OLIVA: The Indexed Scientific Output in Latin America. Disciplinary Diversity, Institutional Collaboration, and Multilingualism in SciELO and Redalyc (1995-2018)

被引:6
作者
Beigel, Fernanda [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Packer, Abel L. [4 ]
Gallardo, Osvaldo [3 ,5 ,6 ]
Salatino, Maximiliano [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] INCIHUSA CONICET, Mendoza, Argentina
[2] Univ Nacl Cuyo, Sociol, Mendoza, Argentina
[3] Ctr Estudios Circulac Conocimiento FCPyS UNCuyo, Mendoza, Argentina
[4] Programa SciELO FAPESP, Sci Elect Lib Online, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[5] IMESC CONICET, Mendoza, Argentina
[6] Univ Nacl Cuyo, Carrera Comunicac Social, Mendoza, Argentina
来源
DADOS-REVISTA DE CIENCIAS SOCIAIS | 2024年 / 67卷 / 01期
关键词
indexed journals; SciELO; Redalyc; national collaboration; international collaboration; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1590/dados.2024.67.1.307
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This article presents the results of the Latin American Observatory of eVAluation Indicators (OLIVA, its Spanish acronym) which aims to contribute to the visibility of indexed scientific output in Latin America and the Caribbean and enhance its value in evaluation systems. This study addresses the production published in open access by journals indexed in SciELO and Redalyc, based on a single database of a total of 1,720 journals (from 15 countries), 908,982 documents and 2,591,704 authors. It also high-lights its disciplinary diversity, and trends in national and international research col-laboration. Finally, only for the case of Brazil and SciELO, intranational collaboration is analyzed. The study concludes that there is a predominance of diamond journals, of university publishing institutions and of multiscalar forms of circulation. These characteristics, even with linguistic and disciplinary diversity, can contribute very effectively to the current needs of science communication in times of open science.
引用
收藏
页数:42
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2014, Indicadores de cceso abierto y comunicaciones academicas en America
  • [2] The adoption of Article Processing Charges as a business model by Brazilian Open Access journals
    Appel, Andre Luiz
    Albagli, Sarita
    [J]. TRANSINFORMACAO, 2019, 31
  • [3] Basso I, 2021, PRO INT CONF SCI INF, P93
  • [4] Publishing from the periphery: Structural heterogeneity and segmented circuits. The evaluation of scientific publications for tenure in Argentina's CONICET
    Beigel, Fernanda
    [J]. CURRENT SOCIOLOGY, 2014, 62 (05) : 743 - 765
  • [5] BEIGEL Fernanda, 2019, CIENCIA TECNOLOGIA P, V2, P028, DOI [10.24215/26183188-028, DOI 10.24215/26183188-028]
  • [6] Bosman J., 2021, Zenodo, DOI [10.5281/zenodo.4558704, DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.4558704]
  • [7] Chittó-Stumpf Ida Regina, 2017, Rev. Interam. Bibliot, V40, P45, DOI 10.17533/udea.rib.v40n1a05
  • [8] Cordoba Gonzalez Saray, 2021, CONOCIMIENTO ABIERTO, P175
  • [9] LOST SCIENCE IN THE 3RD-WORLD
    GIBBS, WW
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 1995, 273 (02) : 92 - 99
  • [10] Gingras Y, 2016, Bibliometrics and research evaluation: uses and abuses (history and foundations of information science)