The AUGIS Survival Predictor: Prediction of Long-Term and Conditional Survival After Esophagectomy Using Random Survival Forests

被引:43
作者
Rahman, Saqib A. [1 ,5 ]
Walker, Robert C. [1 ]
Maynard, Nick [2 ]
Trudgill, Nigel [3 ]
Crosby, Tom A. [4 ]
Cromwell, David J. [5 ]
Underwood, Timothy [1 ,5 ]
NOGCA Project Team AUGIS
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Fac Med, Sch Canc Sci, Southampton, England
[2] Oxford Univ Hosp NHS Trust, Oxford, England
[3] Sandwell & West Birmingham Hosp NHS Trust, Birmingham, England
[4] Velindre Canc Ctr, Cardiff, Wales
[5] Royal Coll Surgeons England, Clin Effectiveness Unit, London, England
关键词
esophageal cancer; esophagus; machine learning; prognostic model; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CANCER; ESOPHAGUS; EDITION; MODEL; TIME;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0000000000004794
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective:The aim of this study was to develop a predictive model for overall survival after esophagectomy using pre/postoperative clinical data and machine learning. Summary Background Data:For patients with esophageal cancer, accurately predicting long-term survival after esophagectomy is challenging. This study investigated survival prediction after esophagectomy using a RandomSurvival Forest (RSF) model derived from routine data from a large, well-curated, national dataset. Methods:Patients diagnosed with esophageal adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma between 2012 and 2018 in England and Wales who underwent an esophagectomy were included. Prediction models for overall survival were developed using the RSF method and Cox regression from 41 patient and disease characteristics. Calibration and discrimination (time-dependent area under the curve) were validated internally using bootstrap resampling. Results:The study analyzed 6399 patients, with 2625 deaths during follow-up. Median follow-up was 41 months. Overall survival was 47.1% at 5 years. The final RSF model included 14 variables and had excellent discrimination with a 5-year time-dependent area under the receiver operator curve of 83.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 82.6%-84.9%], compared to 82.3% (95% CI 81.1%-83.3%) for the Cox model. The most important variables were lymph node involvement, pT stage, circumferential resection margin involvement (tumor at < 1 mm from cut edge) and age. There was a wide range of survival estimates even within TNM staging groups, with quintiles of prediction within Stage 3b ranging from 12.2% to 44.7% survival at 5 years. Conclusions:An RSF model for long-term survival after esophagectomy exhibited excellent discrimination and well-calibrated predictions. At a patient level, it provides more accuracy than TNM staging alone and could help in the delivery of tailored treatment and follow-up.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 274
页数:8
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Perioperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel versus fluorouracil or capecitabine plus cisplatin and epirubicin for locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4): a randomised, phase 2/3 trial [J].
Al-Batran, Salah-Eddin ;
Homann, Nils ;
Pauligk, Claudia ;
Goetze, Thorsten O. ;
Meiler, Johannes ;
Kasper, Stefan ;
Kopp, Hans-Georg ;
Mayer, Frank ;
Haag, Georg Martin ;
Luley, Kim ;
Lindig, Udo ;
Schmiegel, Wolff ;
Pohl, Michael ;
Stoehlmacher, Jan ;
Folprecht, Gunnar ;
Probst, Stephan ;
Prasnikar, Nicole ;
Fischbach, Wolfgang ;
Mahlberg, Rolf ;
Trojan, Joerg ;
Koenigsmann, Michael ;
Martens, Uwe M. ;
Thuss-Patience, Peter ;
Egger, Matthias ;
Block, Andreas ;
Heinemann, Volker ;
Illerhaus, Gerald ;
Moehler, Markus ;
Schenk, Michael ;
Kullmann, Frank ;
Behringer, Dirk M. ;
Heike, Michael ;
Pink, Daniel ;
Teschendorf, Christian ;
Loehr, Carmen ;
Bernhard, Helga ;
Schuch, Gunter ;
Rethwisch, Volker ;
von Weikersthal, Ludwig Fischer ;
Hartmann, Joerg T. ;
Kneba, Michael ;
Daum, Severin ;
Schulmann, Karsten ;
Weniger, Joerg ;
Belle, Sebastian ;
Gaiser, Timo ;
Oduncu, Fuat S. ;
Guentner, Martina ;
Hozaeel, Wael ;
Reichart, Alexander .
LANCET, 2019, 393 (10184) :1948-1957
[2]   Guidelines for the management of oesophageal and gastric cancer [J].
Allum, William H. ;
Blazeby, Jane M. ;
Griffin, S. Michael ;
Cunningham, David ;
Jankowski, Janusz A. ;
Wong, Rachel .
GUT, 2011, 60 (11) :1449-1472
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Protocol for examination of specimens from patients with carcinoma of the prostate gland.Version: Prostate 4.0.0.0
[5]   The c-index is not proper for the evaluation of -year predicted risks [J].
Blanche, Paul ;
Kattan, Michael W. ;
Gerds, Thomas A. .
BIOSTATISTICS, 2019, 20 (02) :347-357
[6]   Estimating and comparing time-dependent areas under receiver operating characteristic curves for censored event times with competing risks [J].
Blanche, Paul ;
Dartigues, Jean-Francois ;
Jacqmin-Gadda, Helene .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2013, 32 (30) :5381-5397
[7]  
Caruana R., 2006, P 23 INT C MACHINE L, P161, DOI [10.1145/1143844.1143865, DOI 10.1145/1143844.1143865]
[8]  
Collins GS, 2015, ANN INTERN MED, V162, P55, DOI [10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.025, 10.1111/eci.12376, 10.7326/M14-0697, 10.1186/s12916-014-0241-z, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.010, 10.7326/M14-0698, 10.1038/bjc.2014.639, 10.1002/bjs.9736, 10.1136/bmj.g7594]
[9]  
Cromwell D., 2019, National oesophago-gastric cancer audit
[10]   Health-Related Quality of Life Among 5-Year Survivors of Esophageal Cancer Surgery: A Prospective Population-Based Study [J].
Derogar, Maryam ;
Lagergren, Pernilla .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (04) :413-418