The feasibility of climate action: Bridging the inside and the outside view through feasibility spaces

被引:39
作者
Jewell, Jessica [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cherp, Aleh [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Chalmers Univ Technol, Dept Space Earth & Environm, Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Univ Bergen, Ctr Climate & Energy Transformat, Bergen, Norway
[3] Int Inst Appl Syst Anal, Adv Syst Anal, Laxenburg, Austria
[4] Cent European Univ, Dept Environm Sci & Policy, Vienna, Austria
[5] Lund Univ, Int Inst Ind Environm Econ, Lund, Sweden
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
climate change mitigation; climate scenarios; feasibility; ENERGY TRANSITIONS; SOCIOTECHNICAL TRANSITIONS; SOLAR POWER; POLICY; POLITICS; DYNAMICS; SCENARIOS; SYSTEM; WIND; TECHNOLOGIES;
D O I
10.1002/wcc.838
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The feasibility of different options to reduce the risks of climate change has engaged scholars for decades. Yet there is no agreement on how to define and assess feasibility. We define feasible as "do-able under realistic assumptions." A sound feasibility assessment is based on causal reasoning; enables comparison of feasibility across climate options, contexts, and implementation levels; and reflexively considers the agency of its audience. Global climate scenarios are a good starting point for assessing the feasibility of climate options since they represent causal pathways, quantify implementation levels, and consider policy choices. Yet, scenario developers face difficulties to represent all relevant causalities, assess the realism of assumptions, assign likelihood to potential outcomes, and evaluate the agency of their users, which calls for external feasibility assessments. Existing approaches to feasibility assessment mirror the "inside" and the "outside" view coined by Kahneman and co-authors. The inside view considers climate change as a unique challenge and seeks to identify barriers that should be overcome by political choice, commitment, and skill. The outside view assesses feasibility through examining historical analogies (reference cases) to the given climate option. Recent studies seek to bridge the inside and the outside views through "feasibility spaces," by identifying reference cases for a climate option, measuring their outcomes and relevant characteristics, and mapping them together with the expected outcomes and characteristics of the climate option. Feasibility spaces are a promising method to prioritize climate options, realistically assess the achievability of climate goals, and construct scenarios with empirically-grounded assumptions.This article is categorized under:Climate, History, Society, Culture > Disciplinary PerspectivesAssessing Impacts of Climate Change > Representing UncertaintyThe Carbon Economy and Climate Mitigation > Decarbonizing Energy and/or Reducing Demand
引用
收藏
页数:31
相关论文
共 186 条
[31]   Energy and Economic Growth: The Stylized Facts [J].
Csereklyei, Zsuzsanna ;
Rubio-Varas, M. D. Mar ;
Stern, David I. .
ENERGY JOURNAL, 2016, 37 (02) :223-255
[32]  
de Coninck H., 2018, GLOBAL WARMING 15 C
[33]  
De Jouvenel Bertrand., 1967, The Art of Conjecture
[34]   Using modeling to generate alternatives (MGA) to expand our thinking on energy futures [J].
DeCarolis, Joseph F. .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2011, 33 (02) :145-152
[35]   Enriching the concept of solution space for climate adaptation by unfolding legal and governance dimensions [J].
Du, Haomiao ;
Triyanti, Annisa ;
Hegger, Dries L. T. ;
Gilissen, Herman Kasper ;
Driessen, Peter P. J. ;
van Rijswick, Helena F. M. W. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2022, 127 :253-262
[36]  
Dunning T., 2012, Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences: A Design-Based Approach, DOI [10.1017/CBO9781139084444, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139084444]
[37]   Cartography of pathways: A new model for environmental policy assessments [J].
Edenhofer, Ottmar ;
Kowarsch, Martin .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2015, 51 :56-64
[38]  
Edmonds J., 1984, ANAL POSSIBLE FUTURE
[39]   How modelers construct energy costs: Discursive elements in Energy System and Integrated Assessment Models [J].
Ellenbeck, Saskia ;
Lilliestam, Johan .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2019, 47 :69-77
[40]  
Engels A., 2023, Hamburg climate futures outlook 2023. The plausibility of a 1.5C limit to global warming-Social drivers and physical processes