Patient and Caregiver Reciprocal Support: Impact on Decision Making in Specialist Palliative Care

被引:3
作者
McCauley, Rachel [1 ,5 ,6 ]
Ryan, Karen [2 ,3 ,4 ]
McQuillan, Regina [2 ]
Foley, Geraldine [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Trinity Coll Dublin, Sch Med, Discipline Occupat Therapy, Dublin, Ireland
[2] St Francis Hosp, Dublin, Ireland
[3] Mater Misericordiae Univ Hosp, Dublin, Ireland
[4] Univ Coll Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
[5] Beaumont Hosp, Dublin, Ireland
[6] Royal Coll Surgeons Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
[7] Trinity Coll Dublin, Trinity Ctr Hlth Sci, Sch Med, Discipline Occupat Therapy, Jamess St, Dublin 8, Ireland
关键词
Decision making; support; reciprocity; patient; caregivers; qualitative; grounded theory; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; LIFE; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.08.002
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Context. Patients and informal caregivers in palliative care can reciprocate in supporting one another. However, how reciprocal support among patients and informal caregivers in palliative care impacts on their decision making for care is not well understood. Objectives. To identify how reciprocal support among patients with advanced illness and their informal caregivers in specialist palliative care impacts on their decision making for care.Methods. Between July 2021 and May 2022, 30 qualitative interviews were conducted with 14 patient and caregiver dyads, seven nondyad caregiver participants and one nondyad patient participant (total n = 36), recruited from a large regional specialist palliative care service. Data were analyzed using Corbin and Strauss grounded theory method.Results. Reciprocal support among patients and informal caregivers was underpinned by obligation and choice. Caregivers who felt obliged to care had difficulty communicating with the patient about the patient's preferences for care and their own wishes for patient care. Patients who felt obliged to accept support from their caregiver tended to minimize caregiver participation in decision making which made caregivers feel disempowered in discussions about patient care. Caregivers tended to be more involved in decision making when caregivers assumed caregiving duties by choice and when the patient did not feel restricted by their reliance on their caregiver. Open communication between patients and caregivers made patients more trusting of their caregiver.Conclusion. Patient and caregiver dyadic interventions in specialist palliative care involving decision making need to account for how obligation and choice manifest and function between the patient and caregiver. J Pain Symptom Manage 2023;66:570 -577.(c) 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
引用
收藏
页码:570 / 577
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], About us
  • [2] "Never at ease" - family carers within integrated palliative care: a multinational, mixed method study
    Ates, Guelay
    Ebenau, Anne Frederieke
    Busa, Csilla
    Csikos, Agnes
    Hasselaar, Jeroen
    Jaspers, Birgit
    Menten, Johan
    Payne, Sheila
    Van Beek, Karen
    Varey, Sandra
    Groot, Marieke
    Radbruch, Lukas
    [J]. BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2018, 17
  • [3] Shared decision-making in palliative care: Research priorities to align care with patients' values
    Belanger, Emmanuelle
    [J]. PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 31 (07) : 585 - 586
  • [4] Billings JA, 2011, ARCH INTERN MED, V171, P849, DOI 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.180
  • [5] Costs of formal and informal care in the last year of life for patients in receipt of specialist palliative care
    Brick, Aoife
    Smith, Samantha
    Normand, Charles
    O'Hara, Sinead
    Droog, Elsa
    Tyrrell, Ella
    Cunningham, Nathan
    Johnston, Bridget
    [J]. PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 31 (04) : 356 - 368
  • [6] A Sense of Obligation: Cultural Differences in the Experience of Obligation
    Buchtel, Emma E.
    Ng, Leo C. Y.
    Norenzayan, Ara
    Heine, Steven J.
    Biesanz, Jeremy C.
    Chen, Sylvia Xiaohua
    Bond, Michael Harris
    Peng, Qin
    Su, Yanjie
    [J]. PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2018, 44 (11) : 1545 - 1566
  • [7] Confused About Theoretical Sampling? Engaging Theoretical Sampling in Diverse Grounded Theory Studies
    Conlon, Catherine
    Timonen, Virpi
    Elliott-O'Dare, Catherine
    O'Keeffe, Sorcha
    Foley, Geraldine
    [J]. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2020, 30 (06) : 947 - 959
  • [8] Corbin J., 2008, BASICS QUALITATIVE R, DOI 10.4135/9781452230153
  • [9] How family caregivers of persons with advanced cancer assist with upstream healthcare decision-making: A qualitative study
    Dionne-Odom, J. Nicholas
    Ejem, Deborah
    Wells, Rachel
    Barnato, Amber E.
    Taylor, Richard A.
    Rocque, Gabrielle B.
    Turkman, Yasemin E.
    Kenny, Matthew
    Ivankova, Nataliya V.
    Bakitas, Marie A.
    Martin, Michelle Y.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (03):
  • [10] The supportive relationship between palliative patients and family caregivers
    Foley, Geraldine
    [J]. BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2018, 8 (02) : 184 - 186