Trace element geochemistry of magnetite from Mabianshan skarn iron deposit in the Lu-Zong volcanic basin, Eastern China

The composition of host rocks is essential in determining the composition of hydrothermal magnetite formed via fluid-rock interactions in skarn deposits. The HuangLong ore field in the Luzong volcanic basin, Eastern China, hosts several stratabound iron (Fe) skarn deposits, including Mabianshan and Longqiao. In this paper, we analyse the composition of different lithologies of carbonate strata and trace element concentrations in magnetite from Mabianshan, which has complex lithology carbonate strata, and compare it with magnetite from Longqiao, which has uniform lithology carbonate strata. The objective is to investigate the influence of lithology variation on magnetite trace elements and enhance the indicative significance of magnetite trace elements in prospecting and exploration. Our results demonstrate that the lithology of ore-bearing carbonate strata varies greatly due to inversion and different degrees of denudation in the ore field, resulting in variations of Al, Si, Mg, Mn, and Ca in the protolith across different areas. The alteration mineral assemblage of the Mabianshan deposit primarily included epidote, chlorite, and magnetite, while only a few diopside-magnetite relatively high-temperature assemblages developed in the southeastern part of the deposit. Moreover, higher concentrations of Ti and V in magnetite samples from the southeastern area of the deposit suggest that the heat sources related to Fe mineralization may be located there. Compared with the regular spatial variations of Mg, Mn, Al, and Si in the magnetite from Longqiao, the magnetite from Mabianshan does not show evident spatial variations due to the complex lithology of the magnetite protolith in different regions. The protolith lithology of magnetite from Longqiao is relatively stable, mainly dolomitic limestone. However, the protolith lithology of magnetite from Mabianshan is complex and includes dolomitic marlstone, dolomitic limestone, dolomite, and Fe-Mn bearing dolomite, resulting in a significant increase of Si, Al, Mg, and Mn in magnetite. Therefore, it is difficult to effectively trace the temporal-spatial evolution of the hydrothermal fluids using these elements in magnetite. Special attention should be paid to the uniformity of the protolith lithology of the ore when using these elements in magnetite to trace the fluid source.