Mapping Decision Support Tools (DSTs) on agricultural water productivity: A global systematic scoping review

被引:2
作者
Mabhaudhi, Tafadzwanashe [1 ,2 ]
Dirwai, Tinashe Lindel [1 ,2 ]
Taguta, Cuthbert [2 ,3 ]
Sikka, Alok [4 ]
Lautze, Jonathan [1 ]
机构
[1] Int Water Management Inst IWMI SA, 333 Grosvenor St, ZA-0184 Pretoria, South Africa
[2] Univ KwaZulu Natal, Ctr Transformat Agr & Food Syst, Pietermaritzburg Campus, ZA-3201 Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
[3] Univ KwaZulu Natal, Sch Engn, Pietermaritzburg Campus, ZA-3201 Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
[4] Int Water Management Inst IWMI Delhi, NASC Complex,DPS Marg, New Delhi 110012, India
关键词
Algorithm; Debug; Integrated development environment; Management; Model; Spatial; Sustainability; SIMULATE YIELD RESPONSE; FAO CROP MODEL; IRRIGATION PERFORMANCE; USE EFFICIENCY; CLIMATE-CHANGE; WHEAT YIELD; PART; SOIL; MANAGEMENT; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108590
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
While there is a proliferation of Decision Support Tools (DSTs) to enhance agricultural water productivity (AWP) and related objectives such as food security, an assessment of their adoption and performance is not known to be undertaken. To develop new or improved DSTs for bespoke applications in optimizing AWP, there needs to be a stock-take of the existing tools, their functionality, user-friendliness and uptake. We compiled and assessed existing DSTs for AWP as a starting point for present and future developers who intend to improve existing or develop new DSTs for optimizing AWP. Secondarily, this review identifies DSTs' key characteristics, availability, and applicability for different typologies and spatio-temporal scales. The Preferred Reporting Items for Sys-tematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) approach was applied to search for literature from Scopus and WoS databases. The study revealed the existence of 81 documented AWP DSTs whose development started from around the 1970 s, peaked in the 1990 s, and declined after that although the improvement and upgrading of existing DSTs continued. Over half (51%) of the DSTs are not readily available in the public domain. The prevalent spatial and temporal application scales are field and day, respectively. There is limited reporting on the application at scale, partly due to the wide unavailability of DSTs. A gap exists in AWP DSTs with geospatial capabilities (one in 10 or 10% had geographic information systems (GIS) integration capabilities). Most DSTs focus on water and food (yield) components but omit energy and other dimensions of AWP. Regarding format, most tools were available as desktop (35%) and web-based (48%) applications, and codes (27%). Developers should strive to deliver AWP tools in convenient, compatible, and user-friendly for a wide range of users, from novices to experts.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Decision Support Model for Assessing the Water Regulation and Purification Potential of Agricultural Soils Across Europe
    Wall, David P.
    Delgado, Antonio
    O'Sullivan, Lilian
    Creamer, Rachel E.
    Trajanov, Aneta
    Kuzmanovski, Vladimir
    Bugge Henriksen, Christian
    Debeljak, Marko
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2020, 4
  • [22] Water-Energy-Food Nexus Tools in Theory and Practice: A Systematic Review
    Taguta, Cuthbert
    Senzanje, Aidan
    Kiala, Zolo
    Malota, Mphatso
    Mabhaudhi, Tafadzwanashe
    FRONTIERS IN WATER, 2022, 4
  • [23] Tools, frameworks and resources to guide global action on strengthening rural health systems: a mapping review
    Pamungkas, Dewi Retno
    O'Sullivan, Belinda
    McGrail, Matthew
    Chater, Bruce
    HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2023, 21 (01)
  • [24] Global mapping survey research on physiotherapeutic interventions for osteoarthritis: a scoping review protocol
    Monteiro, Nivea Renata Oliveira
    dos Anjos, Gabriely Cristina Sousa
    Pinto, Ana Carolina Pereira Nunes
    Matos, Areolino Pena
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (10):
  • [25] Shared Decision-Making Tools Implemented in the Electronic Health Record: Scoping Review
    Pierce, Joni H.
    Weir, Charlene
    Taft, Teresa
    Richards Ii, William
    Mcfarland, Mary M.
    Kawamoto, Kensaku
    Del Fiol, Guilherme
    Butler, Jorie M.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2025, 27
  • [26] A comparative review of decision support tools routinely used by selected transboundary River Basin Organisations
    Bukhari, H.
    Brown, C. A.
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF AQUATIC SCIENCE, 2022, 47 (03) : 318 - 337
  • [27] Clinical decision support for therapeutic decision-making in cancer: A systematic review
    Beauchemin, Melissa
    Murray, Meghan T.
    Sung, Lillian
    Hershman, Dawn L.
    Weng, Chunhua
    Schnall, Rebecca
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2019, 130
  • [28] Arctic geohazard mapping tools for civil infrastructure planning: A systematic review
    Wang, Ziyi
    Xiao, Ming
    Liew, Min
    Jensen, Anne
    Farquharson, Louise
    Romanovsky, Vladimir
    Nicolsky, Dmitry
    McComb, Christopher
    Jones, Benjamin M.
    Zhang, Xiong
    Alessa, Lilian
    COLD REGIONS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 214
  • [29] Evaluation of a new irrigation decision support system in improving cotton yield and water productivity in an arid climate
    Chen, Xiaoping
    Qi, Zhiming
    Gui, Dongwei
    Sima, Matthew W.
    Zeng, Fanjiang
    Li, Lanhai
    Li, Xiangyi
    Gu, Zhe
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2020, 234 (234)
  • [30] Machine Maintenance Decision Support System: A Systematic Literature Review
    Gandhi, Kanika
    Ng, Amos H. C.
    ADVANCES IN MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY XXXII, 2018, 8 : 349 - 354