Security assessment and obstacle factors diagnosis of water-energy-food nexus based on pressure-state-response framework in Northwest China

被引:7
作者
Ji, Juan [1 ]
Chen, Junfei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ding, Tonghui [1 ]
Gu, Yan [1 ]
机构
[1] Hohai Univ, Sch Business, Nanjing 211100, Peoples R China
[2] Hohai Univ, Yangtze Inst Conservat & Dev, Nanjing 210098, Peoples R China
[3] Jiangsu Res Base Yangtze Inst Conservat & High Qu, Nanjing 210098, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Water-energy-food; Pressure-state-response; Set pair analysis; Variable fuzzy set; Obstacle factors diagnosis; Security assessment; FUZZY-SET THEORY; SUSTAINABILITY; INDICATORS; ENTROPY; BRAZIL; MODEL; INDEX;
D O I
10.1007/s00477-022-02274-3
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the context of population growth and increasingly scarce resources, the sustainability of water-energy-food nexus (WEFN) has been considered as a major global challenge. This study presented the evaluation index system of WEFN security based on pressure-state-response framework. Then the set pair analysis and variable fuzzy sets were supplied to evaluate the WEFN security in Northwest China from 2010 to 2019. Finally, obstacle degree model was adopted to diagnose the main factors affecting the WEFN security. The results indicated that over the years, in addition to response-subsystem, the safety level of the Northwest China WEFN had obvious spatio-temporal differentiation, which was always between critically safe and unsafe, but the overall trend was positive. In the pressure-subsystem, the WEFN security only in Gansu and Inner Mongolia was at a safe level; in the state-subsystem, the safe level of Ningxia and Shanxi was the worst; in the response-subsystem, the whole region was almost at an unsafe level. The annual average obstacle degree of three subsystems was compared as follows: pressure-subsystem > state-subsystem > response-subsystem. And, their obstacle factors were almost all related to water. The key to improving WEFN security of Northwest China in the future is to deal with the serious mismatch between water and energy resources.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 88
页数:16
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] The Water-Energy-Food Nexus: A systematic review of methods for nexus assessment
    Albrecht, Tamee R.
    Crootof, Arica
    Scott, Christopher A.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2018, 13 (04):
  • [2] Water-energy-food nexus of sugarcane ethanol production in the state of Goias, Brazil: An analysis with regional input-output matrix
    Bellezoni, Rodrigo A.
    Sharma, Deepak
    Villela, Alberto Arruda
    Pereira Junior, Amaro Olimpio
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2018, 115 : 108 - 119
  • [3] Integrated risk analysis of water-energy nexus systems based on systems dynamics, orthogonal design and copula analysis
    Cai, Yanpeng
    Cai, Jianying
    Xu, Linyu
    Tan, Qian
    Xu, Qiao
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2019, 99 : 125 - 137
  • [4] Improving water saving measures is the necessary way to protect the ecological base flow of rivers in water shortage areas of Northwest China
    Cheng, Bo
    Li, Huaien
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2021, 123
  • [5] 程乾生, 1997, [北京大学学报. 自然科学版, Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis], V33, P12
  • [6] Chinese Society for Urban Studies, 2007, EV STAND LIV CIT CHI
  • [7] Chuan T, 2000, RES ENV SCI, V13, P53
  • [8] Davis N, 2011, GLOBAL RISKS 2011 RE, V6
  • [9] An index-based approach for the sustainability assessment of irrigation practice based on the water-energy-food nexus framework
    de Vito, Rossella
    Portoghese, Ivan
    Pagano, Alessandro
    Fratino, Umberto
    Vurro, Michele
    [J]. ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2017, 110 : 423 - 436
  • [10] Assessment of the economic and environmental sustainability of Variable Rate Technology (VRT) application in different wheat intensive European agricultural areas. A Water energy food nexus approach
    Fabiani, Stefano
    Vanino, Silvia
    Napoli, Rosario
    Zajicek, Antonin
    Duffkova, Renata
    Evangelou, Eleftherios
    Nino, Pasquale
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2020, 114 : 366 - 376