Patient and Caregiver Reciprocal Support: Impact on Decision Making in Specialist Palliative Care

被引:3
作者
McCauley, Rachel [1 ,5 ,6 ]
Ryan, Karen [2 ,3 ,4 ]
McQuillan, Regina [2 ]
Foley, Geraldine [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Trinity Coll Dublin, Sch Med, Discipline Occupat Therapy, Dublin, Ireland
[2] St Francis Hosp, Dublin, Ireland
[3] Mater Misericordiae Univ Hosp, Dublin, Ireland
[4] Univ Coll Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
[5] Beaumont Hosp, Dublin, Ireland
[6] Royal Coll Surgeons Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
[7] Trinity Coll Dublin, Trinity Ctr Hlth Sci, Sch Med, Discipline Occupat Therapy, Jamess St, Dublin 8, Ireland
关键词
Decision making; support; reciprocity; patient; caregivers; qualitative; grounded theory; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; LIFE; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.08.002
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Context. Patients and informal caregivers in palliative care can reciprocate in supporting one another. However, how reciprocal support among patients and informal caregivers in palliative care impacts on their decision making for care is not well understood. Objectives. To identify how reciprocal support among patients with advanced illness and their informal caregivers in specialist palliative care impacts on their decision making for care.Methods. Between July 2021 and May 2022, 30 qualitative interviews were conducted with 14 patient and caregiver dyads, seven nondyad caregiver participants and one nondyad patient participant (total n = 36), recruited from a large regional specialist palliative care service. Data were analyzed using Corbin and Strauss grounded theory method.Results. Reciprocal support among patients and informal caregivers was underpinned by obligation and choice. Caregivers who felt obliged to care had difficulty communicating with the patient about the patient's preferences for care and their own wishes for patient care. Patients who felt obliged to accept support from their caregiver tended to minimize caregiver participation in decision making which made caregivers feel disempowered in discussions about patient care. Caregivers tended to be more involved in decision making when caregivers assumed caregiving duties by choice and when the patient did not feel restricted by their reliance on their caregiver. Open communication between patients and caregivers made patients more trusting of their caregiver.Conclusion. Patient and caregiver dyadic interventions in specialist palliative care involving decision making need to account for how obligation and choice manifest and function between the patient and caregiver. J Pain Symptom Manage 2023;66:570 -577.(c) 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
引用
收藏
页码:570 / 577
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [11] Decision-making among patients and their family in ALS care: a review
    Foley, Geraldine
    Hynes, Geralyn
    [J]. AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS AND FRONTOTEMPORAL DEGENERATION, 2018, 19 (3-4) : 173 - 193
  • [12] Using Grounded Theory Method to Capture and Analyze Health Care Experiences
    Foley, Geraldine
    Timonen, Virpi
    [J]. HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2015, 50 (04) : 1195 - 1210
  • [13] Green J., 2018, QUALITATIVE METHODS
  • [14] Experiences of transitioning between settings of care from the perspectives of patients with advanced illness receiving specialist palliative care and their family caregivers: A qualitative interview study
    Guo, Ping
    Pinto, Cathryn
    Edwards, Beth
    Pask, Sophie
    Firth, Alice
    O'Brien, Suzanne
    Murtagh, Fliss E. M.
    [J]. PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 36 (01) : 124 - 134
  • [15] The role of relatives in decisions concerning life-prolonging treatment in patients with end-stage malignant disorders: informants, advocates or surrogate decision-makers?
    Hauke, D.
    Reiter-Theil, S.
    Hoster, E.
    Hiddemann, W.
    Winkler, E. C.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2011, 22 (12) : 2667 - 2674
  • [16] Referral criteria for outpatient specialty palliative cancer care: an international consensus
    Hui, David
    Mori, Masanori
    Watanabe, Sharon M.
    Caraceni, Augusto
    Strasser, Florian
    Saarto, Tiina
    Cherny, Nathan
    Glare, Paul
    Kaasa, Stein
    Bruera, Eduardo
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2016, 17 (12) : E552 - E559
  • [17] Patient participation in shared decision-making in palliative care - an integrative review
    Kuosmanen, Lotta
    Hupli, Maija
    Ahtiluoto, Satu
    Haavisto, Elina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2021, 30 (23-24) : 3415 - 3428
  • [18] Qualitative research - Critically appraising qualitative research
    Kuper, Ayelet
    Lingard, Lorelei
    Levinson, Wendy
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 337 (7671):
  • [19] Lolich L, 2017, SOUNDINGS, V100, P353
  • [20] Mutual support between patients and family caregivers in palliative care: A systematic review and narrative synthesis
    McCauley, Rachel
    McQuillan, Regina
    Ryan, Karen
    Foley, Geraldine
    [J]. PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 35 (05) : 875 - 885