Modifying dental composites to formulate novel methacrylate-based bone cements with improved polymerisation kinetics, and mechanical properties

被引:3
作者
Khan, Muhammad Adnan [1 ,2 ]
Delgado, Antonio H. S. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Young, Anne M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Khyber Med Univ, Inst Basic Med Sci, Dent Mat Dept, Peshawar, Pakistan
[2] UCL Eastman Dent Inst, Div Biomat & Tissue Engn, London, England
[3] Ctr Invest Interdisciplinar Egas Moniz CiiEM, Almada, Portugal
[4] UCL Med Sch, Royal Free Hosp, Biomat & Tissue Engn Dept, Rowland Hill St, Hampstead NW3 2PF, England
关键词
Bone cement; Bone substitute; Biomaterials; Dental composite; Polymerisation kinetics; Reaction kinetics; Mechanical properties; FLEXURAL STRENGTH; WATER SORPTION; IN-VITRO; RESIN; CONVERSION; SHRINKAGE; MODULUS; CYTOCOMPATIBILITY; ADHESIVE;
D O I
10.1016/j.dental.2023.10.010
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: The aim was to develop bone composites with similar working times, faster polymerisation and higher final conversion in comparison to CortossTM. Additionally, low shrinkage/heat generation and improved short and longer-term mechanical properties are desirable. Methods: Four urethane dimethacrylate based composites were prepared using tri-ethylene-glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) or polypropylene dimethacrylate (PPGDMA) diluent and 0 or 20 wt% fibres in the glass filler particles. FTIR was used to determine reaction kinetics, final degrees of conversions, and polymerisation shrinkage/ heat generation at 37 degrees C. Biaxial flexural strength, Young's modulus and compressive strength were evaluated after 1 or 30 days in water. Results: Experimental materials all had similar inhibition times to CortossTM (140 s) but subsequent maximum polymerisation rate was more than doubled. Average experimental composite final conversion (76%) was higher than that of CortossTM (58%) but with less heat generation and shrinkage. Replacement of TEGDMA by PPGDMA gave higher polymerisation rates and conversions while reducing shrinkage. Early and aged flexural strengths of CortossTM were 93 and 45 MPa respectively. Corresponding compressive strengths were 164 and 99 MPa. Early and lagged experimental composite flexural strengths were 164-186 and 240-274 MPa whilst compressive strengths were 240-274 MPa and 226-261 MPa. Young's modulus for CortossTM was 3.3 and 2.2 GPa at 1 day and 1 month. Experimental material values were 3.4-4.8 and 3.0-4.1 GPa, respectively. PPGDMA and fibres marginally reduced strength but caused greater reduction in modulus. Fibres also made the composites quasiductile instead of brittle. Significance: The improved setting and higher strengths of the experimental materials compared to CortossTM, could reduce monomer leakage from the injection site and material fracture, respectively. Lowering modulus may reduce stress shielding whilst quasi-ductile properties may improve fracture tolerance. The modified dental composites could therefore be a promising approach for future bone cements.
引用
收藏
页码:1067 / 1075
页数:9
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Adnan Muhammad K, 2015, Development of Antibacterial and Remineralising Composite Bone Cements - UCL Discovery
[2]   Polymerization shrinkage kinetics and shrinkage-stress in dental resin-composites [J].
Al Sunbul, Hanan ;
Silikas, Nick ;
Watts, David C. .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2016, 32 (08) :998-1006
[3]   Conversion, shrinkage, water sorption, flexural strength and modulus of re-mineralizing dental composites [J].
Aljabo, A. ;
Xia, W. ;
Liaqat, S. ;
Khan, M. A. ;
Knowles, J. C. ;
Ashley, P. ;
Young, A. M. .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2015, 31 (11) :1279-1289
[4]   A Guide through the Dental Dimethacrylate Polymer Network Structural Characterization and Interpretation of Physico-Mechanical Properties [J].
Barszczewska-Rybarek, Izabela Maria .
MATERIALS, 2019, 12 (24)
[5]   Femoroplasty - augmentation of the proximal femur with a composite bone cement - feasibility, biomechanical properties and osteosynthesis potential [J].
Beckmann, J. ;
Ferguson, S. J. ;
Gebauer, A. ;
Luering, C. ;
Gasser, B. ;
Heini, P. .
MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2007, 29 (07) :755-764
[6]   Variation of the mechanical properties of PMMA to suit osteoporotic cancellous bone [J].
Boger, Andreas ;
Bisig, Adrian ;
Bohner, Marc ;
Heini, Paul ;
Schneider, Erich .
JOURNAL OF BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE-POLYMER EDITION, 2008, 19 (09) :1125-1142
[7]   New surface-active comonomer for adhesive bonding [J].
Bowen, RL ;
Bennett, PS ;
Groh, RJ ;
Farahani, M ;
Eichmiller, FC .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1996, 75 (01) :606-610
[8]   Comparison of an experimental bone cement with surgical Simplex® P, Spineplex® and Cortoss® [J].
Boyd, D. ;
Towler, M. R. ;
Wren, A. ;
Clarkin, O. M. .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE-MATERIALS IN MEDICINE, 2008, 19 (04) :1745-1752
[9]   Complication of Polymethylmethacrylate Bone Cement in the Mandible [J].
Cakarer, Sirmahan ;
Selvi, Firat ;
Isler, S. Cemil ;
Olgac, Vakur ;
Keskin, Cengizhan .
JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2010, 21 (04) :1196-1198
[10]  
Cervantes-Uc J.M., 2015, Encyclopedia of Biomedical Polymers and Polymeric Biomaterials, P1053, DOI [10.1081/E-EBPP-120050598, DOI 10.1081/E-EBPP-120050598]