The influence of altruistic personality, interpersonal distance and social observation on prosocial behavior: An event-related potential (ERP) study

被引:12
作者
Li, Mei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Li, Jin [2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Guanfei [2 ,3 ]
Fan, Wei [2 ,3 ]
Zhong, Yiping [2 ,3 ]
Li, Hong [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Normal Univ, Dept Psychol, 36 Lushan Rd, Changsha 410081, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] South China Normal Univ, Dept Psychol, 55 Zhongshan Rd, Guangzhou 510631, Peoples R China
[3] Cognit & Human Behav Key Lab Hunan Prov, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[4] Sichuan Normal Univ, Inst Brain & Psychol Sci, Chengdu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Altruistic personality; Interpersonal distance; Social observation; Prosocial behaviors; ERPs; P3; INDIRECT RECIPROCITY; COMPETITIVE ALTRUISM; OUTCOME EVALUATION; NEURAL RESPONSES; SELF; EMPATHY; SITUATION; TRAITS; BRAIN; COMPONENT;
D O I
10.3758/s13415-023-01124-1
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The psychological mechanisms that high and low altruists exhibit in different contexts remain unknown. This study examined the underlying mechanisms of the effect of altruistic personality, social observation, and interpersonal distance on prosocial behavior using event-related potentials (ERPs). Participants with high and low altruism were asked to make prosocial or non-prosocial choices toward different interpersonal distances (friends, acquaintances, or strangers) under the (non)observer condition. The electrophysiological responses to the choice stimuli were simultaneously recorded. The behavioral results demonstrated that high altruists had more prosocial choices, and these choices were unaffected by interpersonal distance and social observation. However, low altruists made more prosocial choices toward friends and acquaintances under the observer than nonobserver conditions, whereas their prosocial choices toward strangers showed no difference. The ERP results demonstrated that low altruists showed more negative N2 when the choice stimuli were toward strangers and acquaintances or under the nonobserver condition. Furthermore, low altruists showed larger P3 under the observer than nonobserver conditions when the choice stimuli were toward friends and acquaintances, while this difference was absent when the choice stimuli were toward strangers. However, for high altruists, no effect of interpersonal distance and social observation was observed in N2 and P3. These results suggest that the prosocial behavior of low altruists is mainly driven by reputational incentives, whereas high altruists are primarily motivated by concern about the well-being of others. Our findings provide insights into the prosocial behavior of high and low altruists in different contexts and support the empathy-altruism hypothesis.
引用
收藏
页码:1460 / 1472
页数:13
相关论文
共 74 条
  • [61] Cholesterol, triglycerides, and the Five-Factor Model of personality
    Sutin, Angelina R.
    Terracciano, Antonio
    Deiana, Barbara
    Uda, Manuela
    Schlessinger, David
    Lakatta, Edward G.
    Costa, Paul T., Jr.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 84 (02) : 186 - 191
  • [62] Reputation-based partner choice is an effective alternative to indirect reciprocity in solving social dilemmas
    Sylwester, Karolina
    Roberts, Gilbert
    [J]. EVOLUTION AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2013, 34 (03) : 201 - 206
  • [63] Closer the relatives are, more intimate and similar we are: Kinship effects on self-other overlap
    Tan, Qianbao
    Zhan, Youlong
    Gao, Shanshan
    Fan, Wei
    Chen, Jie
    Zhong, Yiping
    [J]. PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2015, 73 : 7 - 11
  • [64] 马基雅弗利主义量表在中国大学生中的修订
    汤舒俊
    郝佳
    涂阳军
    [J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2011, 19 (08) : 967 - 969
  • [65] Is prosocial video game exposure related to prosociality? An ERP study based on a prosocial help needed decision task
    Teng, Zhaojun
    Nie, Qian
    Liu, Yanling
    Guo, Cheng
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2018, 79 : 30 - 39
  • [66] Modulation of the brain activity in outcome evaluation by the presence of an audience: An electrophysiological investigation
    Tian, Tengxiang
    Feng, Xue
    Gu, Ruolei
    Broster, Lucas S.
    Feng, Chunliang
    Wang, Lili
    Guan, Qing
    Luo, Yue-Jia
    [J]. BRAIN RESEARCH, 2015, 1615 : 139 - 147
  • [67] The development of the N1 and N2 components in auditory oddball paradigms: a systematic review with narrative analysis and suggested normative values
    Tome, David
    Barbosa, Fernando
    Nowak, Kamila
    Marques-Teixeira, Joao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEURAL TRANSMISSION, 2015, 122 (03) : 375 - 391
  • [68] The timing of action-monitoring processes in the anterior cingulate cortex
    van Veen, V
    Carter, CS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2002, 14 (04) : 593 - 602
  • [69] How do we trust strangers? The neural correlates of decision making and outcome evaluation of generalized trust
    Wang, Yiwen
    Zhang, Zhen
    Jing, Yiming
    Valadez, Emilio A.
    Simons, Robert F.
    [J]. SOCIAL COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 11 (10) : 1666 - 1676
  • [70] When Does Gossip Promote Generosity? Indirect Reciprocity Under the Shadow of the Future
    Wu, Junhui
    Balliet, Daniel
    Van Lange, Paul A. M.
    [J]. SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PERSONALITY SCIENCE, 2015, 6 (08) : 923 - 930