A New Framework for Estimating and Decomposing the Uncertainty of Climate Projections

被引:5
作者
Zhang, Shaobo [1 ]
Zhou, Zuhao [2 ]
Peng, Peiyi [3 ]
Xud, Chongyu [4 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Management Sci & Engn, Bengbu, Peoples R China
[2] China Inst Water Resources & Hydropower Res, State Key Lab Simulat & Regulat Water Cycle River, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Chongqing Jiaotong Univ, Southwest Res Inst Water Transport Engn, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Oslo, Dept Geosci, Oslo, Norway
关键词
Climate change; Climate prediction; Uncertainty; Climate models; Internal variability; GENERAL-CIRCULATION MODELS; SURFACE HYDROLOGY PARAMETERIZATION; INTERNAL VARIABILITY; LARGE ENSEMBLES; CMIP5; TRANSFERABILITY; QUANTIFICATION; PRECIPITATION; COMPONENTS; EXTREMES;
D O I
10.1175/JCLI-D-23-0064.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Climate projections obtained by running global climate models (GCMs) are subject to multisource uncer-tainties. The existing framework based on analysis of variance (ANOVA) for decomposing such uncertainties is unable to include the interaction effect between GCM and internal climate variability, which ranks only second to the main effect of GCM in significance. In this study, a three-way ANOVA framework is presented, and all main effects and interaction ef-fects are investigated. The results show that, although the overall uncertainty (O) is mainly contributed by main effects, in-teraction effects are considerable. Specifically, in the twenty-first century, the global mean (calculated at the grid-cell level and then averaged, and likewise below) relative contributions of all main effects are 54% for precipitation and 82% for temperature; those of all interaction effects are, respectively, 46% and 18%. As the three-way ANOVA cannot investi-gate the uncertainty components resulting from uncertainty sources, it is improved by deducing the relationship between uncertainty components resulting from uncertainty sources and those resulting from the main effects and interaction effects. By the improved three-way ANOVA, Ois decomposed into uncertainty components resulting from the emission scenario (S), GCM (M), and internal climate variability (V). The results reveal that Ois mainly contributed by M in the twenty-first century for precipitation, and by M before the 2060s whereas by S thereafter for temperature. The robustness of the V characterization is explored by investigating the variation of Von the number of included ensemble members. The extent of the underestima-tion of the V contribution is roughly an average of 4% for precipitation and 1% for temperature.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 384
页数:20
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
Arias P., 2021, Climate Change 2021 The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, P33, DOI [10.1017/9781009157896.002, DOI 10.1017/9781009157896.002]
[2]   The Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation controls the impact of the North Atlantic Oscillation on North European climate [J].
Boergel, Florian ;
Frauen, Claudia ;
Neumann, Thomas ;
Markus Meier, H. E. .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 15 (10)
[3]   Quantifying uncertainty sources in an ensemble of hydrological climate-impact projections [J].
Bosshard, T. ;
Carambia, M. ;
Goergen, K. ;
Kotlarski, S. ;
Krahe, P. ;
Zappa, M. ;
Schaer, C. .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2013, 49 (03) :1523-1536
[4]  
Brown PT, 2017, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V7, P743, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE3381, 10.1038/nclimate3381]
[5]   INTERCOMPARISON AND INTERPRETATION OF CLIMATE FEEDBACK PROCESSES IN 19 ATMOSPHERIC GENERAL-CIRCULATION MODELS [J].
CESS, RD ;
POTTER, GL ;
BLANCHET, JP ;
BOER, GJ ;
DELGENIO, AD ;
DEQUE, M ;
DYMNIKOV, V ;
GALIN, V ;
GATES, WL ;
GHAN, SJ ;
KIEHL, JT ;
LACIS, AA ;
LETREUT, H ;
LI, ZX ;
LIANG, XZ ;
MCAVANEY, BJ ;
MELESHKO, VP ;
MITCHELL, JFB ;
MORCRETTE, JJ ;
RANDALL, DA ;
RIKUS, L ;
ROECKNER, E ;
ROYER, JF ;
SCHLESE, U ;
SHEININ, DA ;
SLINGO, A ;
SOKOLOV, AP ;
TAYLOR, KE ;
WASHINGTON, WM ;
WETHERALD, RT ;
YAGAI, I ;
ZHANG, MH .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1990, 95 (D10) :16601-16615
[6]   Cloud feedback in atmospheric general circulation models: An update [J].
Cess, RD ;
Zhang, MH ;
Ingram, WJ ;
Potter, GL ;
Alskseev, V ;
Barker, HW ;
Cohen-Solal, E ;
Colman, RA ;
Dazlich, DA ;
Del Genio, AD ;
Dix, MR ;
Dymnikov, V ;
Esch, M ;
Fowler, LD ;
Fraser, JR ;
Galin, V ;
Gates, WL ;
Hack, JJ ;
Kiehl, JT ;
Le Treut, H ;
Lo, KKW ;
McAvaney, BJ ;
Meleshko, VP ;
Morcrette, JJ ;
Randall, DA ;
Roeckner, E ;
Royer, JF ;
Schlesinger, ME ;
Sporyshev, PV ;
Timbal, B ;
Volodin, EM ;
Taylor, KE ;
Wang, W ;
Wetherald, RT .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1996, 101 (D8) :12791-12794
[7]   How Do Modeling Decisions Affect the Spread Among Hydrologic Climate Change Projections? Exploring a Large Ensemble of Simulations Across a Diversity of Hydroclimates [J].
Chegwidden, Oriana S. ;
Nijssen, Bart ;
Rupp, David E. ;
Arnold, Jeffrey R. ;
Clare, Martyn P. ;
Hamman, Joseph J. ;
Kao, Shih-Chieh ;
Mao, Yixin ;
Mizukami, Naoki ;
Mote, Philip W. ;
Pan, Ming ;
Pytlak, Erik ;
Xiao, Mu .
EARTHS FUTURE, 2019, 7 (06) :623-637
[8]   Comparison of CMIP6 and CMIP5 models in simulating climate extremes [J].
Chen, Huopo ;
Sun, Jianqi ;
Lin, Wenqing ;
Xu, Huiwen .
SCIENCE BULLETIN, 2020, 65 (17) :1415-1418
[9]  
Chen J, 2021, J CLIMATE, V34, P465, DOI [10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0424.1, 10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0424]
[10]   Remaining error sources in bias-corrected climate model outputs [J].
Chen, Jie ;
Brissette, Francois P. ;
Caya, Daniel .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2020, 162 (02) :563-582