Modeling Wildland Firefighters' Assessments of Structure Defensibility

被引:1
作者
Heeren, Alexander J. [1 ]
Dennison, Philip E. [1 ]
Campbell, Michael J. [1 ]
Thompson, Matthew P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Dept Geog, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[2] US Forest Serv, USDA, Rocky Mt Res Stn, Ft Collins, CO 80526 USA
来源
FIRE-SWITZERLAND | 2023年 / 6卷 / 12期
关键词
structure triage; structure defensibility; safety zone; wildland urban interface (WUI); machine learning; firefighter decision-making; URBAN INTERFACE; SAFETY ZONES; FIRE; WILDFIRES; RISK;
D O I
10.3390/fire6120474
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
In wildland-urban interface areas, firefighters balance wildfire suppression and structure protection. These tasks are often performed under resource limitations, especially when many structures are at risk. To address this problem, wildland firefighters employ a process called "structure triage" to prioritize structure protection based on perceived defensibility. Using a dataset containing triage assessments of thousands of structures within the Western US, we developed a machine learning model that can improve the understanding of factors contributing to assessed structure defensibility. Our random forest models utilized variables collected by wildland firefighters, including structural characteristics and the surrounding ignition zone. The models also used landscape variables not contained within the triage dataset that captured important information about accessibility, vegetation, topography, and structure density. We achieved a high overall accuracy (77.8%) in classifying structures as defensible or non-defensible. The presence of a safety zone was the most important factor in determining structure defensibility. Road proximity, vegetation composition, and topography were also found to have high importance. In addition to improving the understanding of factors considered by wildland firefighters, communities could also gain from this information by enhancing their wildfire response plans, focusing on targeted mitigation, and improving their overall preparedness.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] Factors related to building loss due to wildfires in the conterminous United States
    Alexandre, Patricia M.
    Stewart, Susan I.
    Keuler, Nicholas S.
    Clayton, Murray K.
    Mockrin, Miranda H.
    Bar-Massada, Avi
    Syphard, Alexandra D.
    Radeloff, Volker C.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2016, 26 (07) : 2323 - 2338
  • [2] The relative impacts of vegetation, topography and spatial arrangement on building loss to wildfires in case studies of California and Colorado
    Alexandre, Patricia M.
    Stewart, Susan I.
    Mockrin, Miranda H.
    Keuler, Nicholas S.
    Syphard, Alexandra D.
    Bar-Massada, Avi
    Clayton, Murray K.
    Radeloff, Volker C.
    [J]. LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2016, 31 (02) : 415 - 430
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2020, Microsoft USBuildingFootprints
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2022, National Wildfire Coordinating Group Incident Response Pocket Guide
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2020, Existing Vegetation Type Layer
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2022, The Wildland Fire Interagency Geospatial Service Group-Current Wildland Fire Perimeters
  • [7] Fire Suppression Resource Scarcity: Current Metrics and Future Performance Indicators
    Belval, Erin J.
    Stonesifer, Crystal S.
    Calkin, David E.
    [J]. FORESTS, 2020, 11 (02):
  • [8] Variable ranking and selection with random forest for unbalanced data
    Bradter, Ute
    Altringham, John D.
    Kunin, William E.
    Thom, Tim J.
    O'Connell, Jerome
    Benton, Tim G.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA SCIENCE, 2022, 1
  • [9] Can we manage a future with more fire? Effectiveness of defensible space treatment depends on housing amount and configuration
    Braziunas, Kristin H.
    Seidl, Rupert
    Rammer, Werner
    Turner, Monica G.
    [J]. LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2021, 36 (02) : 309 - 330
  • [10] Random forests
    Breiman, L
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) : 5 - 32