The influence of altruistic personality, interpersonal distance and social observation on prosocial behavior: An event-related potential (ERP) study

被引:12
作者
Li, Mei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Li, Jin [2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Guanfei [2 ,3 ]
Fan, Wei [2 ,3 ]
Zhong, Yiping [2 ,3 ]
Li, Hong [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Normal Univ, Dept Psychol, 36 Lushan Rd, Changsha 410081, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] South China Normal Univ, Dept Psychol, 55 Zhongshan Rd, Guangzhou 510631, Peoples R China
[3] Cognit & Human Behav Key Lab Hunan Prov, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[4] Sichuan Normal Univ, Inst Brain & Psychol Sci, Chengdu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Altruistic personality; Interpersonal distance; Social observation; Prosocial behaviors; ERPs; P3; INDIRECT RECIPROCITY; COMPETITIVE ALTRUISM; OUTCOME EVALUATION; NEURAL RESPONSES; SELF; EMPATHY; SITUATION; TRAITS; BRAIN; COMPONENT;
D O I
10.3758/s13415-023-01124-1
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The psychological mechanisms that high and low altruists exhibit in different contexts remain unknown. This study examined the underlying mechanisms of the effect of altruistic personality, social observation, and interpersonal distance on prosocial behavior using event-related potentials (ERPs). Participants with high and low altruism were asked to make prosocial or non-prosocial choices toward different interpersonal distances (friends, acquaintances, or strangers) under the (non)observer condition. The electrophysiological responses to the choice stimuli were simultaneously recorded. The behavioral results demonstrated that high altruists had more prosocial choices, and these choices were unaffected by interpersonal distance and social observation. However, low altruists made more prosocial choices toward friends and acquaintances under the observer than nonobserver conditions, whereas their prosocial choices toward strangers showed no difference. The ERP results demonstrated that low altruists showed more negative N2 when the choice stimuli were toward strangers and acquaintances or under the nonobserver condition. Furthermore, low altruists showed larger P3 under the observer than nonobserver conditions when the choice stimuli were toward friends and acquaintances, while this difference was absent when the choice stimuli were toward strangers. However, for high altruists, no effect of interpersonal distance and social observation was observed in N2 and P3. These results suggest that the prosocial behavior of low altruists is mainly driven by reputational incentives, whereas high altruists are primarily motivated by concern about the well-being of others. Our findings provide insights into the prosocial behavior of high and low altruists in different contexts and support the empathy-altruism hypothesis.
引用
收藏
页码:1460 / 1472
页数:13
相关论文
共 74 条
  • [31] How do self-interest and other-need interact in the brain to determine altruistic behavior?
    Hu, Jie
    Li, Yue
    Yin, Yunlu
    Blue, Philip R.
    Yu, Hongbo
    Zhou, Xiaolin
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2017, 157 : 598 - 611
  • [32] Social value orientation modulates fairness processing during social decision-making: evidence from behavior and brain potentials
    Hu, Xinmu
    Mai, Xiaoqin
    [J]. SOCIAL COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 16 (07) : 670 - 682
  • [33] The social neuroscience of reputation
    Izuma, Keise
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH, 2012, 72 (04) : 283 - 288
  • [34] Processing of the Incentive for Social Approval in the Ventral Striatum during Charitable Donation
    Izuma, Keise
    Saito, Daisuke N.
    Sadato, Norihiro
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2010, 22 (04) : 621 - 631
  • [35] Social Observation Increases Functional Segregation between MPFC Subregions Predicting Prosocial Consumer Decisions
    Jung, Daehyun
    Sul, Sunhae
    Lee, Minwoo
    Kim, Hackjin
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
  • [36] Relationships between two types of reputational concern and altruistic behavior in daily life
    Kawamura, Yuta
    Kusumi, Takashi
    [J]. PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2018, 121 : 19 - 24
  • [37] Linking personality to helping behaviors at work: An interactional perspective
    King, EB
    George, JM
    Hebl, MR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2005, 73 (03) : 585 - 607
  • [38] Altruistic traits and organizational conditions in helping online
    Lee, Gyudong
    Lee, Won Jun
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2010, 26 (06) : 1574 - 1580
  • [39] Social distance modulates prosocial behaviors in the gain and loss contexts: An event-related potential (ERP) study
    Li, Jin
    Sun, Yu
    Li, Mei
    Li, Hui'e
    Fan, Wei
    Zhong, Yiping
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 150 : 83 - 91
  • [40] Sociality Mental Modes Modulate the Processing of Advice-Giving: An Event-Related Potentials Study
    Li, Jin
    Zhan, Youlong
    Fan, Wei
    Liu, Lei
    Li, Mei
    Sun, Yu
    Zhong, Yiping
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 9