Exploring Students' Critical Thinking Skills Using the Engineering Design Process in a Physics Classroom

被引:6
作者
Putra, Pramudya Dwi Aristya [1 ]
Sulaeman, Nurul Fitriyah [2 ]
Supeno [1 ]
Wahyuni, Sri [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jember, Fac Teacher Training & Educ, Dept Sci Educ, Jember, Indonesia
[2] Mulawarman Univ, Fac Teacher Training & Educ, Dept Phys Educ, Samarinda, Indonesia
关键词
Critical thinking skills; Engineering design process; Physics classroom;
D O I
10.1007/s40299-021-00640-3
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Critical thinking skills (CTS) have been applied in the learning environment to address students' challenges in the twenty-first century. Therefore, specific approaches need to be implemented in the learning environment to support students' CTS. This research explores students' CTS during the learning process through the engineering design process (EDP) in a physics classroom. The methodology relied on a case study where students were situated for the first time in an EDP classroom. Data were analyzed for each of the EDP stages based on CTS criteria codes. The accuracy of the data was tested through a peer review process to demonstrate the validity of the analysis. The results showed that students exhibited specific CTS criteria in each EDP stage. Therefore, EDP could be an alternative method to engage CTS. This result contributes empirical evidence that the research on CTS also needs the students' performance while engaged in EDP.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 149
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Critical thinking in the university curriculum - the impact on engineering education [J].
Ahern, A. ;
O'Connor, T. ;
McRuairc, G. ;
McNamara, M. ;
O'Donnell, D. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2012, 37 (02) :125-132
[2]   Critical thinking in reflective sessions and in online interactions [J].
Alba Celani, Maria Antonieta ;
Collins, Heloisa .
AILA REVIEW, 2005, 18 (01) :41-57
[3]   Implementation of Engineering Design Process in the K-12 Science Classrooms: Trends and Issues [J].
Arik, Merve ;
Topcu, Mustafa Sami .
RESEARCH IN SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2022, 52 (01) :21-43
[4]  
Creswell J., 2016, Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches, DOI DOI 10.1089/TMJ.2009.0067
[5]  
Dewey John., 1993, How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process
[6]  
Ennis R.H., 1993, Theory into Practice, V32, P179, DOI DOI 10.1080/00405849309543594
[7]  
Ennis R.H., 1989, EDUC RESEARCHER, V18, P4, DOI DOI 10.3102/0013189X018003004
[8]  
Ernest J., 2004, Environmental Education Research, V10, P507, DOI DOI 10.1080/1350462042000291038
[9]  
Facione P. A., 1990, CRITICAL THINKING ST, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.TSC.2009.07.002
[10]  
Farmer JL., 2018, P CANADIAN ENG ED AS, DOI 10.24908/pceea.v0i0.13057