Mapping Decision Support Tools (DSTs) on agricultural water productivity: A global systematic scoping review

被引:2
|
作者
Mabhaudhi, Tafadzwanashe [1 ,2 ]
Dirwai, Tinashe Lindel [1 ,2 ]
Taguta, Cuthbert [2 ,3 ]
Sikka, Alok [4 ]
Lautze, Jonathan [1 ]
机构
[1] Int Water Management Inst IWMI SA, 333 Grosvenor St, ZA-0184 Pretoria, South Africa
[2] Univ KwaZulu Natal, Ctr Transformat Agr & Food Syst, Pietermaritzburg Campus, ZA-3201 Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
[3] Univ KwaZulu Natal, Sch Engn, Pietermaritzburg Campus, ZA-3201 Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
[4] Int Water Management Inst IWMI Delhi, NASC Complex,DPS Marg, New Delhi 110012, India
关键词
Algorithm; Debug; Integrated development environment; Management; Model; Spatial; Sustainability; SIMULATE YIELD RESPONSE; FAO CROP MODEL; IRRIGATION PERFORMANCE; USE EFFICIENCY; CLIMATE-CHANGE; WHEAT YIELD; PART; SOIL; MANAGEMENT; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108590
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
While there is a proliferation of Decision Support Tools (DSTs) to enhance agricultural water productivity (AWP) and related objectives such as food security, an assessment of their adoption and performance is not known to be undertaken. To develop new or improved DSTs for bespoke applications in optimizing AWP, there needs to be a stock-take of the existing tools, their functionality, user-friendliness and uptake. We compiled and assessed existing DSTs for AWP as a starting point for present and future developers who intend to improve existing or develop new DSTs for optimizing AWP. Secondarily, this review identifies DSTs' key characteristics, availability, and applicability for different typologies and spatio-temporal scales. The Preferred Reporting Items for Sys-tematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) approach was applied to search for literature from Scopus and WoS databases. The study revealed the existence of 81 documented AWP DSTs whose development started from around the 1970 s, peaked in the 1990 s, and declined after that although the improvement and upgrading of existing DSTs continued. Over half (51%) of the DSTs are not readily available in the public domain. The prevalent spatial and temporal application scales are field and day, respectively. There is limited reporting on the application at scale, partly due to the wide unavailability of DSTs. A gap exists in AWP DSTs with geospatial capabilities (one in 10 or 10% had geographic information systems (GIS) integration capabilities). Most DSTs focus on water and food (yield) components but omit energy and other dimensions of AWP. Regarding format, most tools were available as desktop (35%) and web-based (48%) applications, and codes (27%). Developers should strive to deliver AWP tools in convenient, compatible, and user-friendly for a wide range of users, from novices to experts.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Application of the AquaCrop model in decision support for optimization of nitrogen fertilizer and water productivity of soybeans
    Adeboye, Omotayo B.
    Schultz, Bart
    Adeboye, Amaka P.
    Adekalu, Kenneth O.
    Osunbitan, Jimmy A.
    INFORMATION PROCESSING IN AGRICULTURE, 2021, 8 (03): : 419 - 436
  • [2] Optimising decision support tools for the agricultural sector
    Iakovidis, Dimitrios
    Gadanakis, Yiorgos
    Campos-Gonzalez, Jorge
    Park, Julian
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024,
  • [3] Review of Decision-Making Support Tools for Water Treatment Technologies in Developing Countries
    Glade, Sara
    Pagilla, Krishna
    JOURNAL AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION, 2015, 107 (05): : 64 - 76
  • [4] Enhancing Carbon Sequestration: A Systematic Literature Review of Spatial Decision Support Tools
    Tarasova, Ekaterina
    Valentini, Riccardo
    Di Lallo, Giulio
    Cotrina-Sanchez, Alexander
    Chiriaco, Maria Vincenza
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (12)
  • [5] Expanding access to veterinary clinical decision support in resource-limited settings: a scoping review of clinical decision support tools in medicine and antimicrobial stewardship
    Yusuf, Havan
    Hillman, Alison
    Stegeman, Jan Arend
    Cameron, Angus
    Badger, Skye
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2024, 11
  • [6] Decision Support Research in Warehousing and Distribution: A Systematic Literature Review
    Binos, Tania
    Adamopoulos, Arthur
    Bruno, Vince
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2020, 19 (03) : 653 - 693
  • [7] DECISION SUPPORT FOR AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT
    Panagopoulos, Y.
    Makropoulos, C.
    Mimikou, M.
    GLOBAL NEST JOURNAL, 2012, 14 (03): : 255 - 263
  • [8] Modeling tools for dengue risk mapping - a systematic review
    Louis, Valerie R.
    Phalkey, Revati
    Horstick, Olaf
    Ratanawong, Pitcha
    Wilder-Smith, Annelies
    Tozan, Yesim
    Dambach, Peter
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH GEOGRAPHICS, 2014, 13
  • [9] SPATIAL MAPPING OF AGRICULTURAL WATER PRODUCTIVITY USING THE SWAT MODEL IN UPPER BHIMA CATCHMENT, INDIA
    Garg, Kaushal K.
    Bharati, Luna
    Gaur, Anju
    George, Biju
    Acharya, Sreedhar
    Jella, Kiran
    Narasimhan, B.
    IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE, 2012, 61 (01) : 60 - 79
  • [10] Handheld Computer Devices to Support Clinical Decision-making in Acute Nursing Practice: Systematic Scoping Review
    Glanville, David
    Hutchinson, Anastasia
    Khaw, Damien
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2023, 25