Neural stochastic differential equations network as uncertainty quantification method for EEG source localization

被引:1
作者
Wabina, R. S. [1 ]
Silpasuwanchai, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Asian Inst Technol AIT, Ctr Hlth & Wellness Technol, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani, Thailand
关键词
EEG source localization; uncertainty quantification; SDE-Net; deep bayesian methods; HEAD TISSUE CONDUCTIVITY; MODEL; GRADIENT; BRAIN;
D O I
10.1088/2057-1976/aca20b
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
EEG source localization remains a challenging problem given the uncertain conductivity values of the volume conductor models (VCMs). As uncertain conductivities vary across people, they may considerably impact the forward and inverse solutions of the EEG, leading to an increase in localization mistakes and misdiagnoses of brain disorders. Calibration of conductivity values using uncertainty quantification (UQ) techniques is a promising approach to reduce localization errors. The widely-known UQ methods involve Bayesian approaches, which utilize prior conductivity values to derive their posterior inference and estimate their optimal calibration. However, these approaches have two significant drawbacks: solving for posterior inference is intractable, and choosing inappropriate priors may lead to increased localization mistakes. This study used the Neural Stochastic Differential equations Network (SDE-Net), a combination of dynamical systems and deep learning techniques that utilizes the Wiener process to minimize conductivity uncertainties in the VCM and improve the inverse problem. Results revealed that SDE-Net generated a lower localization error rate in the inverse problem compared to Bayesian techniques. Future studies may employ new stochastic dynamical systems-based techniques as a UQ technique to address further uncertainties in the EEG Source Localization problem. Our code can be found here: https://github.com/rrwabina/SDENet-UQ-ESL.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 74 条
  • [1] A review of uncertainty quantification in deep learning: Techniques, applications and challenges
    Abdar, Moloud
    Pourpanah, Farhad
    Hussain, Sadiq
    Rezazadegan, Dana
    Liu, Li
    Ghavamzadeh, Mohammad
    Fieguth, Paul
    Cao, Xiaochun
    Khosravi, Abbas
    Acharya, U. Rajendra
    Makarenkov, Vladimir
    Nahavandi, Saeid
    [J]. INFORMATION FUSION, 2021, 76 : 243 - 297
  • [2] Simultaneous head tissue conductivity and EEG source location estimation
    Acar, Zeynep Akalin
    Acar, Can E.
    Makeig, Scott
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2016, 124 : 168 - 180
  • [3] Effects of Forward Model Errors on EEG Source Localization
    Acar, Zeynep Akalin
    Makeig, Scott
    [J]. BRAIN TOPOGRAPHY, 2013, 26 (03) : 378 - 396
  • [4] Illustrative Discussion of MC-Dropout in General Dataset: Uncertainty Estimation in Bitcoin
    Alarab, Ismail
    Prakoonwit, Simant
    Nacer, Mohamed Ikbal
    [J]. NEURAL PROCESSING LETTERS, 2021, 53 (02) : 1001 - 1011
  • [5] Effects of uncertainty in head tissue conductivity and complexity on EEG forward modeling in neonates
    Azizollahi, Hamed
    Aarabi, Ardalan
    Wallois, Fabrice
    [J]. HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2016, 37 (10) : 3604 - 3622
  • [6] Nengo: a Python']Python tool for building large-scale functional brain models
    Bekolay, Trevor
    Bergstra, James
    Hunsberger, Eric
    DeWolf, Travis
    Stewart, Terrence C.
    Rasmussen, Daniel
    Choo, Xuan
    Voelker, Aaron Russell
    Eliasmith, Chris
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN NEUROINFORMATICS, 2014, 7
  • [7] Bayesian Active Learning for Optimization and Uncertainty Quantification in Protein Docking
    Cao, Yue
    Shen, Yang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION, 2020, 16 (08) : 5334 - 5347
  • [8] Chen GH, 2006, INT CONF ACOUST SPEE, P2181
  • [9] Chen T.Q., 2018, P 32 INT C NEURAL IN, V31, P6572
  • [10] Influence of the head model on EEG and MEG source connectivity analyses
    Cho, Jae-Hyun
    Vorwerk, Johannes
    Wolters, Carsten H.
    Knoesche, Thomas R.
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2015, 110 : 60 - 77