Learning from the CO-CREATE project: A protocol for systems thinking across research (STAR)

被引:1
|
作者
Knai, Cecile [1 ,13 ]
Savona, Natalie [1 ,2 ]
Finegood, Diane [3 ,4 ]
Aguiar, Anaely [5 ]
Blanchard, Laurence [1 ]
Conway-Moore, Kaitlin [1 ]
Helleve, Arnfinn [6 ]
Klepp, Knut-Inge [6 ,7 ]
Lien, Nanna [7 ]
Luszczynska, Aleksandra [8 ,9 ]
Vlad, Ioana [10 ]
Ronnestad, Alfred Mestad [11 ]
Rutter, Harry [12 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Fac Publ Hlth Policy, London, England
[2] Cordi Bright, London, England
[3] Simon Fraser Univ, Biomed Physiol & Kinesiol, Burnaby, BC, Canada
[4] Simon Fraser Univ, Morris J Wosk Ctr Dialogue, Burnaby, BC, Canada
[5] Univ Bergen, Syst Dynam Grp, Bergen, Norway
[6] Norwegian Inst Publ Hlth, Div Mental & Phys Hlth, Oslo, Norway
[7] Univ Oslo, Fac Med, Dept Nutr, Oslo, Norway
[8] Univ Colorado, Trauma Hlth & Hazards Ctr, Denver, CO USA
[9] Warsaw Sch Social Sci & Humanities, Warsaw, Poland
[10] World Canc Res Fund, London, England
[11] PRESS Save Children Youth Norway, Oslo, Norway
[12] Univ Bath, Dept Social & Policy Sci, Bath, England
[13] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Fac Publ Hlth Policy, 15-17 Tavistock Pl, London WC1H 9SH, England
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
adolescents; complex projects; research planning; systems thinking; FRAMEWORK; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1111/obr.13624
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The CO-CREATE project aimed to work with young people to create, inform, and disseminate obesity-preventive evidence-based policies using a complex systems perspective. This paper draws lessons from this experience and proposes a protocol for embedding systems thinking within a research project. We first draw on existing systems thinking frameworks to analyze how systems thinking was translated across CO-CREATE, including the flow and relationship between the work packages and in the methods used. We then take the lessons from CO-CREATE and the principles of existing systems thinking frameworks-which focus on various points of intervention planning and delivery but not on research projects as a whole-to formulate a protocol for embedding systems thinking across a research project. Key lessons for future planning and delivery of systems-oriented research projects include incorporating "boundary critique" by capturing key stakeholder (adolescent) values and concerns; working to avoid social exclusion; ensuring methodological pluralism to allow for reflection and responsiveness (with methods ranging from group model building, Photovoice, and small group engagement); getting policy recipients to shape key questions by understanding their views on the critical drivers of obesity early on in the project; and providing opportunity for intraproject reflection along the way.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [21] Promoting Systems Thinking and Abstract Thinking in High-School Electronics Students: Integration of Dedicated Tasks into Project-Based Learning
    Shekh-Abed, Aziz
    Hazzan, Orit
    Gero, Aharon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2021, 37 (04) : 1080 - 1089
  • [22] A Literature Review of Social Commerce Research from a Systems Thinking Perspective
    Wang, Xintian
    Wang, Hai
    Zhang, Caiming
    SYSTEMS, 2022, 10 (03):
  • [23] Reciprocal Learning in the Partnership Project: From Knowing to Doing in Comparative Research Models
    Connelly, F. Michael
    Xu, Shijing
    TEACHERS AND TEACHING, 2019, 25 (06) : 627 - 646
  • [24] Learning From a Failed Mixed Methods Child Art-Therapy Research Project
    Ciuhan, Geanina Cucu
    Iliescu, Dragos
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2020, 19
  • [25] Learning lessons for automated vehicle design: Using systems thinking to analyse and compare automation-related accidents across transport domains
    Read, Gemma J. M.
    O'Brien, Alison
    Stanton, Neville A.
    Salmon, Paul M.
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2022, 153
  • [26] Working at the interface between systems and complexity thinking: Insights from a market access design project for poor livestock producers
    Woog, Robert
    Cavana, Robert Y.
    Roberts, Roger
    Packham, Roger
    SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 2006, 23 (06) : 727 - 741
  • [27] Participatory co-learning for human-wildlife coexistence: Reflections on a novel program applying systems thinking, nonviolent communication, and learning-based approaches
    Kansky, Ruth
    Maassarani, Tarek
    Fischer, Joern
    AMBIO, 2024, 53 (10) : 1479 - 1491
  • [28] K12 Practitioners’ Perceptions of Learning from Failure, Creativity, and Systems Thinking: a Collective Case Study
    T. Logan Arrington
    Alison L. Moore
    Lauren M. Bagdy
    TechTrends, 2021, 65 : 636 - 645
  • [29] K12 Practitioners' Perceptions of Learning from Failure, Creativity, and Systems Thinking: a Collective Case Study
    Arrington, T. Logan
    Moore, Alison L.
    Bagdy, Lauren M.
    TECHTRENDS, 2021, 65 (04) : 636 - 645
  • [30] The nexus across water, energy and food (WEF): Learning from research, building on evidence, strengthening practice
    Holmatov, B.
    Lautze, J.
    Uhlenbrook, S.
    NATURAL RESOURCES FORUM, 2023, 47 (04) : 817 - 841