospatial, memory, and executive functions. Seventy-six participants underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging and [18F]-flutemetamol positron emission tomography (PET). We evaluated the diagnostic performance of the Inbrain CST for the identification of aMCI by comparing the findings with those of CERAD-K. We also determined the characteristics of aMCI patients as defined by the CERAD-K and Inbrain CST.Results: Of the 166 participants, 93 were diagnosed with aMCI, while 73 were cognitively unimpaired. The sensitivity of the Inbrain CST for aMCI diagnosis was 81.7%, and its specificity was 84.9%. Positive and negative predictive values were 87.4% and 78.5%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy was 83.1%, and the error rate was 16.9%. Demographic and clinical characteristics between individuals with aMCI defined by the Inbrain CST and CERAD-K were not significantly different. The frequency of positive amyloid PET scan, the hippocampal/ parahippocampal volumes, and AD signature cortical thickness did not differ between the patients with aMCI defined by CERAD-K and those with aMCI defined by the Inbrain CST.Conclusion: The Inbrain CST showed sufficient sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for diagnosing objective memory impairment in aMCI. In addition, aMCI patients identified by CERAD-K and the Inbrain CST showed comparable clinical and neuroimaging characteristics. Therefore, the Inbrain CST can be considered an alternative test to supplement the limitations of existing pencil-and-paper NP tests.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Telemedicine: a Valuable Tool in Neurodegenerative Diseases [J].
Adams, Jamie L. ;
Myers, Taylor L. ;
Waddell, Emma M. ;
Spear, Kelsey L. ;
Schneider, Ruth B. .
CURRENT GERIATRICS REPORTS, 2020, 9 (02) :72-81
[2]   Clinical core of the Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative: Progress and plans [J].
Aisen, Paul S. ;
Petersen, Ronald C. ;
Donohue, Michael C. ;
Gamst, Anthony ;
Raman, Rema ;
Thomas, Ronald G. ;
Walter, Sarah ;
Trojanowski, John Q. ;
Shaw, Leslie M. ;
Beckett, Laurel A. ;
Jack, Clifford R., Jr. ;
Jagust, William ;
Toga, Arthur W. ;
Saykin, Andrew J. ;
Morris, John C. ;
Green, Robert C. ;
Weiner, Michael W. .
ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA, 2010, 6 (03) :239-246
[3]   Diagnostic performance of digital cognitive tests for the identification of MCI and dementia: A systematic review [J].
Chan, Joyce Y. C. ;
Yau, Sarah T. Y. ;
Kwok, Timothy C. Y. ;
Tsoi, Kelvin K. F. .
AGEING RESEARCH REVIEWS, 2021, 72
[4]   A Validation Study of the Inbrain CST: a Tablet Computer-based Cognitive Screening Test for Elderly People with Cognitive Impairment [J].
Chin, Juhee ;
Kim, Da Eun ;
Lee, Hyejoo ;
Yun, Juoh ;
Lee, Byung Hwa ;
Park, Jongha ;
Yeom, Jiho ;
Shin, Dae Seock ;
Na, Duk L. .
JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 35 (34)
[5]   Amnestic MCI or prodromal Alzheimer's disease? [J].
Dubois, B ;
Albert, ML .
LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2004, 3 (04) :246-248
[6]   Early versus late MCI: Improved MCI staging using a neuropsychological approach [J].
Edmonds, Emily C. ;
McDonald, Carrie R. ;
Marshall, Anisa ;
Thomas, Kelsey R. ;
Eppig, Joel ;
Weigand, Alexandra J. ;
Delano-Wood, Lisa ;
Galasko, Douglas R. ;
Salmon, David P. ;
Bondi, Mark W. .
ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA, 2019, 15 (05) :699-708
[7]   Which MCI Patients Should be Included in Prodromal Alzheimer Disease Clinical Trials? [J].
Grill, Joshua D. ;
Nuno, Michelle M. ;
Gillen, Daniel L. .
ALZHEIMER DISEASE & ASSOCIATED DISORDERS, 2019, 33 (02) :104-112
[8]  
Ho SeongHee, 2022, Dement Neurocogn Disord, V21, P147, DOI 10.12779/dnd.2022.21.4.147
[9]   Different definitions of neurodegeneration produce similar amyloid/neurodegeneration biomarker group findings [J].
Jack, Clifford R., Jr. ;
Wiste, Heather J. ;
Weigand, Stephen D. ;
Knopman, David S. ;
Mielke, Michelle M. ;
Vemuri, Prashanthi ;
Lowe, Val ;
Senjem, Matthew L. ;
Gunter, Jeffrey L. ;
Reyes, Denise ;
Machulda, Mary M. ;
Roberts, Rosebud ;
Petersen, Ronald C. .
BRAIN, 2015, 138 :3747-3759
[10]   Quantification of Five Neuropsychological Approaches to Defining Mild Cognitive Impairment [J].
Jak, Amy J. ;
Bondi, Mark W. ;
Delano-Wood, Lisa ;
Wierenga, Christina ;
Corey-Bloom, Jody ;
Salmon, David P. ;
Delis, Dean C. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2009, 17 (05) :368-375