Conceptualization of Agile Leadership Characteristics and Outcomes from NASA Agile Teams as a Path to the Development of an Agile Leadership Theory

被引:3
作者
Silva-Martinez, Jackelynne [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Carolina Univ, NASA, Johnson Space Ctr, Houston, TX USA
[2] John Wesley Sch Leadership, Winston Salem, NC USA
[3] NASA, Johnson Space Ctr, 4314 Misty Heather Ct, Houston, TX 77059 USA
关键词
Agile; agile transformation; constant comparative analysis; general inductive approach; grounded theory; leadership; value to the customer;
D O I
10.1177/23949643231202894
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to develop an agile leadership theory, which involved the identification of leadership characteristics and outcomes from agile teams as they incorporated agile principles to increase value to their customers. Although outputs of agile teams and how job satisfaction of employees affect customer satisfaction are well known, existing research does not fully cover the outcomes that agile teams generate. This makes it hard for risk-averse organizations to adopt agile transformations and efficiently equip their employees with agile leadership skills. A general inductive approach with strategies from constructivist grounded theory was used to collect and analyse data. Participants for this study were selected from agile teams at National Aeronautics and Space Administration using theoretical sampling and performing a constant comparative analysis driven by the data, aiming to draw out recurring patterns and most notable categories. Those resulted in four agile leadership characteristics and four outcomes from agile teams, and a proposed agile leadership model emerged as a path to developing a theory. Organizations can use these findings to support workforce development planning and measure their agile transformation efforts.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 188
页数:16
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   A study of value in agile software development organizations [J].
Alahyari, Hiva ;
Svensson, Richard Berntsson ;
Gorschek, Tony .
JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 2017, 125 :271-288
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2020, GAO-20-590G
[3]   ORGANIZATIONAL THEORIES - SOME CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION [J].
BACHARACH, SB .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1989, 14 (04) :496-515
[4]  
Calnan M., 2019, Journal of Creating Value, V5, P190, DOI DOI 10.1177/2394964319875601
[5]  
Charmaz K., 2014, Constructing grounded theory, V2nd
[6]  
Charmaz K., 1996, RETHINKING METHODS P, P27, DOI [DOI 10.4135/9781446221792.N3, 10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.01581-5, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.01581-5]
[7]   Agility from First Principles: Reconstructing the Concept of Agility in Information Systems Development [J].
Conboy, Kieran .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2009, 20 (03) :329-354
[8]   GROUNDED THEORY RESEARCH - PROCEDURES, CANONS AND EVALUATIVE CRITERIA [J].
CORBIN, J ;
STRAUSS, A .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SOZIOLOGIE, 1990, 19 (06) :418-427
[9]  
Denning Stephen, 2017, Strategy & Leadership, V45, P12, DOI 10.1108/SL-02-2017-0021
[10]  
Denning Stephen, 2016, Strategy & Leadership, V44, P10, DOI 10.1108/SL-06-2016-0043