Real-world assessment of the clinical performance of COVID-VIRO ALL IN rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen test

被引:0
作者
Pighi, Laura [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Henry, Brandon M. [4 ]
De Nitto, Simone [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gianfilippi, Gianluca [5 ]
Salvagno, Gian Luca [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lippi, Giuseppe [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Verona, Sect Clin Biochem, Verona, Italy
[2] Univ Verona, Sch Med, Verona, Italy
[3] Pederzoli Hosp, Serv Lab Med, Peschiera Del Garda, Italy
[4] Pederzoli Hosp, Med Direct, Peschiera Del Garda, Italy
[5] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr, Div Nephrol & Hypertens, Clin Lab, Cincinnati, OH USA
[6] Univ Hosp Verona, Sect Clin Biochem, Piazzale LA Scuro 10, I-37134 Verona, Italy
[7] Univ Hosp Verona, Sch Med, Piazzale LA Scuro 10, I-37134 Verona, Italy
关键词
antigen testing; COVID-19; diagnosis; infection; SARS-CoV-2;
D O I
10.1515/dx-2022-0138
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives Since the external validation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 antigen rapid diagnostic tests (SARS-CoV-2 RDT-Ags) is a necessary requisite before they can be introduced into routine clinical practice, this study reports the results of a real-world assessment of the clinical performance of the new COVID-VIRO ALL IN device.Methods The study population consisted in 165 outpatients (median age: 43 years, range: 14-68 years; 66.1% females) who had paired nasal and nasopharyngeal samples collected upon hospital presentation. The samples were concomitantly tested with the AAZ-LMB COVID-VIRO ALL IN SARS-CoV-2 RDT-Ag and with Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).Results The number of subjects with positive RT-PCR results (i.e., mean Ct value < 45) was 116 (70.3%), 109 (66.1%) and 86 (52.1%) with mean Ct values < 37 and < 30, respectively. In all RT-PCR positive samples, COVID-VIRO ALL IN displayed 78.8% agreement, 0.698 sensitivity, 1.000 specificity, 0.583 negative predictive value (NPV) and 1.000 positive predictive value (PPV) compared to RT-PCR. The median Ct value of samples testing positive with COVID-VIRO ALL IN was significantly lower than those testing negative (22.8 vs. 32.2; p < 0.001). In samples with high viral load (i.e., Ct value < 30), COVID-VIRO ALL IN displayed 92.1% agreement, 0.895 sensitivity, 0.949 specificity, 0.983 NPV and 0.951 PPV compared to RT-PCR.Conclusions Although the diagnostic performance of COVID-VIRO ALL IN do not exactly match those of the manufacturer, its high NPV in high viral load samples would enable fast-track and rapid identification of highly contagious subjects.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 192
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] AAZ-LMB, INSTRUCTION LEAFLET
  • [2] Cohen J, 2022, SCIENCE, V378, P814, DOI 10.1126/science.adf8989
  • [3] Epidemiologic Characteristics Associated With Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Antigen-Based Test Results, Real-Time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (rRT-PCR) Cycle Threshold Values, Subgenomic RNA, and Viral Culture Results From University Testing
    Ford, Laura
    Lee, Christine
    Pray, Ian W.
    Cole, Devlin
    Bigouette, John Paul
    Abedi, Glen R.
    Bushman, Dena
    Delahoy, Miranda J.
    Currie, Dustin W.
    Cherney, Blake
    Kirby, Marie K.
    Fajardo, Geroncio C.
    Caudill, Motria
    Langolf, Kimberly
    Kahrs, Juliana
    Zochert, Tara
    Kelly, Patrick
    Pitts, Collin
    Lim, Ailam
    Aulik, Nicole
    Tamin, Azaibi
    Harcourt, Jennifer L.
    Queen, Krista
    Zhang, Jing
    Whitaker, Brett
    Browne, Hannah
    Medrzycki, Magdalena
    Shewmaker, Patricia L.
    Bonenfant, Gaston
    Zhou, Bin
    Folster, Jennifer M.
    Bankamp, Bettina
    Bowen, Michael D.
    Thornburg, Natalie J.
    Goffard, Kimberly
    Limbago, Brandi
    Bateman, Allen
    Tate, Jacqueline E.
    Gieryn, Douglas
    Kirking, Hannah L.
    Westergaard, Ryan P.
    Killerby, Marie E.
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 73 (06) : E1348 - E1355
  • [4] Performance of point-of care molecular and antigen-based tests for SARS-CoV-2: a living systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fragkou, Paraskevi C.
    Moschopoulos, Charalampos D.
    Dimopoulou, Dimitra
    Ong, David S. Y.
    Dimopoulou, Konstantina
    Nelson, Philipp P.
    Schweitzer, Valentijn A.
    Janocha, Hannah
    Karofylakis, Emmanouil
    Papathanasiou, Konstantinos A.
    Tsiordras, Sotirios
    De Angelis, Giulia
    Thoelken, Clemens
    Sanguinetti, Maurizio
    Chung, Ho-Ryun
    Skevaki, Chrysanthi
    [J]. CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2023, 29 (03) : 291 - 301
  • [5] Comparison of the Clinical Performance of the Point-of-care STANDARD M10 SARS-CoV-2 and Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 Assays
    Hong, Ki Ho
    Lee, Jaehyeon
    Kim, So Yeon
    Oh, Yeseul
    Cho, Hae Weon
    Lee, Hyukmin
    [J]. ANNALS OF LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2023, 43 (01) : 111 - 113
  • [6] Istituto Superiore di Sanita, SORVEGLIANZA INTEGRA
  • [7] Identification of contagious SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals by Roche's Rapid Antigen Test
    Kessler, Harald H.
    Prueller, Florian
    Hardt, Melina
    Stelzl, Evelyn
    Foederl-Hoebenreich, Esther
    Pailer, Sabine
    Lueger, Andreas
    Kreuzer, Philipp
    Zatloukal, Kurt
    Herrmann, Markus
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2022, 60 (05) : 778 - 785
  • [8] Brief update on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) diagnostics
    Lippi, Giuseppe
    [J]. ADVANCES IN LABORATORY MEDICINE-AVANCES EN MEDICINA DE LABORATORIO, 2020, 1 (04):
  • [9] An overview of the most important preanalytical factors influencing the clinical performance of SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs)
    Lippi, Giuseppe
    Henry, Brandon M.
    Plebani, Mario
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2023, 61 (02) : 196 - 204
  • [10] Lippi Giuseppe, 2022, EJIFCC, V33, P94