Patient and Caregiver Reciprocal Support: Impact on Decision Making in Specialist Palliative Care

被引:3
作者
McCauley, Rachel [1 ,5 ,6 ]
Ryan, Karen [2 ,3 ,4 ]
McQuillan, Regina [2 ]
Foley, Geraldine [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Trinity Coll Dublin, Sch Med, Discipline Occupat Therapy, Dublin, Ireland
[2] St Francis Hosp, Dublin, Ireland
[3] Mater Misericordiae Univ Hosp, Dublin, Ireland
[4] Univ Coll Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
[5] Beaumont Hosp, Dublin, Ireland
[6] Royal Coll Surgeons Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
[7] Trinity Coll Dublin, Trinity Ctr Hlth Sci, Sch Med, Discipline Occupat Therapy, Jamess St, Dublin 8, Ireland
关键词
Decision making; support; reciprocity; patient; caregivers; qualitative; grounded theory; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; LIFE; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.08.002
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Context. Patients and informal caregivers in palliative care can reciprocate in supporting one another. However, how reciprocal support among patients and informal caregivers in palliative care impacts on their decision making for care is not well understood. Objectives. To identify how reciprocal support among patients with advanced illness and their informal caregivers in specialist palliative care impacts on their decision making for care.Methods. Between July 2021 and May 2022, 30 qualitative interviews were conducted with 14 patient and caregiver dyads, seven nondyad caregiver participants and one nondyad patient participant (total n = 36), recruited from a large regional specialist palliative care service. Data were analyzed using Corbin and Strauss grounded theory method.Results. Reciprocal support among patients and informal caregivers was underpinned by obligation and choice. Caregivers who felt obliged to care had difficulty communicating with the patient about the patient's preferences for care and their own wishes for patient care. Patients who felt obliged to accept support from their caregiver tended to minimize caregiver participation in decision making which made caregivers feel disempowered in discussions about patient care. Caregivers tended to be more involved in decision making when caregivers assumed caregiving duties by choice and when the patient did not feel restricted by their reliance on their caregiver. Open communication between patients and caregivers made patients more trusting of their caregiver.Conclusion. Patient and caregiver dyadic interventions in specialist palliative care involving decision making need to account for how obligation and choice manifest and function between the patient and caregiver. J Pain Symptom Manage 2023;66:570 -577.(c) 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
引用
收藏
页码:570 / 577
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [21] Living with multiple myeloma: experiences of patients and their informal caregivers
    Molassiotis, Alex
    Wilson, Barbara
    Blair, Susan
    Howe, Tracy
    Cavet, James
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2011, 19 (01) : 101 - 111
  • [22] Is Member Checking the Gold Standard of Quality in Qualitative Research?
    Motulsky, Sue L.
    [J]. QUALITATIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 8 (03) : 389 - 406
  • [23] Next-of-kin caregivers in palliative home care - from control to loss of control
    Munck, Berit
    Fridlund, Bengt
    Martensson, Jan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2008, 64 (06) : 578 - 586
  • [24] Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research: A Synthesis of Recommendations
    O'Brien, Bridget C.
    Harris, Ilene B.
    Beckman, Thomas J.
    Reed, Darcy A.
    Cook, David A.
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2014, 89 (09) : 1245 - 1251
  • [25] Place of care: from referral to specialist palliative care until death
    O'Leary, Mary Jane
    O'Brien, Alison C.
    Murphy, Marie
    Crowley, Claire M.
    Leahy, Helen M.
    McCarthy, Jill M.
    Collins, Joan C.
    O'Brien, Tony
    [J]. BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2017, 7 (01) : 53 - 59
  • [26] Generalist versus Specialist Palliative Medicine
    Periyakoil, Vyjeyanthi S.
    von Gunten, Charles F.
    Fischer, Stacy
    Pantilat, Steve
    Quill, Timothy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 25 (02) : 193 - 199
  • [27] Informal Caregiving of Hospice Patients
    Pottie, Colin G.
    Burch, Karen A.
    Thomas, Lori P. Montross
    Irwin, Scott A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2014, 17 (07) : 845 - 856
  • [28] Patient Perspectives of Dignity, Autonomy and Control at the End of Life: Systematic Review and Meta-Ethnography
    Rodriguez-Prat, Andrea
    Monforte-Royo, Cristina
    Porta-Sales, Josep
    Escribano, Xavier
    Balaguer, Albert
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (03):
  • [29] An exploration of family carers' experience of respite services in one specialist palliative care unit
    Skilbeck, JK
    Payne, SA
    Ingleton, MC
    Nolan, M
    Carey, I
    Hanson, A
    [J]. PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2005, 19 (08) : 610 - 618
  • [30] Decision-making in palliative care: patient and family caregiver concordance and discordance-systematic review and narrative synthesis
    Symmons, Sophie Mulcahy
    Ryan, Karen
    Aoun, Samar M.
    Selman, Lucy E.
    Davies, Andrew Neil
    Cornally, Nicola
    Lombard, John
    McQuilllan, Regina
    Guerin, Suzanne
    O'Leary, Norma
    Connolly, Michael
    Rabbitte, Mary
    Mockler, David
    Foley, Geraldine
    [J]. BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2023, 13 (04) : 374 - 385