Selection of Greywater Reuse Options Using Multi-criteria Decision-making Techniques

被引:9
作者
Daniel, Melvin [1 ]
Ahammed, M. Mansoor [1 ]
Shaikh, Irshad N. N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sardar Vallabhbhai Natl Inst Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Surat 395007, India
关键词
ELECTRE; Greywater reuse; MCDM; PROMETHEE; TOPSIS; VIKOR; WATER; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1007/s41101-023-00181-4
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
On-site reuse of treated greywater for non-potable purposes such as toilet flushing, garden irrigation and car washing is one of the alternatives to meet the increasing water demand and to reduce the load on sewage treatment plants. However, no studies have been reported on selecting the most appropriate reuse option among the different reuse options available. In the present study, multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods TOPSIS, VIKOR, ELECTRE and PROMETHEE were used to rank the greywater reuse alternatives. The main criteria considered included acceptability, adaptability and the risk involved with the reuse option along with technical and economic considerations. Alternative uses considered in the study were household reuse, public reuse, industrial reuse, groundwater recharge and agricultural reuse. Based on expert opinion, the weightage of criteria and relative importance of each alternative to criteria were determined using the defuzzification method. Kendall's coefficients of concordance and Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were used to compare the ranks, while sensitivity analysis was performed to find the least impacted results. Results show that domestic reuse is the best alternative for greywater reuse, followed by public reuse. Kendall's concordance value suggests more than partial agreement between the ranks obtained by different MCDM techniques. Sensitivity analysis showed that technical consideration was the most sensitive criterion.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Grey water biodegradability [J].
Abu Ghunmi, Lina ;
Zeeman, Grietje ;
Fayyad, Manar ;
van Lier, Jules B. .
BIODEGRADATION, 2011, 22 (01) :163-174
[2]   Understanding the preferences for different types of urban greywater uses and the impact of qualitative attributes [J].
Amaris, Gloria ;
Dawson, Richard ;
Gironas, Jorge ;
Hess, Stephane ;
Ortuzar, Juan de Dios .
WATER RESEARCH, 2020, 184
[3]  
Arifin S N.H., 2021, Materials Today: Proceedings, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.MATPR.2021.01.038, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.038]
[4]   Optimal wastewater allocation with the development of an SECA multi-criteria decision-making method [J].
Azbari, Kosar Ebrahimzadeh ;
Ashofteh, Parisa-Sadat ;
Golfam, Parvin ;
Singh, Vijay P. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 321
[5]  
Birgun Semra, 2010, Proceedings 2010 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Knowledge Engineering (ISKE 2010), P634, DOI 10.1109/ISKE.2010.5680767
[6]   A comparative study of preference dominance-based approaches for selection of industrial robots [J].
Chatterjee, P. ;
Mondal, S. ;
Chakraborty, S. .
ADVANCES IN PRODUCTION ENGINEERING & MANAGEMENT, 2014, 9 (01) :5-20
[7]  
Chatterjee P., 2014, International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, V5, P315, DOI [DOI 10.5267/J.IJIEC.2013.10.002, DOI 10.5267/j.ijiec.2013.10.002]
[8]   Municipal solid waste management via multi-criteria decision making methods: A case study in Istanbul, Turkey [J].
Coban, Asli ;
Ertis, Irem Firtina ;
Cavdaroglu, Nur Ayvaz .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 180 :159-167
[9]   Selecting a Sustainable Disinfection Technique for Wastewater Reuse Projects [J].
Curiel-Esparza, Jorge ;
Cuenca-Ruiz, Marco A. ;
Martin-Utrillas, Manuel ;
Canto-Perello, Julian .
WATER, 2014, 6 (09) :2732-2747
[10]  
Dursun M, 2016, ENG LET, V24, P231