Diagnostic values of ten methods in patients with onychomycosis: A network meta-analysis

被引:1
作者
Zhao, Yan [1 ]
Wang, Xinwei [1 ]
Lu, Changyu [2 ]
机构
[1] First Peoples Hosp Jingzhou, Dept Dermatol, 8 Hangkong Rd, Jingzhou, Hubei Province, Peoples R China
[2] First Peoples Hosp Jingzhou, Dept Econ Management, Jingzhou, Hubei Province, Peoples R China
关键词
finger nails; laboratory diagnostics; network meta-analysis; onychomycosis; tinea unguium; POTASSIUM HYDROXIDE MOUNT; NAIL CLIPPINGS; DERMATOMYCOSES; CULTURE; STAIN; PCR;
D O I
10.1111/myc.13696
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
BackgroundOnychomycosis, a disease was with a high global prevalence, has been the focal point of this study. The research aims to compare diagnostic efficacy among various methods, including potassium hydroxide (KOH), Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), specific colour staining (Chlorazol, lactophenol cotton blue and Chicago sky blue stain), fluorescent staining (calcofluor white stain, acridine orange fluorescent dye), culture on dermatophyte test medium (DTM), conventional PCR, dermoscopy, histopathological examination using PAS stain (HEP-PAS), real-time PCR and multiple PCR. This comparison was achieved through a network meta-analysis involving patients with onychomycosis.MethodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted across eight databases. Subsequently, both direct and indirect evidence were amalgamated to assess sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy. This combination analysis helped to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) and surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values of the nine different methods, providing an in-depth perspective on diagnosing onychomycosis.ResultsThe network meta-analysis integrated 20 eligible diagnostic trials. The results exhibited that DTM provided higher sensitivity, NPV and accuracy, as indicated by SUCRA values. Meanwhile, DMSO demonstrated higher specificity and positive predictive value in terms of SUCRA values. Among the nine methods, fluorescent staining showcased comparatively superior sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV and accuracy. Furthermore, a cluster analysis indicated that DTM held the highest diagnostic value for sensitivity and accuracy among the nine techniques, with fluorescence staining ranking second.ConclusionThis network meta-analysis strengthens the evidence suggesting that fluorescence staining exhibits strong diagnostic value in onychomycosis. This finding bears diagnostic implications for onychomycosis.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Dermatomycosis: comparison of the performance of calcofluor and potassium hydroxide 30% for the direct examination of skin scrapings and nails
    Abdelrahman, T.
    Bru, V. Letscher
    Waller, J.
    Noacco, G.
    Candolfi, E.
    [J]. JOURNAL DE MYCOLOGIE MEDICALE, 2006, 16 (02): : 87 - 91
  • [2] Diagnosis of pulmonary aspergillosis using optical brighteners
    Andreas, S
    Heindl, S
    Wattky, C
    Möller, K
    Rüchel, R
    [J]. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2000, 15 (02) : 407 - 411
  • [3] A Retrospective Review of Diagnostic Testing for Onychomycosis of the Foot
    Blake, Nell
    Zhu, Junjia
    Hernandez, Giselle
    Juliano, Paul Joseph
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PODIATRIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 105 (06) : 503 - 508
  • [4] Bodman MA., 2022, Onychomycosis
  • [5] Onychomycosis: An analysis of 50 cases and a comparison of diagnostic techniques
    Borkowski, P
    Williams, M
    Holewinski, J
    Bakotic, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PODIATRIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 91 (07) : 351 - 355
  • [6] CaiLing Z., 2020, Chin J Dermatol Venereol, V34, P842, DOI [10.13735/j.cjdv.1001-7089.201909078, DOI 10.13735/J.CJDV.1001-7089.201909078]
  • [7] Ceren E, 2008, Turkderm-Turk Arch D, V42, P91
  • [8] Dass SM., 2015, J Microbiol, V2, P148, DOI [10.5958/2394-5478.2015.00004.7, DOI 10.5958/2394-5478.2015.00004.7]
  • [9] Dewen H., 2016, Chin J Mycol, V11, P240
  • [10] Usefulness of histological examination for the diagnosis of onychomycosis
    Gianni, C
    Morelli, V
    Cerri, A
    Greco, C
    Rossini, P
    Guiducci, A
    Braidotti, P
    Calcaterra, R
    Papini, M
    [J]. DERMATOLOGY, 2001, 202 (04) : 283 - 288