The feasibility of climate action: Bridging the inside and the outside view through feasibility spaces

被引:39
作者
Jewell, Jessica [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cherp, Aleh [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Chalmers Univ Technol, Dept Space Earth & Environm, Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Univ Bergen, Ctr Climate & Energy Transformat, Bergen, Norway
[3] Int Inst Appl Syst Anal, Adv Syst Anal, Laxenburg, Austria
[4] Cent European Univ, Dept Environm Sci & Policy, Vienna, Austria
[5] Lund Univ, Int Inst Ind Environm Econ, Lund, Sweden
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
climate change mitigation; climate scenarios; feasibility; ENERGY TRANSITIONS; SOCIOTECHNICAL TRANSITIONS; SOLAR POWER; POLICY; POLITICS; DYNAMICS; SCENARIOS; SYSTEM; WIND; TECHNOLOGIES;
D O I
10.1002/wcc.838
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The feasibility of different options to reduce the risks of climate change has engaged scholars for decades. Yet there is no agreement on how to define and assess feasibility. We define feasible as "do-able under realistic assumptions." A sound feasibility assessment is based on causal reasoning; enables comparison of feasibility across climate options, contexts, and implementation levels; and reflexively considers the agency of its audience. Global climate scenarios are a good starting point for assessing the feasibility of climate options since they represent causal pathways, quantify implementation levels, and consider policy choices. Yet, scenario developers face difficulties to represent all relevant causalities, assess the realism of assumptions, assign likelihood to potential outcomes, and evaluate the agency of their users, which calls for external feasibility assessments. Existing approaches to feasibility assessment mirror the "inside" and the "outside" view coined by Kahneman and co-authors. The inside view considers climate change as a unique challenge and seeks to identify barriers that should be overcome by political choice, commitment, and skill. The outside view assesses feasibility through examining historical analogies (reference cases) to the given climate option. Recent studies seek to bridge the inside and the outside views through "feasibility spaces," by identifying reference cases for a climate option, measuring their outcomes and relevant characteristics, and mapping them together with the expected outcomes and characteristics of the climate option. Feasibility spaces are a promising method to prioritize climate options, realistically assess the achievability of climate goals, and construct scenarios with empirically-grounded assumptions.This article is categorized under:Climate, History, Society, Culture > Disciplinary PerspectivesAssessing Impacts of Climate Change > Representing UncertaintyThe Carbon Economy and Climate Mitigation > Decarbonizing Energy and/or Reducing Demand
引用
收藏
页数:31
相关论文
共 186 条
[1]  
AEMO, 2022, 2022 INT SYST PLAN I
[2]  
ANDERER J, 1981, ENERGY FINITE WORLD, V1
[3]  
Anderson K., 2019, NATURE, V573, P448
[4]   The trouble with negative emissions [J].
Anderson, Kevin ;
Peters, Glen .
SCIENCE, 2016, 354 (6309) :182-183
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2020, GLOBAL EV OUTLOOK 20
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1983, CHANGING CLIMATE REP, DOI DOI 10.17226/18714
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2022, IPCC, DOI [10.1017/9781009157926.021, DOI 10.1017/9781009157926.021]
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2022, CLIMATE CHANGE 2022, P2022, DOI [10.1017/9781009325844, DOI 10.1017/9781009325844]
[9]   Eighty-six EU policy options for reducing imported deforestation [J].
Bager, Simon L. ;
Persson, U. Martin ;
dos Reis, Tiago N. P. .
ONE EARTH, 2021, 4 (02) :289-306
[10]   Global Renewable Electricity Policy: A Comparative Policy Analysis of Countries by Income Status [J].
Baldwin, Elizabeth ;
Carley, Sanya ;
Brass, Jennifer N. ;
MacLean, Lauren M. .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE POLICY ANALYSIS, 2017, 19 (03) :277-298