Difference in auditory time-to-contact estimation between the rear and other directions

被引:1
作者
Teraoka, Ryo [1 ,2 ]
Hayashida, Yushiro [3 ]
Teramoto, Wataru [1 ]
机构
[1] Kumamoto Univ, Fac Humanities & Social Sci Psychol, 2-40-1 Kurokami, Chuo Ku, Kumamoto 8608555, Japan
[2] Japan Soc Promot Sci, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Kumamoto Univ, Fac Letters, 2-40-1 Kurokami, Chuo Ku, Kumamoto 8608555, Japan
关键词
Time -to -contact estimation; Auditory distance perception; Auditory looming; Rear space; DISTANCE PERCEPTION;
D O I
10.1250/ast.44.77
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Time-to-contact estimation is essential for individuals to avoid collision with externally moving objects. Although the auditory system plays an important role in detecting events from all directions around listeners including events out of sight, it is still unclear how the auditory system contributes to the time-to-contact judgment. The present study investigated whether the auditory time -to-contact changed depending on the direction of the approaching sound (0 degrees, 45 degrees, 90 degrees, 135 degrees, or 180 degrees). The results demonstrated that auditory time-to-contact judgments were underestimated compared to actual auditory time-to-contact for all directions, thus replicating the classical time-to-contact underestimation effect. In contrast, the trends observed for the auditory time-to-contact judgment for a sound stimulus approaching from behind differed from those approaching from the front, even though the auditory distance localization performance did not differ for the different angles. This difference in estimation between the sound approaching from the rear and other directions could be attributed to the sound coming from behind being more emotionally negative than the sound coming from the front.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 83
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Aggius-Vella E., 2022, HEARING RES, V417
  • [2] Comparison of auditory spatial bisection and minimum audible angle in front, lateral, and back space
    Aggius-Vella, Elena
    Kolarik, Andrew J.
    Gori, Monica
    Cirstea, Silvia
    Campus, Claudio
    Moore, Brian C. J.
    Pardhan, Shahina
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [3] Attentional and Emotional Prioritization of the Sounds Occurring Outside the Visual Field
    Asutay, Erkin
    Vaestfjaell, Daniel
    [J]. EMOTION, 2015, 15 (03) : 281 - 286
  • [4] Auditory distance perception in rooms
    Bronkhorst, AW
    Houtgast, T
    [J]. NATURE, 1999, 397 (6719) : 517 - 520
  • [5] Direct-location versus verbal report methods for measuring auditory distance perception in the far field
    Etchemendy, Pablo E.
    Spiousas, Ignacio
    Calcagno, Esteban R.
    Abregu, Ezequiel
    Eguia, Manuel C.
    Vergara, Ramiro O.
    [J]. BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2018, 50 (03) : 1234 - 1247
  • [6] Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses
    Faul, Franz
    Erdfelder, Edgar
    Buchner, Axel
    Lang, Albert-Georg
    [J]. BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2009, 41 (04) : 1149 - 1160
  • [7] Rear negativity: Verbal messages coming from behind are perceived as more negative
    Frankowska, Natalia
    Parzuchowski, Michal
    Wojciszke, Bogdan
    Olszanowski, Michal
    Winkielman, Piotr
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 50 (04) : 889 - 902
  • [8] Gamble E.A., 1909, Psychol. Rev, V16, P416
  • [9] DISTANCE ESTIMATION OF 0 DEGREES OR APPARENT 0 DEGREES -ORIENTED SPEECH SIGNALS IN ANECHOIC SPACE
    GARDNER, MB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1969, 45 (01) : 47 - +
  • [10] VISUALLY CONTROLLED LOCOMOTION AND VISUAL ORIENTATION IN ANIMALS
    GIBSON, JJ
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1958, 49 (03) : 182 - 194