Development and psychometric properties of a short version of the Patient Continuity of Care Questionnaire

被引:2
作者
Safstrom, Emma [1 ,2 ,3 ,10 ]
Arestedt, Kristofer [4 ,5 ]
Hadjistavropoulos, Heather D. [6 ]
Liljeroos, Maria [2 ,3 ]
Nordgren, Lena [3 ,7 ]
Jaarsma, Tiny [2 ,8 ]
Stromberg, Anna [2 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Nykoping Hosp, Sormland Cty Council, Nykoping, Sweden
[2] Linkoping Univ, Dept Hlth Med & Caring Sci, Linkoping, Sweden
[3] Uppsala Univ, Ctr Clin Res Sormland, Eskilstuna, Sweden
[4] Linnaeus Univ, Fac Hlth & Life Sci, Dept Hlth & Caring Sci, Kalmar, Sweden
[5] Reg Kalmar Cty, Dept Res, Kalmar, Sweden
[6] Univ Regina, Dept Psychol, Regina, SK, Canada
[7] Uppsala Univ, Dept Publ Hlth & Caring Sci, Uppsala, Sweden
[8] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Julius Ctr, Dept Nursing Sci, Utrecht, Netherlands
[9] Linkoping Univ, Dept Cardiol, Linkoping, Sweden
[10] Linkoping Univ, Dept Hlth Med & Caring Sci, SE-58183 Linkoping, Sweden
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
continuity of care; patient discharge; psychometrics; quality of care; reproducibility of results; surveys and questionnaires; validation studies; HEART-FAILURE; VALIDITY; SATISFACTION; RELIABILITY; OUTCOMES; SCALE;
D O I
10.1111/hex.13728
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
IntroductionHospitalization due to cardiac conditions is increasing worldwide, and follow-up after hospitalization usually occurs in a different healthcare setting than the one providing treatment during hospitalization. This leads to a risk of fragmented care and increases the need for coordination and continuity of care after hospitalization. Furthermore, international reports highlight the importance of improving continuity of care and state that it is an essential indicator of the quality of care. Patients' perceptions of continuity of care can be evaluated using the Patient Continuity of Care Questionnaire (PCCQ). However, the original version is extensive and may prove burdensome to complete; therefore, we aimed to develop and evaluate a short version of the PCCQ. MethodsThis was a psychometric validation study. Content validity was evaluated among user groups, including patients (n = 7), healthcare personnel (n = 15), and researchers (n = 7). Based on the results of the content validity and conceptual discussions among the authors, 12 items were included in the short version. Data from patients were collected using a consecutive sampling procedure involving patients 6 weeks after hospitalization due to cardiac conditions. Rasch analysis was used to evaluate the psychometric properties of the short version of the PCCQ. ResultsA total of 1000 patients were included [mean age 72 (SD = 10), 66% males]. The PCCQ-12 presented a satisfactory overall model fit and a person separation index of 0.79 (Cronbach's alpha: .91, ordinal alpha: .94). However, three items presented individual item misfits. No evidence of multidimensionality was found, meaning that a total score can be calculated. A total of four items presented evidence of response dependence but, according to the analysis, this did not seem to affect the measurement properties or reliability of the PCCQ-12. We found that the first two response options were disordered in all items. However, the reliability remained the same when these response options were amended. In future research, the benefits of the four response options could be evaluated. ConclusionThe PCCQ-12 has sound psychometric properties and is ready to be used in clinical and research settings to measure patients' perceptions of continuity of care after hospitalization. Patient or Public ContributionPatients, healthcare personnel and researchers were involved in the study because they were invited to select items relevant to the short version of the questionnaire.
引用
收藏
页码:1137 / 1148
页数:12
相关论文
共 63 条
  • [1] The relationship between continuity and patient satisfaction: a systematic review
    Adler, Rhodes
    Vasiliadis, Athanasia
    Bickell, Nina
    [J]. FAMILY PRACTICE, 2010, 27 (02) : 171 - 178
  • [2] Altman D., 1990, PRACTICAL STAT MED R
  • [3] RATING FORMULATION FOR ORDERED RESPONSE CATEGORIES
    ANDRICH, D
    [J]. PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1978, 43 (04) : 561 - 573
  • [4] Andrich D, 2019, COURSE RASCH MEASURE, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-981-13-7496-8
  • [5] Andrich D., 2013, Interpreting RUMM2030
  • [6] Andrich D., 2019, MEASURING ED SOCIAL
  • [7] Andrich D., 1988, RASCH MODELS MEASURE
  • [8] Real and Artificial Differential Item Functioning
    Andrich, David
    Hagquist, Curt
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICS, 2012, 37 (03) : 387 - 416
  • [9] Andrich D, 2010, HANDBOOK OF POLYTOMOUS ITEM RESPONSE THEORY MODELS, P123
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2005, RUMM2020 RASCH UNIDI