Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of the Turkish Version of Pain Resilience Scale

被引:1
作者
Dereli, Muge [1 ,2 ]
Kahraman, Turhan [3 ]
France, Christopher R. [4 ]
机构
[1] Adnan Menderes Univ, Aydin Vocat Sch Hlth Serv, Dept Therapy & Rehabil, Aydin, Turkey
[2] Izmir Katip Celebi Univ, Grad Sch Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy & Rehabil, Izmir, Turkey
[3] Izmir Katip Celebi Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy & Rehabil, Izmir, Turkey
[4] Ohio Univ, Dept Psychol, Athens, OH 45701 USA
关键词
cross-cultural adaptation; pain; resilience; reliability; validity; TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY; CATASTROPHIZING SCALE; QUESTIONNAIRE; VALIDITY; DEPRESSION;
D O I
10.1177/01632787221127377
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The Pain Resilience Scale (PRS) is a useful tool that evaluates behavioral engagement and adaptively regulates cognitions and emotions despite the pain. This study aimed to translate the PRS to Turkish and investigate its psychometric properties. The Turkish version of PRS was completed online by 332 healthy adults, and a subset of 105 respondents was re-assessed after 7-14 days. The reliability of the adapted measure was evaluated in terms of internal consistency, relative, and absolute test-retest reliability. Validity was evaluated in terms of structural, construct, and known-group validity using positive and negative psychological scales. The Turkish version of PRS has a three-factor structure and its cumulative variance is 78.06%. The total PRS score and its subscales correlated positively with pain self-efficacy, general resilience, and quality of life, and negatively with pain catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, anxiety, depression, and disability. The PRS scores were significantly higher in those with high general resilience (p < 0.001). The PRS had high internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Standard Error of Measurement (SEM) and Minimum Detectable Difference (MDD) were calculated as 2.9 and 8.0, respectively. The Turkish version of PRS is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring pain resilience in terms of behavioral perseverance and cognitive positivity.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 151
页数:12
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research [J].
Andresen, EM .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2000, 81 (12) :S15-S20
[2]   Validation of the Pain Resilience Scale in a Chronic Pain Sample [J].
Ankawi, Brett ;
Slepian, P. Maxwell ;
Himawan, Lina K. ;
France, Christopher R. .
JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2017, 18 (08) :984-993
[3]  
Aydemir O., 1997, Turk Psikiyatri Dergisi, V8, P280
[4]   Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures [J].
Beaton, DE ;
Bombardier, C ;
Guillemin, F ;
Ferraz, MB .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (24) :3186-3191
[5]   Resilience in patients with amputation because of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome type I [J].
Bodde, Marlies I. ;
Schrier, Ernst ;
Krans, Hilde K. ;
Geertzen, Jan H. ;
Dijkstra, Pieter U. .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2014, 36 (10) :838-843
[6]   A comparison of pain rating scales by sampling from clinical trial data [J].
Breivik, EK ;
Björnsson, GA ;
Skovlund, E .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2000, 16 (01) :22-28
[7]   Revisiting the standard errors of measurement, estimate, and prediction and their application to test scores [J].
Charter, RA .
PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1996, 82 (03) :1139-1144
[8]   Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience scale (CD-RISC) [J].
Connor, KM ;
Davidson, JRT .
DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY, 2003, 18 (02) :76-82
[9]   QUESTIONNAIRE DEVELOPMENT - AN EXAMINATION OF THE NORDIC MUSCULOSKELETAL QUESTIONNAIRE [J].
DICKINSON, CE ;
CAMPION, K ;
FOSTER, AF ;
NEWMAN, SJ ;
OROURKE, AMT ;
THOMAS, PG .
APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 1992, 23 (03) :197-201
[10]   STUDIES WITH PAIN RATING-SCALES [J].
DOWNIE, WW ;
LEATHAM, PA ;
RHIND, VM ;
WRIGHT, V ;
BRANCO, JA ;
ANDERSON, JA .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 1978, 37 (04) :378-381