Implant-supported single all-ceramic crowns made from prefabricated (stock) or individualized CAD/CAM zirconia abutments: A 5 year randomized clinical trial

被引:6
作者
Wittneben, Julia-Gabriela [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Abou-Ayash, Samir [1 ]
Gashi, Ardian [1 ]
Buser, Daniel [3 ]
Belser, Urs [4 ]
Braegger, Urs [1 ]
Sailer, Irena [4 ]
Gavric, Jelena [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Sch Dent Med, Dept Reconstruct Dent & Gerodontol, Bern, Switzerland
[2] Harvard Sch Dent Med, Dept Restorat Dent & Biomat Sci, Boston, MA USA
[3] Univ Bern, Sch Dent Med, Dept Oral Surg & Stomatol, Bern, Switzerland
[4] Univ Geneva, Sch Dent Med, Dept Reconstruct Dent, Geneva, Switzerland
[5] Univ Bern, Sch Dent Med, Dept Reconstruct Dent & Gerodontol, Freiburgstr 7, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
关键词
CAD/CAM; ceramics; dental materials; implants; prosthodontics; SOFT-TISSUE; FOLLOW-UP; RESTORATIONS; TITANIUM; PINK;
D O I
10.1111/jerd.13188
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
AimThe aim of this randomized, prospective, and clinical multicenter study was to compare the overall clinical performance of two restorative options over a 5-year period: individualized CAD/CAM abutments veneered with a hand-layered ceramic, and prefabricated zirconium dioxide abutments veneered with press ceramic and inserted into a single edentulous gap in the anterior maxilla.Materials and MethodsForty subjects were recruited from two universities: 20 from the University of XX and 20 from the University of XY. Each subject received an implant to restore a single edentulous gap in the maxillary anterior region (14-24 FDI). 20 patients were randomized into each Group. Group A received a one-piece single crown produced from a prefabricated zirconia abutment with pressed ceramic and Group B received an individualized CAD/CAM zirconia abutment with a hand-layered technique. After 5 years, the aesthetic and radiographic parameters were assessed.ResultsGroup A had four dropouts and one failure, resulting in a 95% survival rate and 95% success rate. Group B had two dropouts and two failures which resulted in a 90% survival rate and 90% success rate. No crestal bone level changes were observed, with a mean DIB of 0.06 mm in Group A and 0.09 mm in Group B. No statistically significant differences were present at baseline, 6 months, 1 year, 3 years, or 5 years for DIB values between time points and groups. Pink aesthetic score/white aesthetic score, Peri-Implant and Crown Index, and Implant Crown Aesthetic Index values were stable over time at all five points for both groups.ConclusionBoth implant-supported restorative options represent a valuable treatment option for the restoration of implant crowns in the anterior maxilla.Clinical SignificanceIn general, the use of ceramic abutments in the anterior zone represents a valuable treatment procedure with both standardized and CAD/CAM individualized abutments and following the recommendations from the respective manufacturer(s).
引用
收藏
页码:164 / 173
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Abou-Ayash Samir, 2023, Clin Oral Implants Res, V34 Suppl 26, P177, DOI 10.1111/clr.14065
[2]  
ALBREKTSSON T, 1986, DENT CLIN N AM, V30, P151
[3]  
Belser UC, 2009, J PERIODONTOL, V80, P140, DOI [10.1902/jop.2009.080435, 10.1902/jop.2009.080435 ]
[4]   Influence of abutment material on the gingival color of implant-supported all-ceramic restorations: a prospective multicenter study [J].
Bressan, Eriberto ;
Paniz, Gianluca ;
Lops, Diego ;
Corazza, Boris ;
Romeo, Eugenio ;
Favero, Gianantonio .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2011, 22 (06) :631-637
[5]  
Brunner E., 2013, NONPARAMETRIC METHOD
[6]  
Buser D, 1991, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V6, P405
[7]   Implant placement post extraction in esthetic single tooth sites: when immediate, when early, when late? [J].
Buser, Daniel ;
Chappuis, Vivianne ;
Belser, Urs C. ;
Chen, Stephen .
PERIODONTOLOGY 2000, 2017, 73 (01) :84-102
[8]   Mechanical testing of thin-walled zirconia abutments [J].
Canullo, Luigi ;
Coelho, Paulo G. ;
Bonfante, Estevam A. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ORAL SCIENCE, 2013, 21 (01) :20-24
[9]  
Cicchetti D. V., 1994, Psychological Assessment, V6, P284, DOI [DOI 10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284, https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284]
[10]   10-year prospective cohort follow-up of mmediately restored XiVE implants [J].
Degidi, Marco ;
Nardi, Diego ;
Piattelli, Adriano .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2016, 27 (06) :694-700