Measuring the agricultural sustainability of India: An application of pressure-state-response model

被引:21
作者
Jatav, Surendra Singh [1 ]
Naik, Kalu [2 ]
机构
[1] Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar Univ, Lucknow 226025, India
[2] India Council Agr Res ICAR, Natl Inst Agr Econ & Policy Res, New Delhi 110012, India
关键词
Indicator approach; Agro-climatic region; Sustainable development goals (SDGs); Pressure -state -response model; Environmental sustainability index; Economic security index; Social security index; Agricultural sustainability index; CLIMATE-CHANGE; INTENSIFICATION; IMPACTS; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.regsus.2023.05.006
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Analyzing agricultural sustainability is essential for designing and assessing rural development initiatives. However, accurately measuring agricultural sustainability is complicated since it involves so many different factors. This study provides a new suite of quantitative indicators for assessing agricultural sustainability at regional and district levels, involving environmental sustainability, social security, and economic security. Combining the Pressure-State-Response (PSR) model and indicator approach, this study creates a composite agricultural sustainability index for the 14 mainstream agro-climatic regions of India. The results of this study show that the TransGengatic Plain Region (TGPR) ranks first in agricultural sustainability among India's 14 mainstream agro-climatic regions, while the Eastern Himalayan Region (EHR) ranks last. Higher livestock ownership, cropping intensity, per capita income, irrigation intensity, share of institutional credit, food grain productivity, crop diversification, awareness of minimum support price, knowledge sharing with fellow farmers, and young and working population, as well as better transportation facilities and membership of agricultural credit societies are influencing indicators responsible for higher agricultural sustainability in TGPR compared with EHR. Although, the scores of environmental sustainability indicators of EHR are quite good, its scores of social and economic security indicators are fairly low, putting it at the bottom of the rank of agricultural sustainability index among the 14 mainstream agro-climatic regions in India. This demonstrates the need of understanding agricultural sustainability in relation to social and economic dimensions. In a nation as diverse and complicated as India, it is the social structure that determines the health of the economy and environment. Last but not least, the sustainability assessment methodology may be used in a variety of India's agro-climatic regions.
引用
收藏
页码:218 / 234
页数:17
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Assessing farmer use of climate change adaptation practices and impacts on food security and poverty in Pakistan [J].
Ali, Akhter ;
Erenstein, Olaf .
CLIMATE RISK MANAGEMENT, 2017, 16 :183-194
[2]  
Anjani Kumar Anjani Kumar, 2015, Agricultural Economics Research Review, V28, P151
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, WEATHER VARIABILITY
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Understanding poverty
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, The State of Food and Agriculture: Leveraging Food Items for Inclusive Rural Transformation
[6]  
Boserup E., 2005, CONDITIONS AGR GROWT, Vfirst, P1
[7]   An energy systems view of sustainability: Emergy evaluation of the San Luis Basin, Colorado [J].
Campbell, Daniel E. ;
Garmestani, Ahjond S. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2012, 95 (01) :72-97
[8]   Ecological intensification of cereal production systems: Yield potential, soil quality, and precision agriculture [J].
Cassman, KG .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1999, 96 (11) :5952-5959
[9]   Development and application of an integrated sustainability index for small-holder dairy farms in Rajasthan, India [J].
Chand, Prem ;
Sirohi, Smita ;
Sirohi, S. K. .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2015, 56 :23-30
[10]  
Chand R., 2003, GOVT INTERVENTION FO